海上井喷后的裂缝预防:选择合适的盖顶烟囱关井策略

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM
Andreas Michael, I. Gupta
{"title":"海上井喷后的裂缝预防:选择合适的盖顶烟囱关井策略","authors":"Andreas Michael, I. Gupta","doi":"10.2118/199673-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Following uncontrolled discharge during loss of well control events, fracture initiation occurring during the post-blowout capping stage can lead to reservoir fluids broaching to the seafloor. A classic example is Union Oil's 1969 oil spill in Santa Barbara Channel, where fracture initiation at various locations caused thousands of gallons per hour to broach onto the ocean floor over a month before it could be controlled (Mullineaux 1970; Easton 1972). Disasters such as these could be prevented if the effects of the post-blowout loss of well control stages (uncontrolled discharge and capping) are incorporated into the shut-in procedures, and the wellbore architectures are modified accordingly.\n In this study, analytical models are used to simulate the loads on the wellbore during the different stages of loss of control. Capping pressure buildup during the shut-in is modeled to indicate fracture initiation points during the capping stage. Using these models, the critical capping pressure for a well is determined, and subsequent critical discharge flow rates are calculated. Fracture initiation would occur if the actual discharge flow rate is below the calculated critical discharge flow rate. A hypothetical case study using typical deepwater Gulf of Mexico (GOM) parameters is performed demonstrating the likelihood of fracture initiation during different discharge flow rates, discharge periods, and capping stack shut-in methods (single-step/“abrupt” or multistep/“incremental”). An abrupt shut-in for this case study leads to fracture initiation at approximately 8 hours after shut-in, while a five-step incremental shut-in is shown to prevent any fracture initiation during the 48 hours after the beginning of the shut-in. Reservoir depletion through longer discharge periods or higher discharge flow rates, despite the adverse environmental effect, can delay or even prevent fracture initiations during post-blowout capping.\n The ability to model these fracture failures enhances the understanding of wellbore integrity problems induced during loss of control situations and helps create workflows for predicting possible broaching scenarios during the post-blowout capping stage. Dimensionless plots are used to present fracture initiation for different cases—this is useful for drilling and wellbore integrity engineers for making contingency plans for dealing with loss of well control situations.","PeriodicalId":51165,"journal":{"name":"SPE Drilling & Completion","volume":"2 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2118/199673-pa","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fracture Prevention Following Offshore Well Blowouts: Selecting the Appropriate Capping Stack Shut-In Strategy\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Michael, I. Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/199673-pa\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Following uncontrolled discharge during loss of well control events, fracture initiation occurring during the post-blowout capping stage can lead to reservoir fluids broaching to the seafloor. A classic example is Union Oil's 1969 oil spill in Santa Barbara Channel, where fracture initiation at various locations caused thousands of gallons per hour to broach onto the ocean floor over a month before it could be controlled (Mullineaux 1970; Easton 1972). Disasters such as these could be prevented if the effects of the post-blowout loss of well control stages (uncontrolled discharge and capping) are incorporated into the shut-in procedures, and the wellbore architectures are modified accordingly.\\n In this study, analytical models are used to simulate the loads on the wellbore during the different stages of loss of control. Capping pressure buildup during the shut-in is modeled to indicate fracture initiation points during the capping stage. Using these models, the critical capping pressure for a well is determined, and subsequent critical discharge flow rates are calculated. Fracture initiation would occur if the actual discharge flow rate is below the calculated critical discharge flow rate. A hypothetical case study using typical deepwater Gulf of Mexico (GOM) parameters is performed demonstrating the likelihood of fracture initiation during different discharge flow rates, discharge periods, and capping stack shut-in methods (single-step/“abrupt” or multistep/“incremental”). An abrupt shut-in for this case study leads to fracture initiation at approximately 8 hours after shut-in, while a five-step incremental shut-in is shown to prevent any fracture initiation during the 48 hours after the beginning of the shut-in. Reservoir depletion through longer discharge periods or higher discharge flow rates, despite the adverse environmental effect, can delay or even prevent fracture initiations during post-blowout capping.