Hojin Jang;Syed Suleman Abbas Zaidi;Xavier Boix;Neeraj Prasad;Sharon Gilad-Gutnick;Shlomit Ben-Ami;Pawan Sinha
{"title":"跨类别变换的鲁棒性:鲁棒性是由不变的神经表示驱动的吗?","authors":"Hojin Jang;Syed Suleman Abbas Zaidi;Xavier Boix;Neeraj Prasad;Sharon Gilad-Gutnick;Shlomit Ben-Ami;Pawan Sinha","doi":"10.1162/neco_a_01621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) have demonstrated impressive robustness to recognize objects under transformations (e.g., blur or noise) when these transformations are included in the training set. A hypothesis to explain such robustness is that DCNNs develop invariant neural representations that remain unaltered when the image is transformed. However, to what extent this hypothesis holds true is an outstanding question, as robustness to transformations could be achieved with properties different from invariance; for example, parts of the network could be specialized to recognize either transformed or nontransformed images. This article investigates the conditions under which invariant neural representations emerge by leveraging that they facilitate robustness to transformations beyond the training distribution. Concretely, we analyze a training paradigm in which only some object categories are seen transformed during training and evaluate whether the DCNN is robust to transformations across categories not seen transformed. Our results with state-of-the-art DCNNs indicate that invariant neural representations do not always drive robustness to transformations, as networks show robustness for categories seen transformed during training even in the absence of invariant neural representations. Invariance emerges only as the number of transformed categories in the training set is increased. This phenomenon is much more prominent with local transformations such as blurring and high-pass filtering than geometric transformations such as rotation and thinning, which entail changes in the spatial arrangement of the object. Our results contribute to a better understanding of invariant neural representations in deep learning and the conditions under which it spontaneously emerges.","PeriodicalId":54731,"journal":{"name":"Neural Computation","volume":"35 12","pages":"1910-1937"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robustness to Transformations Across Categories: Is Robustness Driven by Invariant Neural Representations?\",\"authors\":\"Hojin Jang;Syed Suleman Abbas Zaidi;Xavier Boix;Neeraj Prasad;Sharon Gilad-Gutnick;Shlomit Ben-Ami;Pawan Sinha\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/neco_a_01621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) have demonstrated impressive robustness to recognize objects under transformations (e.g., blur or noise) when these transformations are included in the training set. A hypothesis to explain such robustness is that DCNNs develop invariant neural representations that remain unaltered when the image is transformed. However, to what extent this hypothesis holds true is an outstanding question, as robustness to transformations could be achieved with properties different from invariance; for example, parts of the network could be specialized to recognize either transformed or nontransformed images. This article investigates the conditions under which invariant neural representations emerge by leveraging that they facilitate robustness to transformations beyond the training distribution. Concretely, we analyze a training paradigm in which only some object categories are seen transformed during training and evaluate whether the DCNN is robust to transformations across categories not seen transformed. Our results with state-of-the-art DCNNs indicate that invariant neural representations do not always drive robustness to transformations, as networks show robustness for categories seen transformed during training even in the absence of invariant neural representations. Invariance emerges only as the number of transformed categories in the training set is increased. This phenomenon is much more prominent with local transformations such as blurring and high-pass filtering than geometric transformations such as rotation and thinning, which entail changes in the spatial arrangement of the object. Our results contribute to a better understanding of invariant neural representations in deep learning and the conditions under which it spontaneously emerges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neural Computation\",\"volume\":\"35 12\",\"pages\":\"1910-1937\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neural Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10355117/\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Computation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10355117/","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Robustness to Transformations Across Categories: Is Robustness Driven by Invariant Neural Representations?
Deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) have demonstrated impressive robustness to recognize objects under transformations (e.g., blur or noise) when these transformations are included in the training set. A hypothesis to explain such robustness is that DCNNs develop invariant neural representations that remain unaltered when the image is transformed. However, to what extent this hypothesis holds true is an outstanding question, as robustness to transformations could be achieved with properties different from invariance; for example, parts of the network could be specialized to recognize either transformed or nontransformed images. This article investigates the conditions under which invariant neural representations emerge by leveraging that they facilitate robustness to transformations beyond the training distribution. Concretely, we analyze a training paradigm in which only some object categories are seen transformed during training and evaluate whether the DCNN is robust to transformations across categories not seen transformed. Our results with state-of-the-art DCNNs indicate that invariant neural representations do not always drive robustness to transformations, as networks show robustness for categories seen transformed during training even in the absence of invariant neural representations. Invariance emerges only as the number of transformed categories in the training set is increased. This phenomenon is much more prominent with local transformations such as blurring and high-pass filtering than geometric transformations such as rotation and thinning, which entail changes in the spatial arrangement of the object. Our results contribute to a better understanding of invariant neural representations in deep learning and the conditions under which it spontaneously emerges.
期刊介绍:
Neural Computation is uniquely positioned at the crossroads between neuroscience and TMCS and welcomes the submission of original papers from all areas of TMCS, including: Advanced experimental design; Analysis of chemical sensor data; Connectomic reconstructions; Analysis of multielectrode and optical recordings; Genetic data for cell identity; Analysis of behavioral data; Multiscale models; Analysis of molecular mechanisms; Neuroinformatics; Analysis of brain imaging data; Neuromorphic engineering; Principles of neural coding, computation, circuit dynamics, and plasticity; Theories of brain function.