另类事实,假新闻,相互矛盾的看法,以及它们与图书馆和信息专业人员的相关性

Q2 Social Sciences
Bill Crowley
{"title":"另类事实,假新闻,相互矛盾的看法,以及它们与图书馆和信息专业人员的相关性","authors":"Bill Crowley","doi":"10.1515/opis-2019-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article addresses contemporary and emerging issues involving perceptions of “truth,” particularly truth in social networking and other web environments. It is a work primarily tackling issues concerning perceptions of truth in the United States of America with a lesser emphasis on their impact on other developed nations. Heuristics (trial and error lessons) derived from the author’s tacit knowledge gained in the political arena communicating factual information to legislators and their staff under the American constitutional right to petition for “redress of grievances” are provided. Research dealing with the well-documented predisposition of people, both well and poorly-educated, to seek out information supporting their existing views is considered. Also reviewed are the implications of the increased availability of disinformation and misinformation from hostile, mercenary, illegal, alt-right, alt-left and other contentious online sources. The essay concludes with the examination of the feasibility of a spectrum of possible roles to be played by libraries and information centers and their personnel in support of a broader identification and provision of validated facts at a time of overabundance in often unreliable electronic information.","PeriodicalId":32626,"journal":{"name":"Open Information Science","volume":"112 1","pages":"209 - 221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/opis-2019-0015","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative Facts, Fake News, Conflicting Perceptions, & Their Relevance to Library and Information Professionals\",\"authors\":\"Bill Crowley\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/opis-2019-0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article addresses contemporary and emerging issues involving perceptions of “truth,” particularly truth in social networking and other web environments. It is a work primarily tackling issues concerning perceptions of truth in the United States of America with a lesser emphasis on their impact on other developed nations. Heuristics (trial and error lessons) derived from the author’s tacit knowledge gained in the political arena communicating factual information to legislators and their staff under the American constitutional right to petition for “redress of grievances” are provided. Research dealing with the well-documented predisposition of people, both well and poorly-educated, to seek out information supporting their existing views is considered. Also reviewed are the implications of the increased availability of disinformation and misinformation from hostile, mercenary, illegal, alt-right, alt-left and other contentious online sources. The essay concludes with the examination of the feasibility of a spectrum of possible roles to be played by libraries and information centers and their personnel in support of a broader identification and provision of validated facts at a time of overabundance in often unreliable electronic information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Information Science\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"209 - 221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/opis-2019-0015\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Information Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2019-0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2019-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文讨论了当代和新兴的问题,涉及对“真相”的感知,特别是社交网络和其他网络环境中的真相。这项工作主要解决美利坚合众国对真相的看法问题,较少强调这些看法对其他发达国家的影响。根据美国宪法规定的请愿“平反冤屈”的权利,提供了从提交人在政治舞台上获得的隐性知识中获得的启发(试错教训),向立法者及其工作人员传达事实信息。研究涉及受教育程度高和受教育程度低的人寻求支持其现有观点的信息的倾向。还审查了来自敌对、雇佣军、非法、另类右翼、另类左翼和其他有争议的网络来源的虚假信息和错误信息的增加所带来的影响。文章最后审查了图书馆和信息中心及其工作人员在经常不可靠的电子信息过多的情况下发挥一系列可能作用的可行性,以支持更广泛地识别和提供经验证的事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alternative Facts, Fake News, Conflicting Perceptions, & Their Relevance to Library and Information Professionals
Abstract This article addresses contemporary and emerging issues involving perceptions of “truth,” particularly truth in social networking and other web environments. It is a work primarily tackling issues concerning perceptions of truth in the United States of America with a lesser emphasis on their impact on other developed nations. Heuristics (trial and error lessons) derived from the author’s tacit knowledge gained in the political arena communicating factual information to legislators and their staff under the American constitutional right to petition for “redress of grievances” are provided. Research dealing with the well-documented predisposition of people, both well and poorly-educated, to seek out information supporting their existing views is considered. Also reviewed are the implications of the increased availability of disinformation and misinformation from hostile, mercenary, illegal, alt-right, alt-left and other contentious online sources. The essay concludes with the examination of the feasibility of a spectrum of possible roles to be played by libraries and information centers and their personnel in support of a broader identification and provision of validated facts at a time of overabundance in often unreliable electronic information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Information Science
Open Information Science Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信