\\n The ability to model these fracture failures enhances the understanding of wellbore integrity problems induced during loss of control situations and helps create workflows for predicting possible broaching scenarios during the post-blowout capping stage. Dimensionless plots are used to present fracture initiation for different cases—this is useful for drilling and wellbore integrity engineers for making contingency plans for dealing with loss of well control situations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPE Drilling & Completion\",\"volume\":\"2 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2118/199673-pa\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPE Drilling & Completion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/199673-pa\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Drilling & Completion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/199673-pa","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在失去井控事件期间不受控制的排放之后,在井喷后封盖阶段发生的裂缝引发可能导致储层流体向海底倾斜。一个典型的例子是1969年联合石油公司在圣巴巴拉海峡的漏油事件,在控制漏油事件之前的一个多月里,不同位置的裂缝引发导致数千加仑/小时的水冲到海底(Mullineaux 1970;Easton 1972)。如果将井喷后井控阶段损失(不受控制的排放和封盖)的影响纳入关井程序,并相应地修改井筒结构,则可以防止此类灾害。在这项研究中,分析模型被用来模拟不同失控阶段井筒上的载荷。对关井期间的封盖压力建立进行建模,以指示封盖阶段的裂缝起始点。使用这些模型,确定了一口井的临界封盖压力,并计算了随后的临界排放流量。如果实际排放流量低于计算的临界排放流量,则会发生断裂。使用典型的墨西哥湾深水(GOM)参数进行了一项假设性案例研究,证明了在不同的排放流速、排放周期和封盖叠层关井方法(单步/“突然”或多步/“增量”)期间发生裂缝的可能性。本案例研究中的突然关井导致大约8 关井后数小时,同时显示了五步增量关井,以防止48 关闭开始数小时后。尽管存在不利的环境影响,但通过更长的排放期或更高的排放流速来耗尽储层,可以推迟甚至防止井喷后封盖期间的裂缝萌生。对这些裂缝失效进行建模的能力增强了对失控情况下引发的井筒完整性问题的理解,并有助于创建预测井喷后封盖阶段可能出现的拉削情况的工作流程。无量纲图用于显示不同情况下的裂缝萌生——这对于钻井和井筒完整性工程师制定应急计划以处理井控损失情况非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fracture Prevention Following Offshore Well Blowouts: Selecting the Appropriate Capping Stack Shut-In Strategy
Following uncontrolled discharge during loss of well control events, fracture initiation occurring during the post-blowout capping stage can lead to reservoir fluids broaching to the seafloor. A classic example is Union Oil's 1969 oil spill in Santa Barbara Channel, where fracture initiation at various locations caused thousands of gallons per hour to broach onto the ocean floor over a month before it could be controlled (Mullineaux 1970; Easton 1972). Disasters such as these could be prevented if the effects of the post-blowout loss of well control stages (uncontrolled discharge and capping) are incorporated into the shut-in procedures, and the wellbore architectures are modified accordingly. In this study, analytical models are used to simulate the loads on the wellbore during the different stages of loss of control. Capping pressure buildup during the shut-in is modeled to indicate fracture initiation points during the capping stage. Using these models, the critical capping pressure for a well is determined, and subsequent critical discharge flow rates are calculated. Fracture initiation would occur if the actual discharge flow rate is below the calculated critical discharge flow rate. A hypothetical case study using typical deepwater Gulf of Mexico (GOM) parameters is performed demonstrating the likelihood of fracture initiation during different discharge flow rates, discharge periods, and capping stack shut-in methods (single-step/“abrupt” or multistep/“incremental”). An abrupt shut-in for this case study leads to fracture initiation at approximately 8 hours after shut-in, while a five-step incremental shut-in is shown to prevent any fracture initiation during the 48 hours after the beginning of the shut-in. Reservoir depletion through longer discharge periods or higher discharge flow rates, despite the adverse environmental effect, can delay or even prevent fracture initiations during post-blowout capping. The ability to model these fracture failures enhances the understanding of wellbore integrity problems induced during loss of control situations and helps create workflows for predicting possible broaching scenarios during the post-blowout capping stage. Dimensionless plots are used to present fracture initiation for different cases—this is useful for drilling and wellbore integrity engineers for making contingency plans for dealing with loss of well control situations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SPE Drilling & Completion
SPE Drilling & Completion 工程技术-工程:石油
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
29
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Covers horizontal and directional drilling, drilling fluids, bit technology, sand control, perforating, cementing, well control, completions and drilling operations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信