衡量价值:解放后奴隶种族资本主义的遗产

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
A. Kleintop
{"title":"衡量价值:解放后奴隶种族资本主义的遗产","authors":"A. Kleintop","doi":"10.1353/rah.2021.0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the publication of Walter Johnson’s River of Dark Dreams (2013), Ed Baptist’s The Half Has Never Been Told (2014), and Sven Beckert’s Empire of Cotton (2014), the new history of capitalism has contributed to scholarly and public conversations about enslavement’s relationship to the growth of capitalism in the United States. These histories highlight the complex legal and financial systems that the peculiar institution engendered. Before the Civil War, people could buy, sell, and mortgage property in humans, generating massive profits for enslavers, bankers, and others. In light of this research, a growing group of scholars has reconsidered the process of emancipation in the South. Formal abolition may have ended the legalized trade in Black bodies, but what happened to the legal and financial practices that the value of enslaved people necessitated? Aaron Carico’s Black Market: The Slave’s Value in National Culture after 1865 is one of the first books to answer this question. Carico argues that formal abolition did not end the commodification of Black bodies or their representations as relations of exchange, accumulation, and domination in U.S. culture. “Though no longer chattel,” he says, “blacks in America weren’t relieved of the commodity’s mark. Blackness is realized in a historical matrix of economic exchange and cultural production, a real abstraction” (p. 9). Black Market is a work of cultural criticism that contributes to American Studies and interdisciplinary studies of racial capitalism. Carico explores eclectic texts like court cases, paintings, performances, photographs, novels, poetry, and music. This broad source base puts the book in conversation with U.S. and art historians, legal and literary scholars, and especially historians of capitalism. The book’s theoretical framework relies on analyses of slave racial capitalism, a coin termed by Johnson in River of Dark Dreams to denote how race-based enslavement enabled and required westward expansion in the antebellum era. Carico also pulls from Black radical thinkers and Afro-","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"48 6","pages":"561 - 568"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Value: The Legacies of Slave Racial Capitalism after Emancipation\",\"authors\":\"A. Kleintop\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/rah.2021.0053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the publication of Walter Johnson’s River of Dark Dreams (2013), Ed Baptist’s The Half Has Never Been Told (2014), and Sven Beckert’s Empire of Cotton (2014), the new history of capitalism has contributed to scholarly and public conversations about enslavement’s relationship to the growth of capitalism in the United States. These histories highlight the complex legal and financial systems that the peculiar institution engendered. Before the Civil War, people could buy, sell, and mortgage property in humans, generating massive profits for enslavers, bankers, and others. In light of this research, a growing group of scholars has reconsidered the process of emancipation in the South. Formal abolition may have ended the legalized trade in Black bodies, but what happened to the legal and financial practices that the value of enslaved people necessitated? Aaron Carico’s Black Market: The Slave’s Value in National Culture after 1865 is one of the first books to answer this question. Carico argues that formal abolition did not end the commodification of Black bodies or their representations as relations of exchange, accumulation, and domination in U.S. culture. “Though no longer chattel,” he says, “blacks in America weren’t relieved of the commodity’s mark. Blackness is realized in a historical matrix of economic exchange and cultural production, a real abstraction” (p. 9). Black Market is a work of cultural criticism that contributes to American Studies and interdisciplinary studies of racial capitalism. Carico explores eclectic texts like court cases, paintings, performances, photographs, novels, poetry, and music. This broad source base puts the book in conversation with U.S. and art