通过共享酸性物质的合作学习模式培育沟通技巧

Dea Sarah Tia, M. Muchlis
{"title":"通过共享酸性物质的合作学习模式培育沟通技巧","authors":"Dea Sarah Tia, M. Muchlis","doi":"10.26740/UJCED.V9N3.P324-333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tujuan penelitian ini dibuat untuk mendeskripsikan keterlaksanaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipeThink Pair Share (TPS), aktivitas peserta didik, keterampilan komunikasi yang berupa kualitas dankuantitas, ketuntasan hasil belajar dan respon dari peserta didik setelah diterapkannya modelpembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS di SMAN 17 Surabaya. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah “OneShoot Case Study” dengan subyek penelitian yaitu peserta didik kelas XI IPA 1. Data hasil.penelitianmenunjukkan bahwa (1) Keterlaksanaan sintaks model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe (TPS) tiap pertemuanmemperoleh kategori sangat baik, dengan skor nilai rata-rata pertemuan 1, 2 dan 3 berturut-turut sebesar3,6; 3,75; dan 4. (2) Aktivitas peserta didik yang relevan rata-rata pertemuan 1, 2 dan 3 berturut-turutsebesar 98,12%; 99,17%; dan 99,3%. (3) Keterampilan komunikasi yang berupa kuantitas bertanya padapertemuan 1, 2 dan 3 berturut-turut persentasenya sebesar 28,1%; 50%; dan 56,2% dengan kriteria cukupbaik. Kuantitas berpendapat persentase 43,7%; 62,5%; dan 65,6% dengan kriteria cukup baik. Kualitasberpendapat dengan kriteria baik sebanyak 37,5%; 56,25%; dan 59,37%. Keterampilan komunikasi yangberupa kualitas bertanya, mendapat kriteria baik sebanyak 0%, 6,25%, dan 6,25%. (4) Peserta didikmengalami ketuntasan hasil belajar dengan mendapatkan persen ketuntasan 86,18%. (5) Hasil angketrespon peserta didik terhadap penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Think Pair Share (TPS)memperoleh hasil respon yang positif dengan persentase seluruh item ≥ 61%.Kata Kunci: Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS), Keterampilan Komunikasi, Asam Basa \nAbstractThe purpose of this study was made to describe the implementation of the Think Pair Share (TPS) type ofcooperative learning model, students' activities, communication skills in the form of quality and quantity,completeness of learning outcomes and responses of students after the application of the type ofcooperative learning model at SMAN 17 Surabaya. The research design used was \"One Shoot CaseStudy\" with research subjects namely students of class XI IPA 1. Research data shows that (1) The syntaxof the type of cooperative learning model (TPS) at each meeting obtained a very good category, withscores the average meeting 1, 2 and 3 in a row of 3.6; 3.75; and 4. (2) Activities of relevant studentsaveraging meetings 1, 2 and 3 respectively at 98.12%; 99.17%; and 99.3%. (3) Communication skills inthe form of quantity asking questions at meetings 1, 2 and 3 in a row the percentage is 28.1%; 50%; and56.2% with quite good criteria. Quantity holds the percentage of 43.7%; 62.5%; and 65.6% with quitegood criteria. Quality of opinion with good criteria as much as 37.5%; 56.25%; and 59.37%.Communication skills in the form of quality questions, get good criteria as much as 0%, 6.25%, and6.25%. (4) Students experience mastery of learning outcomes by getting 86.18%. (5) The results ofstudents' questionnaire responses to the application of the Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learningmodel obtained positive response results with the percentage of all items ≥ 61%.Key Words: Cooperative Learning, Think Pair Share Type (TPS), Communication Skills, Acid and Bases","PeriodicalId":31518,"journal":{"name":"Unesa Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"10 5","pages":"324-333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MELATIHKAN KETERAMPILAN KOMUNIKASI MELALUI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI ASAM BASA\",\"authors\":\"Dea Sarah Tia, M. Muchlis\",\"doi\":\"10.26740/UJCED.V9N3.P324-333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tujuan penelitian ini dibuat untuk mendeskripsikan keterlaksanaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipeThink Pair Share (TPS), aktivitas peserta didik, keterampilan komunikasi yang berupa kualitas dankuantitas, ketuntasan hasil belajar dan respon dari peserta didik setelah diterapkannya modelpembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS di SMAN 17 Surabaya. