自我耗竭是阻碍:控制沟通的挑战和监管焦点理论在可持续目标追求中的作用

IF 3.1 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Tatiana Anisimova, Soniya Billore, P. Kitchen
{"title":"自我耗竭是阻碍:控制沟通的挑战和监管焦点理论在可持续目标追求中的作用","authors":"Tatiana Anisimova, Soniya Billore, P. Kitchen","doi":"10.1108/jcom-10-2022-0117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeVia the lens of the ego-depletion phenomenon (Baumeister et al., 1998) and Higgins' (1998) regulatory focus theory, this paper seeks to explain why current controlled communications are failing to achieve coherence between people's free will and their actions pursuing sustainable goals in a society. This paper explains how ego-depletion triggered by controlled communications can lead to confusion and decision fatigue in a society, thus potentially sabotaging people's participation in sustainable behaviour.Design/methodology/approachThe authors applied Jaakkola's (2020) theory synthesis approach to integrate concepts from previously unconnected disciplines in order to generate novel insights in the area of controlled communication management.FindingsThe authors develop a theoretical framework and present research propositions that can help advance research and the discourse at the intersection of controlled communication and self-regulation theories.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper possesses the limitations associated with conceptual papers, e.g. the lack of empirical support of the study’s conceptual arguments.Practical implicationsThis paper generates novel insights to assist communication practitioners and policymakers to improve vehicles and mechanisms of controlled communication with the public regarding sustainable goals pursuit.Originality/valueTo the best of authors' knowledge, this is one of the first papers that has merged the domains of self-regulation, ego-depletion, and controlled communication in an integrative framework in order to explain the mechanisms of how to enhance the effectiveness of controlled communication associated with sustainable goals pursuit.","PeriodicalId":51660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Management","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ego-depletion is in the way: the challenges of controlled communication and the role of the regulatory focus theory in sustainable goals pursuit\",\"authors\":\"Tatiana Anisimova, Soniya Billore, P. Kitchen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jcom-10-2022-0117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeVia the lens of the ego-depletion phenomenon (Baumeister et al., 1998) and Higgins' (1998) regulatory focus theory, this paper seeks to explain why current controlled communications are failing to achieve coherence between people's free will and their actions pursuing sustainable goals in a society. This paper explains how ego-depletion triggered by controlled communications can lead to confusion and decision fatigue in a society, thus potentially sabotaging people's participation in sustainable behaviour.Design/methodology/approachThe authors applied Jaakkola's (2020) theory synthesis approach to integrate concepts from previously unconnected disciplines in order to generate novel insights in the area of controlled communication management.FindingsThe authors develop a theoretical framework and present research propositions that can help advance research and the discourse at the intersection of controlled communication and self-regulation theories.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper possesses the limitations associated with conceptual papers, e.g. the lack of empirical support of the study’s conceptual arguments.Practical implicationsThis paper generates novel insights to assist communication practitioners and policymakers to improve vehicles and mechanisms of controlled communication with the public regarding sustainable goals pursuit.Originality/valueTo the best of authors' knowledge, this is one of the first papers that has merged the domains of self-regulation, ego-depletion, and controlled communication in an integrative framework in order to explain the mechanisms of how to enhance the effectiveness of controlled communication associated with sustainable goals pursuit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Communication Management\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Communication Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-10-2022-0117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-10-2022-0117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过自我耗竭现象(Baumeister et al.,1998)和Higgins(1998)的调节焦点理论,本文试图解释为什么当前受控的沟通未能实现人们在社会中追求可持续目标的自由意志和行动之间的一致性。本文解释了受控沟通引发的自我耗竭如何导致社会中的困惑和决策疲劳,从而可能破坏人们对可持续行为的参与。设计/方法论/方法作者应用Jaakkola(2020)的理论综合方法来整合以前不相关学科的概念,以在受控通信管理领域产生新的见解。发现作者建立了一个理论框架,并提出了有助于推进控制沟通和自我调节理论交叉点的研究和话语的研究主张。研究局限性/含义本文具有与概念论文相关的局限性,例如缺乏对研究概念论点的实证支持。实际含义本文产生了新的见解,以帮助传播从业者和政策制定者改进与公众就可持续目标追求进行受控沟通的工具和机制。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一篇将自我调节、自我消耗和受控沟通领域合并在一个综合框架中的论文之一,目的是解释如何提高与可持续目标追求相关的受控沟通的有效性的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ego-depletion is in the way: the challenges of controlled communication and the role of the regulatory focus theory in sustainable goals pursuit
PurposeVia the lens of the ego-depletion phenomenon (Baumeister et al., 1998) and Higgins' (1998) regulatory focus theory, this paper seeks to explain why current controlled communications are failing to achieve coherence between people's free will and their actions pursuing sustainable goals in a society. This paper explains how ego-depletion triggered by controlled communications can lead to confusion and decision fatigue in a society, thus potentially sabotaging people's participation in sustainable behaviour.Design/methodology/approachThe authors applied Jaakkola's (2020) theory synthesis approach to integrate concepts from previously unconnected disciplines in order to generate novel insights in the area of controlled communication management.FindingsThe authors develop a theoretical framework and present research propositions that can help advance research and the discourse at the intersection of controlled communication and self-regulation theories.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper possesses the limitations associated with conceptual papers, e.g. the lack of empirical support of the study’s conceptual arguments.Practical implicationsThis paper generates novel insights to assist communication practitioners and policymakers to improve vehicles and mechanisms of controlled communication with the public regarding sustainable goals pursuit.Originality/valueTo the best of authors' knowledge, this is one of the first papers that has merged the domains of self-regulation, ego-depletion, and controlled communication in an integrative framework in order to explain the mechanisms of how to enhance the effectiveness of controlled communication associated with sustainable goals pursuit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信