historians, legal and literary scholars, and especially historians of capitalism. The book’s theoretical framework relies on analyses of slave racial capitalism, a coin termed by Johnson in River of Dark Dreams to denote how race-based enslavement enabled and required westward expansion in the antebellum era. Carico also pulls from Black radical thinkers and Afro-\",\"PeriodicalId\":43597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"48 6\",\"pages\":\"561 - 568\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2021.0053\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2021.0053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自从沃尔特·约翰逊的《黑暗之梦之河》(2013年)、埃德·浸会的《一半从未被说过》(2014年)和斯文·贝克特的《棉花帝国》(2014年)出版以来,资本主义的新历史为学术和公众讨论奴隶制与美国资本主义发展的关系做出了贡献。这些历史突出了这个特殊机构所产生的复杂的法律和金融体系。在南北战争之前,人们可以买卖和抵押人类财产,为奴隶主、银行家和其他人带来巨额利润。根据这一研究,越来越多的学者重新思考南方解放的过程。正式废除黑奴制度可能终结了贩卖黑人尸体的合法交易,但奴隶的价值所必需的法律和金融实践发生了什么变化?亚伦·卡里科的《黑市:1865年后奴隶在民族文化中的价值》是最早回答这个问题的书之一。卡里科认为,正式的废除并没有结束黑人身体的商品化,也没有结束他们在美国文化中作为交换、积累和统治关系的表现。“虽然不再是动产,”他说,“美国的黑人并没有摆脱商品的标记。黑人是在经济交换和文化生产的历史矩阵中实现的,是一种真正的抽象”(第9页)。《黑市》是一部文化批评作品,对美国研究和种族资本主义的跨学科研究做出了贡献。卡里科探索了法庭案件、绘画、表演、照片、小说、诗歌和音乐等不拘一格的文本。这个广泛的来源基础使这本书与美国和艺术史学家,法律和文学学者,特别是资本主义历史学家进行了对话。这本书的理论框架依赖于对奴隶种族资本主义的分析。奴隶种族资本主义是约翰逊在《黑暗之梦之河》中提出的一种概念,用来表示战前以种族为基础的奴隶制是如何促使和要求美国向西扩张的。卡里科还吸收了黑人激进思想家和非洲裔美国人的思想
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring Value: The Legacies of Slave Racial Capitalism after Emancipation
Since the publication of Walter Johnson’s River of Dark Dreams (2013), Ed Baptist’s The Half Has Never Been Told (2014), and Sven Beckert’s Empire of Cotton (2014), the new history of capitalism has contributed to scholarly and public conversations about enslavement’s relationship to the growth of capitalism in the United States. These histories highlight the complex legal and financial systems that the peculiar institution engendered. Before the Civil War, people could buy, sell, and mortgage property in humans, generating massive profits for enslavers, bankers, and others. In light of this research, a growing group of scholars has reconsidered the process of emancipation in the South. Formal abolition may have ended the legalized trade in Black bodies, but what happened to the legal and financial practices that the value of enslaved people necessitated? Aaron Carico’s Black Market: The Slave’s Value in National Culture after 1865 is one of the first books to answer this question. Carico argues that formal abolition did not end the commodification of Black bodies or their representations as relations of exchange, accumulation, and domination in U.S. culture. “Though no longer chattel,” he says, “blacks in America weren’t relieved of the commodity’s mark. Blackness is realized in a historical matrix of economic exchange and cultural production, a real abstraction” (p. 9). Black Market is a work of cultural criticism that contributes to American Studies and interdisciplinary studies of racial capitalism. Carico explores eclectic texts like court cases, paintings, performances, photographs, novels, poetry, and music. This broad source base puts the book in conversation with U.S. and art historians, legal and literary scholars, and especially historians of capitalism. The book’s theoretical framework relies on analyses of slave racial capitalism, a coin termed by Johnson in River of Dark Dreams to denote how race-based enslavement enabled and required westward expansion in the antebellum era. Carico also pulls from Black radical thinkers and Afro-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Reviews in American History provides an effective means for scholars and students of American history to stay up to date in their discipline. Each issue presents in-depth reviews of over thirty of the newest books in American history. Retrospective essays examining landmark works by major historians are also regularly featured. The journal covers all areas of American history including economics, military history, women in history, law, political history and philosophy, religion, social history, intellectual history, and cultural history. Readers can expect continued coverage of both traditional and new subjects of American history, always blending the recognition of recent developments with the ongoing importance of the core matter of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信