与腹部再干预和VAC治疗相关的外伤性开放性腹部肠大气瘘。

Jesús E Rodríguez-Silverio, Luis M García-Núñez, Edgar F Hernández-García, Héctor F Noyola-Villalobos, Luis F Moreno-Delagado
{"title":"与腹部再干预和VAC治疗相关的外伤性开放性腹部肠大气瘘。","authors":"Jesús E Rodríguez-Silverio,&nbsp;Luis M García-Núñez,&nbsp;Edgar F Hernández-García,&nbsp;Héctor F Noyola-Villalobos,&nbsp;Luis F Moreno-Delagado","doi":"10.24875/CIRU.22000419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Open abdomen is an alternative for the management of trauma patient, and negative pressure therapy of the wound using VAC<sup>®</sup> device is a genuine sort of treatment. Although the device poses technical advantages, risks are present and a critical complication is the enteroatmospheric fistula formation (EAF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analize the role of negative pressure therapy length and VAC<sup>®</sup> device number of changes on the EAF formation in trauma patients udergoing open abdomen.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cut-off points were calculated using receiver operational characteristics curve. Values were compared with Student's t or Mann-Withney U tests, considering statistically significant p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EAF were present in 39 cases (5.9%). A significant difference in the presence of EAF was present in patients with negative pressure therapy of the wound length ≥ 11.2 days (46.9 vs. 1.3%; relative risk [RR]: 3.67; 95% confidence interval [95% IC]: 2.4-6.68; p = 0.017) and when ≥ 2.6 VAC<sup>®</sup> device changes were performed (34.6 vs. 0.5%; RR: 6.92; 95% IC: 1.1-4.3; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At our institution, the practice of >3 VAC<sup>®</sup> device changes and length of therapy > 11 days should be carefully considered leading to reduce the risk of EAF formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93936,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia y cirujanos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enteroatmospheric fistulas in open abdomen in trauma associated with abdominal reintervention and VAC therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Jesús E Rodríguez-Silverio,&nbsp;Luis M García-Núñez,&nbsp;Edgar F Hernández-García,&nbsp;Héctor F Noyola-Villalobos,&nbsp;Luis F Moreno-Delagado\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/CIRU.22000419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Open abdomen is an alternative for the management of trauma patient, and negative pressure therapy of the wound using VAC<sup>®</sup> device is a genuine sort of treatment. Although the device poses technical advantages, risks are present and a critical complication is the enteroatmospheric fistula formation (EAF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analize the role of negative pressure therapy length and VAC<sup>®</sup> device number of changes on the EAF formation in trauma patients udergoing open abdomen.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cut-off points were calculated using receiver operational characteristics curve. Values were compared with Student's t or Mann-Withney U tests, considering statistically significant p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EAF were present in 39 cases (5.9%). A significant difference in the presence of EAF was present in patients with negative pressure therapy of the wound length ≥ 11.2 days (46.9 vs. 1.3%; relative risk [RR]: 3.67; 95% confidence interval [95% IC]: 2.4-6.68; p = 0.017) and when ≥ 2.6 VAC<sup>®</sup> device changes were performed (34.6 vs. 0.5%; RR: 6.92; 95% IC: 1.1-4.3; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At our institution, the practice of >3 VAC<sup>®</sup> device changes and length of therapy > 11 days should be carefully considered leading to reduce the risk of EAF formation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cirugia y cirujanos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cirugia y cirujanos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.22000419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia y cirujanos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.22000419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:开放式腹部是创伤患者的一种替代治疗方法,使用VAC®设备对伤口进行负压治疗是一种真正的治疗方法。尽管该装置具有技术优势,但存在风险,一个关键的并发症是肠大气瘘的形成。目的:分析负压治疗时间和VAC®装置数量的变化对腹部开放的创伤患者肠大气瘘形成的影响。方法:使用受试者操作特性曲线计算截止点。将数值与Student的t或Mann-Withney U检验进行比较,考虑统计学显著性p<0.05。结果:39例(5.9%)出现EAF。伤口长度≥11.2天的负压治疗患者出现EAF的显著差异(46.9对1.3%;相对风险[RR]:3.67;95%置信区间[95%IC]:2.4-6.68;p=0.017),以及当进行≥2.6 VAC®装置更换时(34.6 vs.0.5%;RR:6.92;95%IC:1.1-4.3;p<0.001)。结论:在我们的机构,应仔细考虑>3 VAC®装置更换和治疗时间>11天的做法,以降低EAF形成的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enteroatmospheric fistulas in open abdomen in trauma associated with abdominal reintervention and VAC therapy.

Background: Open abdomen is an alternative for the management of trauma patient, and negative pressure therapy of the wound using VAC® device is a genuine sort of treatment. Although the device poses technical advantages, risks are present and a critical complication is the enteroatmospheric fistula formation (EAF).

Objective: To analize the role of negative pressure therapy length and VAC® device number of changes on the EAF formation in trauma patients udergoing open abdomen.

Method: Cut-off points were calculated using receiver operational characteristics curve. Values were compared with Student's t or Mann-Withney U tests, considering statistically significant p < 0.05.

Results: EAF were present in 39 cases (5.9%). A significant difference in the presence of EAF was present in patients with negative pressure therapy of the wound length ≥ 11.2 days (46.9 vs. 1.3%; relative risk [RR]: 3.67; 95% confidence interval [95% IC]: 2.4-6.68; p = 0.017) and when ≥ 2.6 VAC® device changes were performed (34.6 vs. 0.5%; RR: 6.92; 95% IC: 1.1-4.3; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: At our institution, the practice of >3 VAC® device changes and length of therapy > 11 days should be carefully considered leading to reduce the risk of EAF formation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信