跨学科规划改善了放射科医生获得的经皮肾取石术的途径。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Canadian Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2023-10-01
Christopher J Staniorski, Mitchell B Alameddine, Shyam Patnaik, Michelle J Semins
{"title":"跨学科规划改善了放射科医生获得的经皮肾取石术的途径。","authors":"Christopher J Staniorski,&nbsp;Mitchell B Alameddine,&nbsp;Shyam Patnaik,&nbsp;Michelle J Semins","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proper antegrade access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is essential for success but can be challenging. Previous work evaluating access obtained by interventional radiology (IR), largely in the emergent setting, has shown high rates of additional access at the time of PCNL. We hypothesize that efforts to improve pre-procedural communication between urology and IR can impact the utility of the access for subsequent PCNL.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing PCNL at a single hospital from January 2011 to December 2022. Adult patients undergoing PCNL with established preoperative access were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 141 cases were identified with preoperative access. A total of 111 patients had evidence of planning with IR prior to antegrade access. There were high rates of anatomic abnormality (50%) and staghorn calculus (53%). Patients with planned access had higher body mass index (BMI). While preoperative access was initially utilized in 97% of cases, 6% required additional access to be obtained intraoperatively; this included a low rate of new access in those that were previously discussed with IR (4% vs. 17%, p = 0.02). Overall stone free rates (91%), rates of second stage procedures (55%) and complications (14%) were similar between planned and unplanned groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this retrospective study of complex patients with large stone burden presenting for PCNL with preoperative antegrade access obtained by IR, the rate of new access was far lower than prior reports. This was likely influenced by urologist involvement in planning access.</p>","PeriodicalId":56323,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Urology","volume":"30 5","pages":"11692-11697"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interdisciplinary planning improves radiologist obtained access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher J Staniorski,&nbsp;Mitchell B Alameddine,&nbsp;Shyam Patnaik,&nbsp;Michelle J Semins\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proper antegrade access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is essential for success but can be challenging. Previous work evaluating access obtained by interventional radiology (IR), largely in the emergent setting, has shown high rates of additional access at the time of PCNL. We hypothesize that efforts to improve pre-procedural communication between urology and IR can impact the utility of the access for subsequent PCNL.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing PCNL at a single hospital from January 2011 to December 2022. Adult patients undergoing PCNL with established preoperative access were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 141 cases were identified with preoperative access. A total of 111 patients had evidence of planning with IR prior to antegrade access. There were high rates of anatomic abnormality (50%) and staghorn calculus (53%). Patients with planned access had higher body mass index (BMI). While preoperative access was initially utilized in 97% of cases, 6% required additional access to be obtained intraoperatively; this included a low rate of new access in those that were previously discussed with IR (4% vs. 17%, p = 0.02). Overall stone free rates (91%), rates of second stage procedures (55%) and complications (14%) were similar between planned and unplanned groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this retrospective study of complex patients with large stone burden presenting for PCNL with preoperative antegrade access obtained by IR, the rate of new access was far lower than prior reports. This was likely influenced by urologist involvement in planning access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"11692-11697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:正确的顺行经皮肾取石术(PCNL)对成功至关重要,但可能具有挑战性。先前评估介入放射学(IR)获得的通路的工作,主要是在紧急情况下,显示PCNL时的额外通路率很高。我们假设,改善泌尿外科和IR术前沟通的努力可能会影响后续PCNL的使用。材料和方法:我们对2011年1月至2022年12月在一家医院接受PCNL的患者进行了回顾性审查。纳入了接受PCNL的成年患者,并确定了术前通路。结果:共有141例患者通过术前入路确诊。共有111名患者在顺行入路前有IR计划的证据。解剖异常发生率高(50%),鹿角形结石发生率高达53%。有计划进入的患者具有较高的体重指数(BMI)。术前通路最初用于97%的病例,6%的病例需要在术中获得额外通路;这包括之前与IR讨论过的患者的新入路率较低(4%对17%,p=0.02)。计划组和计划外组的总结石清除率(91%)、第二阶段手术率(55%)和并发症(14%)相似。结论:在这项回顾性研究中,对术前通过IR获得顺行入路并伴有PCNL的大结石负担的复杂患者,新入路率远低于先前的报道。这可能是受泌尿科医生参与计划访问的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interdisciplinary planning improves radiologist obtained access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Introduction: Proper antegrade access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is essential for success but can be challenging. Previous work evaluating access obtained by interventional radiology (IR), largely in the emergent setting, has shown high rates of additional access at the time of PCNL. We hypothesize that efforts to improve pre-procedural communication between urology and IR can impact the utility of the access for subsequent PCNL.

Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing PCNL at a single hospital from January 2011 to December 2022. Adult patients undergoing PCNL with established preoperative access were included.

Results: A total of 141 cases were identified with preoperative access. A total of 111 patients had evidence of planning with IR prior to antegrade access. There were high rates of anatomic abnormality (50%) and staghorn calculus (53%). Patients with planned access had higher body mass index (BMI). While preoperative access was initially utilized in 97% of cases, 6% required additional access to be obtained intraoperatively; this included a low rate of new access in those that were previously discussed with IR (4% vs. 17%, p = 0.02). Overall stone free rates (91%), rates of second stage procedures (55%) and complications (14%) were similar between planned and unplanned groups.

Conclusion: In this retrospective study of complex patients with large stone burden presenting for PCNL with preoperative antegrade access obtained by IR, the rate of new access was far lower than prior reports. This was likely influenced by urologist involvement in planning access.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Urology
Canadian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The CJU publishes articles of interest to the field of urology and related specialties who treat urologic diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信