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah “OneShoot Case Study” dengan subyek penelitian yaitu peserta didik kelas XI IPA 1. Data hasil.penelitianmenunjukkan bahwa (1) Keterlaksanaan sintaks model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe (TPS) tiap pertemuanmemperoleh kategori sangat baik, dengan skor nilai rata-rata pertemuan 1, 2 dan 3 berturut-turut sebesar3,6; 3,75; dan 4. (2) Aktivitas peserta didik yang relevan rata-rata pertemuan 1, 2 dan 3 berturut-turutsebesar 98,12%; 99,17%; dan 99,3%. (3) Keterampilan komunikasi yang berupa kuantitas bertanya padapertemuan 1, 2 dan 3 berturut-turut persentasenya sebesar 28,1%; 50%; dan 56,2% dengan kriteria cukupbaik. Kuantitas berpendapat persentase 43,7%; 62,5%; dan 65,6% dengan kriteria cukup baik. Kualitasberpendapat dengan kriteria baik sebanyak 37,5%; 56,25%; dan 59,37%. Keterampilan komunikasi yangberupa kualitas bertanya, mendapat kriteria baik sebanyak 0%, 6,25%, dan 6,25%. (4) Peserta didikmengalami ketuntasan hasil belajar dengan mendapatkan persen ketuntasan 86,18%. (5) Hasil angketrespon peserta didik terhadap penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Think Pair Share (TPS)memperoleh hasil respon yang positif dengan persentase seluruh item ≥ 61%.Kata Kunci: Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS), Keterampilan Komunikasi, Asam Basa \\nAbstractThe purpose of this study was made to describe the implementation of the Think Pair Share (TPS) type ofcooperative learning model, students' activities, communication skills in the form of quality and quantity,completeness of learning outcomes and responses of students after the application of the type ofcooperative learning model at SMAN 17 Surabaya. The research design used was \\\"One Shoot CaseStudy\\\" with research subjects namely students of class XI IPA 1. Research data shows that (1) The syntaxof the type of cooperative learning model (TPS) at each meeting obtained a very good category, withscores the average meeting 1, 2 and 3 in a row of 3.6; 3.75; and 4. (2) Activities of relevant studentsaveraging meetings 1, 2 and 3 respectively at 98.12%; 99.17%; and 99.3%. (3) Communication skills inthe form of quantity asking questions at meetings 1, 2 and 3 in a row the percentage is 28.1%; 50%; and56.2% with quite good criteria. Quantity holds the percentage of 43.7%; 62.5%; and 65.6% with quitegood criteria. Quality of opinion with good criteria as much as 37.5%; 56.25%; and 59.37%.Communication skills in the form of quality questions, get good criteria as much as 0%, 6.25%, and6.25%. (4) Students experience mastery of learning outcomes by getting 86.18%. (5) The results ofstudents' questionnaire responses to the application of the Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learningmodel obtained positive response results with the percentage of all items ≥ 61%.Key Words: Cooperative Learning, Think Pair Share Type (TPS), Communication Skills, Acid and Bases\",\"PeriodicalId\":31518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Unesa Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"324-333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Unesa Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26740/UJCED.V9N3.P324-333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unesa Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26740/UJCED.V9N3.P324-333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是描述在TPS第17章泗水svr上对合作型教师学习模式(TPS)、学习者活动、质量与数量的沟通技能、学习者的学习和反应等方面的反馈。用于研究设计的研究对象是十一读本研究员。数据结果。研究表明(1)每个会议的合作学习模式(TPS)的智慧获得了一个非常好的类别,平均会议得分为1、2和3次;375;和4。(2)相关学者活动平均为1、2和3次聚会次数增加了98.12%;99,17%;和99,3%。(3)交流技能的数量连续询问1、2和3次会议的百分比为281%;50%;符合合理标准的56.2%。数量是43.7%;62,5%;标准是65.6%。条件依据良好的标准是37.5%;56,25%;和59,37%。高质量的沟通技巧要求,达到0%、6.25%和6.25%的良好标准。(4)参与者通过获得86.18%的受孕率,被口述学习结果。(5) angketrespon学习者对学习模式应用的合作结果认为双分享类型(TPS)获得了积极的响应结果的整个比例≥61%的项目。关键词:合作社认为双分享类型(TPS),沟通技巧,酸碱性AbstractThe这个研究的目的是为了描述implementation》想制造双ofcooperative型(TPS)学习模式,学生分享”活动,技能in the form of communication的质量和数量,completeness学习outcomes》和学生“回嘴ofcooperative学习模型at型应用程序》(time after斯曼17泗水。研究人员使用的研究对象是西科学院的学生学生“一枪一弹”。研究数据展示的是(1)在每次会议上建立了一个非常好的决策、平均会议1、2和3排;3 . 75;和第四师。(2)相关学生活动1、2和3尊重在98.12%;99 . 17%;和99。3%。(3)在会议一、二、三排的问题上,通信技术的问题是28.1%;50%;非常好的扭体。数量保持着43.7%;62 . 5%;和65.6%的quitegood女士。意见质量为37.5%;56 . 25%;59和37%。高品质问题的沟通技巧,让好的签柜尽可能多地为0%,6.25%,6.25%。(4)学生的学习体验超过86.18%。(5)《results ofstudents‘questionnaire回嘴说到应用程序》认为双(TPS)合作分享learningmodel获得积极反应results都with The percentage of The items≥61%。关键字:合作学习,思考配对类型(TPS),沟通技能,Acid和Bases
