多准则决策、统计和机器学习模型在越南延白省Van Yen地区滑坡易感性制图中的比较

Q4 Social Sciences
{"title":"多准则决策、统计和机器学习模型在越南延白省Van Yen地区滑坡易感性制图中的比较","authors":"","doi":"10.52939/ijg.v19i7.2743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Landslides are natural hazards that pose a significant threat to human lives and infrastructure. Landslide susceptibility mapping aims to classify areas at risk of landslides. Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) algorithms have the advantage of incorporating expert opinions, while Statistics and Machine Learning models demonstrate greater objectivity. This study compares three representative models, namely Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Frequency Ratio (FR), and Random Forest (RF), for developing a landslide susceptibility model in Van Yen District, Yen Bai Province. The classification points for landslides were divided into a 70% training set and a 30% testing set. Thirteen conditioning factors were used to evaluate the landslide's influences. The results show that the AHP and FR models perform well with AUC = 0.842 and AUC = 0.852, respectively, while the RF model outperforms them with AUC = 0.949. The study demonstrates the applicability of these models for analyzing landslide susceptibility in the research area, highlighting the strong potential of machine learning models.","PeriodicalId":38707,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geoinformatics","volume":"68 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Statistics, and Machine Learning Models for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Van Yen District, Yen Bai Province, Vietnam\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.52939/ijg.v19i7.2743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Landslides are natural hazards that pose a significant threat to human lives and infrastructure. Landslide susceptibility mapping aims to classify areas at risk of landslides. Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) algorithms have the advantage of incorporating expert opinions, while Statistics and Machine Learning models demonstrate greater objectivity. This study compares three representative models, namely Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Frequency Ratio (FR), and Random Forest (RF), for developing a landslide susceptibility model in Van Yen District, Yen Bai Province. The classification points for landslides were divided into a 70% training set and a 30% testing set. Thirteen conditioning factors were used to evaluate the landslide's influences. The results show that the AHP and FR models perform well with AUC = 0.842 and AUC = 0.852, respectively, while the RF model outperforms them with AUC = 0.949. The study demonstrates the applicability of these models for analyzing landslide susceptibility in the research area, highlighting the strong potential of machine learning models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Geoinformatics\",\"volume\":\"68 25\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Geoinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52939/ijg.v19i7.2743\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geoinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52939/ijg.v19i7.2743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

滑坡是对人类生命和基础设施构成重大威胁的自然灾害。滑坡易发性绘图旨在对有滑坡风险的区域进行分类。多准则决策(MCDM)算法具有结合专家意见的优势,而统计学和机器学习模型则表现出更大的客观性。本研究比较了三个具有代表性的模型,即层次分析法(AHP)、频率比(FR)和随机森林(RF),以开发颜白省范延区的滑坡易感性模型。滑坡的分类点分为70%的训练集和30%的测试集。采用13个条件因子对滑坡的影响进行了评价。结果表明,AHP和FR模型分别表现良好,AUC=0.842和AUC=0.852,而RF模型的AUC=0.949优于它们。该研究证明了这些模型在研究区域分析滑坡易感性方面的适用性,突出了机器学习模型的强大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Statistics, and Machine Learning Models for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Van Yen District, Yen Bai Province, Vietnam
Landslides are natural hazards that pose a significant threat to human lives and infrastructure. Landslide susceptibility mapping aims to classify areas at risk of landslides. Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) algorithms have the advantage of incorporating expert opinions, while Statistics and Machine Learning models demonstrate greater objectivity. This study compares three representative models, namely Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Frequency Ratio (FR), and Random Forest (RF), for developing a landslide susceptibility model in Van Yen District, Yen Bai Province. The classification points for landslides were divided into a 70% training set and a 30% testing set. Thirteen conditioning factors were used to evaluate the landslide's influences. The results show that the AHP and FR models perform well with AUC = 0.842 and AUC = 0.852, respectively, while the RF model outperforms them with AUC = 0.949. The study demonstrates the applicability of these models for analyzing landslide susceptibility in the research area, highlighting the strong potential of machine learning models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Geoinformatics
International Journal of Geoinformatics Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信