应用有序回归法通过行为问题提取社会功能障碍水平。

IF 3.1 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
AIMS Public Health Pub Date : 2023-07-14 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3934/publichealth.2023041
Alka Sabharwal, Babita Goyal, Lalit Mohan Joshi
{"title":"应用有序回归法通过行为问题提取社会功能障碍水平。","authors":"Alka Sabharwal,&nbsp;Babita Goyal,&nbsp;Lalit Mohan Joshi","doi":"10.3934/publichealth.2023041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychological problems are complex in nature and accurate identification of these problems is important. For the identification of psychological problems, one of the preliminary tools is the use of interviews/questionnaires. Questionnaires are preferred over interviews if the group under study is large. A strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) is one of the most widely used and powerful questionnaires to identify behavioral problems and distresses being faced by the respondents, affecting their day-to-day lives (responsible for social dysfunction). This study was held on college/university students in India, with the objective of examining if the extent of social dysfunction as measured by an impact score can be extracted from behavioral problems which are the components of the difficulty score of SDQ. Two surveys were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic period, between the months of May-June 2020 and October 2020-February 2021 for the study. Only those responses were considered who felt distressed (\"yes\" to item 26 of SDQ). The numbers of such responses were 772/1020 and 584/743, respectively, in the two surveys. Distress levels were treated as ordered variables and three categories of distress level, viz., \"Normal\", \"Borderline\", and \"Abnormal\" were estimated through behavioral problems using ordinal regression (OR) methods with a negative log-log link function. The fitting of OR models was tested and accepted using Cox and Snell, Nagelkerke, and McFadden test. Hyperactivity-inattention and emotional symptoms were significant contributors to estimating levels of distress among respondents in survey 1 (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In addition to these components, in survey 2, peer problems were also significant. OR models were good at estimating the extreme categories; however, the \"Borderline\" category was not estimated well. One of the reasons was the use of qualitative and complex data with the least wide \"Borderline\" category, both for the \"Difficulty\" and the \"Impact\" scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":45684,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Public Health","volume":"10 3","pages":"577-592"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10567980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An application of ordinal regression to extract social dysfunction levels through behavioral problems.\",\"authors\":\"Alka Sabharwal,&nbsp;Babita Goyal,&nbsp;Lalit Mohan Joshi\",\"doi\":\"10.3934/publichealth.2023041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Psychological problems are complex in nature and accurate identification of these problems is important. For the identification of psychological problems, one of the preliminary tools is the use of interviews/questionnaires. Questionnaires are preferred over interviews if the group under study is large. A strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) is one of the most widely used and powerful questionnaires to identify behavioral problems and distresses being faced by the respondents, affecting their day-to-day lives (responsible for social dysfunction). This study was held on college/university students in India, with the objective of examining if the extent of social dysfunction as measured by an impact score can be extracted from behavioral problems which are the components of the difficulty score of SDQ. Two surveys were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic period, between the months of May-June 2020 and October 2020-February 2021 for the study. Only those responses were considered who felt distressed (\\\"yes\\\" to item 26 of SDQ). The numbers of such responses were 772/1020 and 584/743, respectively, in the two surveys. Distress levels were treated as ordered variables and three categories of distress level, viz., \\\"Normal\\\", \\\"Borderline\\\", and \\\"Abnormal\\\" were estimated through behavioral problems using ordinal regression (OR) methods with a negative log-log link function. The fitting of OR models was tested and accepted using Cox and Snell, Nagelkerke, and McFadden test. Hyperactivity-inattention and emotional symptoms were significant contributors to estimating levels of distress among respondents in survey 1 (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In addition to these components, in survey 2, peer problems were also significant. OR models were good at estimating the extreme categories; however, the \\\"Borderline\\\" category was not estimated well. One of the reasons was the use of qualitative and complex data with the least wide \\\"Borderline\\\" category, both for the \\\"Difficulty\\\" and the \\\"Impact\\\" scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIMS Public Health\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"577-592\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10567980/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIMS Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2023041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2023041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心理问题本质上是复杂的,准确识别这些问题很重要。为了识别心理问题,初步工具之一是使用访谈/问卷调查。如果所研究的群体很大,那么问卷调查比访谈更可取。优势和困难问卷(SDQ)是使用最广泛、最有力的问卷之一,用于确定受访者面临的行为问题和痛苦,影响他们的日常生活(导致社会功能障碍)。这项研究是针对印度的大学生进行的,目的是检验通过影响得分衡量的社会功能障碍程度是否可以从行为问题中提取出来,而行为问题是SDQ难度得分的组成部分。本研究在新冠肺炎大流行期间,即2020年5月至2020年10月至2021年2月期间进行了两项调查。只有那些感到痛苦的答复才被考虑(SDQ第26项为“是”)。在这两项调查中,这类回复的数量分别为772/1020和584/743。遇险水平被视为有序变量,三类遇险水平,即“正常”、“边界线”和“异常”,通过行为问题使用具有负对数-对数链接函数的有序回归(OR)方法进行估计。OR模型的拟合使用Cox和Snell、Nagelkerke和McFadden检验进行了测试和验收。在调查1中,过度活动、注意力不集中和情绪症状是估计受访者痛苦程度的重要因素(p<0.05)。除了这些因素外,在调查2中,同伴问题也很重要。OR模型善于估计极端类别;然而,对“边界线”类别的估计并不好。其中一个原因是在“难度”和“影响”得分方面,使用了“边界线”类别最不广泛的定性和复杂数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An application of ordinal regression to extract social dysfunction levels through behavioral problems.

An application of ordinal regression to extract social dysfunction levels through behavioral problems.

Psychological problems are complex in nature and accurate identification of these problems is important. For the identification of psychological problems, one of the preliminary tools is the use of interviews/questionnaires. Questionnaires are preferred over interviews if the group under study is large. A strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) is one of the most widely used and powerful questionnaires to identify behavioral problems and distresses being faced by the respondents, affecting their day-to-day lives (responsible for social dysfunction). This study was held on college/university students in India, with the objective of examining if the extent of social dysfunction as measured by an impact score can be extracted from behavioral problems which are the components of the difficulty score of SDQ. Two surveys were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic period, between the months of May-June 2020 and October 2020-February 2021 for the study. Only those responses were considered who felt distressed ("yes" to item 26 of SDQ). The numbers of such responses were 772/1020 and 584/743, respectively, in the two surveys. Distress levels were treated as ordered variables and three categories of distress level, viz., "Normal", "Borderline", and "Abnormal" were estimated through behavioral problems using ordinal regression (OR) methods with a negative log-log link function. The fitting of OR models was tested and accepted using Cox and Snell, Nagelkerke, and McFadden test. Hyperactivity-inattention and emotional symptoms were significant contributors to estimating levels of distress among respondents in survey 1 (p < 0.05). In addition to these components, in survey 2, peer problems were also significant. OR models were good at estimating the extreme categories; however, the "Borderline" category was not estimated well. One of the reasons was the use of qualitative and complex data with the least wide "Borderline" category, both for the "Difficulty" and the "Impact" scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AIMS Public Health
AIMS Public Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信