药剂师驱动的住院细菌患者抗菌能力自动评分系统的评估

IF 0.8 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Hospital Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-06 DOI:10.1177/00185787231182567
Riley Karpen, Claire Murphy, Erica Reed, Anthony T Gerlach, Kari Cape, John Mellett, Sara A Atyia
{"title":"药剂师驱动的住院细菌患者抗菌能力自动评分系统的评估","authors":"Riley Karpen, Claire Murphy, Erica Reed, Anthony T Gerlach, Kari Cape, John Mellett, Sara A Atyia","doi":"10.1177/00185787231182567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The implementation of an automated, pharmacist-driven, scoring system within the EMR has been shown to improve patient care in patients with <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteremia by increasing the adherence to disease specific quality-of-care measures. However, there are a lack of studies evaluating the incorporation of blood culture review into standard, non-antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist workflow. Our institution implemented an automated, pharmacist-driven, antimicrobial scoring system in the electronic medical record (EMR) on August 6, 2019. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective, single-center, quasi-experimental study of hospitalized, non-critically ill adult (18-89 years of age) patients with bacteremia between July 6, 2018 and July 5, 2019 (pre-implementation group) and September 6, 2019 and September 5, 2020 (post-implementation group). The primary outcome was time to directed antibiotic therapy in patients with positive blood cultures. Secondary outcomes included hospital length-of-stay, days of therapy (DOT) while inpatient, time to effective therapy, 30-day all-cause mortality, and rates of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infections documented within 3 months of positive culture results. <b>Results:</b> Implementation of the antimicrobial scoring system did not result in a significant change in time to directed antibiotic therapy (32.5 hours vs 37.4 hours; <i>P</i> = .757). There was also no difference found for time to effective antibiotic therapy (-12.6 hours vs -14.2 hours; <i>P</i> =.905) and no difference found for all other secondary outcomes. <b>Conclusion:</b> The implementation of the antimicrobial scoring system did not lead to an improvement in clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to better define a patient population that may benefit from this system.</p>","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"1 1","pages":"32-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10786048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of an Automated, Pharmacist-Driven, Antimicrobial Patient Acuity Scoring System for Hospitalized Bacteremic Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Riley Karpen, Claire Murphy, Erica Reed, Anthony T Gerlach, Kari Cape, John Mellett, Sara A Atyia\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00185787231182567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The implementation of an automated, pharmacist-driven, scoring system within the EMR has been shown to improve patient care in patients with <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteremia by increasing the adherence to disease specific quality-of-care measures. However, there are a lack of studies evaluating the incorporation of blood culture review into standard, non-antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist workflow. Our institution implemented an automated, pharmacist-driven, antimicrobial scoring system in the electronic medical record (EMR) on August 6, 2019. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective, single-center, quasi-experimental study of hospitalized, non-critically ill adult (18-89 years of age) patients with bacteremia between July 6, 2018 and July 5, 2019 (pre-implementation group) and September 6, 2019 and September 5, 2020 (post-implementation group). The primary outcome was time to directed antibiotic therapy in patients with positive blood cultures. Secondary outcomes included hospital length-of-stay, days of therapy (DOT) while inpatient, time to effective therapy, 30-day all-cause mortality, and rates of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infections documented within 3 months of positive culture results. <b>Results:</b> Implementation of the antimicrobial scoring system did not result in a significant change in time to directed antibiotic therapy (32.5 hours vs 37.4 hours; <i>P</i> = .757). There was also no difference found for time to effective antibiotic therapy (-12.6 hours vs -14.2 hours; <i>P</i> =.905) and no difference found for all other secondary outcomes. <b>Conclusion:</b> The implementation of the antimicrobial scoring system did not lead to an improvement in clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to better define a patient population that may benefit from this system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"32-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10786048/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787231182567\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787231182567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在电子病历中实施自动化、药剂师驱动的评分系统已被证明可以通过提高对特定疾病护理质量措施的依从性来改善金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者的护理。然而,缺乏评估将血液培养审查纳入标准、非抗菌药物管理药剂师工作流程的研究。我们机构于2019年8月6日在电子病历(EMR)中实施了一个自动化、药剂师驱动的抗菌评分系统。方法:这是一项回顾性、单中心、准实验性研究,研究对象为住院的非危重成人(18-89岁) 2018年7月6日至2019年7月5日期间(实施前组)以及2019年9月6日和2020年9月5日(实施后组)的菌血症患者。主要结果是对血液培养呈阳性的患者进行定向抗生素治疗的时间。次要结果包括住院时间、住院治疗天数、有效治疗时间、30天全因死亡率和3年内记录的艰难梭菌感染率 数月的阳性培养结果。结果:抗菌评分系统的实施没有导致直接抗生素治疗时间的显著变化(32.5小时vs 37.4小时;P = .757)。有效抗生素治疗的时间也没有发现差异(−12.6 小时vs−14.2 小时;P =.905),并且对于所有其他次要结果没有发现差异。结论:抗菌药物评分系统的实施并没有改善临床结果。需要进一步的研究来更好地定义可能从该系统中受益的患者群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of an Automated, Pharmacist-Driven, Antimicrobial Patient Acuity Scoring System for Hospitalized Bacteremic Patients.

Purpose: The implementation of an automated, pharmacist-driven, scoring system within the EMR has been shown to improve patient care in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia by increasing the adherence to disease specific quality-of-care measures. However, there are a lack of studies evaluating the incorporation of blood culture review into standard, non-antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist workflow. Our institution implemented an automated, pharmacist-driven, antimicrobial scoring system in the electronic medical record (EMR) on August 6, 2019. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, quasi-experimental study of hospitalized, non-critically ill adult (18-89 years of age) patients with bacteremia between July 6, 2018 and July 5, 2019 (pre-implementation group) and September 6, 2019 and September 5, 2020 (post-implementation group). The primary outcome was time to directed antibiotic therapy in patients with positive blood cultures. Secondary outcomes included hospital length-of-stay, days of therapy (DOT) while inpatient, time to effective therapy, 30-day all-cause mortality, and rates of Clostridioides difficile infections documented within 3 months of positive culture results. Results: Implementation of the antimicrobial scoring system did not result in a significant change in time to directed antibiotic therapy (32.5 hours vs 37.4 hours; P = .757). There was also no difference found for time to effective antibiotic therapy (-12.6 hours vs -14.2 hours; P =.905) and no difference found for all other secondary outcomes. Conclusion: The implementation of the antimicrobial scoring system did not lead to an improvement in clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to better define a patient population that may benefit from this system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital Pharmacy
Hospital Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Hospital Pharmacy is a monthly peer-reviewed journal that is read by pharmacists and other providers practicing in the inpatient and outpatient setting within hospitals, long-term care facilities, home care, and other health-system settings The Hospital Pharmacy Assistant Editor, Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, DSc, FASHP, is author of a Medication Error Report Analysis and founder of The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), a nonprofit organization that provides education about adverse drug events and their prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信