中小学教师绩效工资对学生学习成绩的影响分析

International Review of Public Administration Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/12294659.2022.2071541

Jisung Yoo, Moonyoung Eom

{"title":"中小学教师绩效工资对学生学习成绩的影响分析","authors":"Jisung Yoo, Moonyoung Eom","doi":"10.1080/12294659.2022.2071541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to empirically analyze the influence of merit payment on student achievement in South Korea, specifically the proportion of students with above-average test scores and the proportion of students with below-average test scores over six years (2011–2016). EduData Service System (EDSS) school-level panel data was utilized for analysis, which included pooled OLS, a fixed-effects model, and a two-way fixed-effects model. The results of the fixed-effects model showed that merit payment in Korea likely increases the proportion of students with high proficiency in Korean and English, but tends not to reduce the proportion of students with low proficiency in Korean, English, and math. However, the results of the two-way fixed effects model indicated that merit payment has no statistically significant effect on the proportion of students with above-average or below-average test scores in Korean, English, and math. Recommendations for policymakers, researchers, and educators are provided.","PeriodicalId":39993,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Public Administration","volume":"23 7","pages":"73 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Merit payment for elementary, middle, and high school teachers: analysis of its effects on student academic achievement\",\"authors\":\"Jisung Yoo, Moonyoung Eom\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/12294659.2022.2071541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to empirically analyze the influence of merit payment on student achievement in South Korea, specifically the proportion of students with above-average test scores and the proportion of students with below-average test scores over six years (2011–2016). EduData Service System (EDSS) school-level panel data was utilized for analysis, which included pooled OLS, a fixed-effects model, and a two-way fixed-effects model. The results of the fixed-effects model showed that merit payment in Korea likely increases the proportion of students with high proficiency in Korean and English, but tends not to reduce the proportion of students with low proficiency in Korean, English, and math. However, the results of the two-way fixed effects model indicated that merit payment has no statistically significant effect on the proportion of students with above-average or below-average test scores in Korean, English, and math. Recommendations for policymakers, researchers, and educators are provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Public Administration\",\"volume\":\"23 7\",\"pages\":\"73 - 90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Public Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2022.2071541\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2022.2071541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究的目的是实证分析成绩支付对韩国学生成绩的影响，特别是六年（2011-2016年）内考试成绩高于平均水平的学生比例和考试成绩低于平均水平的比例。利用教育数据服务系统（EDSS）学校层面的小组数据进行分析，其中包括合并OLS、固定效应模型和双向固定效应模型。固定效应模型的结果表明，韩国的择优录取可能会增加韩语和英语水平较高的学生比例，但不会减少韩语、英语和数学水平较低的学生比例。然而，双向固定效应模型的结果表明，成绩支付对韩国语、英语和数学考试成绩高于平均水平或低于平均水平的学生比例没有统计学上的显著影响。为政策制定者、研究人员和教育工作者提供了建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Merit payment for elementary, middle, and high school teachers: analysis of its effects on student academic achievement

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to empirically analyze the influence of merit payment on student achievement in South Korea, specifically the proportion of students with above-average test scores and the proportion of students with below-average test scores over six years (2011–2016). EduData Service System (EDSS) school-level panel data was utilized for analysis, which included pooled OLS, a fixed-effects model, and a two-way fixed-effects model. The results of the fixed-effects model showed that merit payment in Korea likely increases the proportion of students with high proficiency in Korean and English, but tends not to reduce the proportion of students with low proficiency in Korean, English, and math. However, the results of the two-way fixed effects model indicated that merit payment has no statistically significant effect on the proportion of students with above-average or below-average test scores in Korean, English, and math. Recommendations for policymakers, researchers, and educators are provided.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Review of Public Administration Social Sciences-Public Administration

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The International Review of Public Administration (ISSN 1229-4659) is published biannually by the Korean Association for Public Administration (KAPA) to provide a worldwide audience with the opportunity for communication and further understanding on issues of public administration and policy. There will be a triple-blind peer review process for all submissions of articles of general interest. There are no particular limitations on subject areas as long as they are related to the field of public administration and policy or deal with public employees. Articles should be analytic and demonstrate the highest standards of excellence in conceptualization, craftsmanship, and methodology.