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MELATIHKAN KETERAMPILAN KOMUNIKASI MELALUI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI ASAM BASA
Tujuan penelitian ini dibuat untuk mendeskripsikan keterlaksanaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipeThink Pair Share (TPS), aktivitas peserta didik, keterampilan komunikasi yang berupa kualitas dankuantitas, ketuntasan hasil belajar dan respon dari peserta didik setelah diterapkannya modelpembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS di SMAN 17 Surabaya. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah “OneShoot Case Study” dengan subyek penelitian yaitu peserta didik kelas XI IPA 1. Data hasil.penelitianmenunjukkan bahwa (1) Keterlaksanaan sintaks model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe (TPS) tiap pertemuanmemperoleh kategori sangat baik, dengan skor nilai rata-rata pertemuan 1, 2 dan 3 berturut-turut sebesar3,6; 3,75; dan 4. (2) Aktivitas peserta didik yang relevan rata-rata pertemuan 1, 2 dan 3 berturut-turutsebesar 98,12%; 99,17%; dan 99,3%. (3) Keterampilan komunikasi yang berupa kuantitas bertanya padapertemuan 1, 2 dan 3 berturut-turut persentasenya sebesar 28,1%; 50%; dan 56,2% dengan kriteria cukupbaik. Kuantitas berpendapat persentase 43,7%; 62,5%; dan 65,6% dengan kriteria cukup baik. Kualitasberpendapat dengan kriteria baik sebanyak 37,5%; 56,25%; dan 59,37%. Keterampilan komunikasi yangberupa kualitas bertanya, mendapat kriteria baik sebanyak 0%, 6,25%, dan 6,25%. (4) Peserta didikmengalami ketuntasan hasil belajar dengan mendapatkan persen ketuntasan 86,18%. (5) Hasil angketrespon peserta didik terhadap penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Think Pair Share (TPS)memperoleh hasil respon yang positif dengan persentase seluruh item ≥ 61%.Kata Kunci: Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS), Keterampilan Komunikasi, Asam Basa AbstractThe purpose of this study was made to describe the implementation of the Think Pair Share (TPS) type ofcooperative learning model, students' activities, communication skills in the form of quality and quantity,completeness of learning outcomes and responses of students after the application of the type ofcooperative learning model at SMAN 17 Surabaya. The research design used was "One Shoot CaseStudy" with research subjects namely students of class XI IPA 1. Research data shows that (1) The syntaxof the type of cooperative learning model (TPS) at each meeting obtained a very good category, withscores the average meeting 1, 2 and 3 in a row of 3.6; 3.75; and 4. (2) Activities of relevant studentsaveraging meetings 1, 2 and 3 respectively at 98.12%; 99.17%; and 99.3%. (3) Communication skills inthe form of quantity asking questions at meetings 1, 2 and 3 in a row the percentage is 28.1%; 50%; and56.2% with quite good criteria. Quantity holds the percentage of 43.7%; 62.5%; and 65.6% with quitegood criteria. Quality of opinion with good criteria as much as 37.5%; 56.25%; and 59.37%.Communication skills in the form of quality questions, get good criteria as much as 0%, 6.25%, and6.25%. (4) Students experience mastery of learning outcomes by getting 86.18%. (5) The results ofstudents' questionnaire responses to the application of the Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learningmodel obtained positive response results with the percentage of all items ≥ 61%.Key Words: Cooperative Learning, Think Pair Share Type (TPS), Communication Skills, Acid and Bases
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信