75岁以上患者的器械腰椎融合术:值得吗-老年患者和年轻患者生活质量改善的比较研究。

Q1 Medicine
Félix Tomé-Bermejo, Fernando Moreno-Mateo, Ángel Piñera-Parrilla, Javier Cervera-Irimia, Charles Louis Mengis-Palleck, Jesús Gallego-Bustos, Francisco Garzón-Márquez, María G Rodríguez-Arguisjuela, Sylvia Sanz-Aguilera, Kelman Luis de la Rosa-Zabala, Carmen Avilés-Morente, Beatriz Oliveros-Escudero, Alexa Anaís Núñez-Torrealba, Luis Alvarez-Galovich
{"title":"75岁以上患者的器械腰椎融合术:值得吗-老年患者和年轻患者生活质量改善的比较研究。","authors":"Félix Tomé-Bermejo,&nbsp;Fernando Moreno-Mateo,&nbsp;Ángel Piñera-Parrilla,&nbsp;Javier Cervera-Irimia,&nbsp;Charles Louis Mengis-Palleck,&nbsp;Jesús Gallego-Bustos,&nbsp;Francisco Garzón-Márquez,&nbsp;María G Rodríguez-Arguisjuela,&nbsp;Sylvia Sanz-Aguilera,&nbsp;Kelman Luis de la Rosa-Zabala,&nbsp;Carmen Avilés-Morente,&nbsp;Beatriz Oliveros-Escudero,&nbsp;Alexa Anaís Núñez-Torrealba,&nbsp;Luis Alvarez-Galovich","doi":"10.21037/jss-22-115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in the elderly is controversial. Elderly patients have an increased risk for medical and surgical complications commensurate with their comorbidities, and concerns over complications have led to frequent cases of insufficient decompression to avoid the need for instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome between older and younger patients undergoing lumbar instrumented arthrodesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective, comparative study of prospectively collected outcomes. One hundred and fifty-four patients underwent 1- or 2-level posterolateral lumbar fusion. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1: 87 patients ≤65 years of age who underwent decompression and posterolateral instrumented fusion; Group 2: 67 patients ≥75 years of age who underwent the same procedures with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) pedicle-screw augmentation. Mean follow-up 27.47 months (range, 76-24 months).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 49.1 years old (range, 24-65) for the younger group and 77.8 (range, 75-86) in the elderly group. Patients ≥75 years of age showed higher preoperative comorbidity (American Society of Anesthesiology, ASA: 1.7 <i>vs</i>. 2.4), and ≥2 systemic diseases with greater frequency (12.5% <i>vs</i>. 44.7%). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of postoperative complications, fusion, or revision rate. During follow-up, adjacent disc disease and adjacent fracture occurred significantly more in Group 2 (P<0.05). At the end of follow-up, there were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the clinical and health-related quality of life scores or satisfaction with treatment received.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Osteoporosis represents a major consideration before performing spine surgery. Despite an obvious increased risk of complications in elderly patients, PMMA-augmented fenestrated pedicle screw instrumentation in spine fusion represents a safe and effective surgical treatment option to elderly patients with poor bone quality. Age itself should not be considered a contraindication in otherwise appropriately selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"9 3","pages":"247-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/e9/jss-09-03-247.PMC10570654.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instrumented lumbar fusion in patients over 75 years of age: is it worthwhile?-a comparative study of the improvement in quality of life between elderly and young patients.\",\"authors\":\"Félix Tomé-Bermejo,&nbsp;Fernando Moreno-Mateo,&nbsp;Ángel Piñera-Parrilla,&nbsp;Javier Cervera-Irimia,&nbsp;Charles Louis Mengis-Palleck,&nbsp;Jesús Gallego-Bustos,&nbsp;Francisco Garzón-Márquez,&nbsp;María G Rodríguez-Arguisjuela,&nbsp;Sylvia Sanz-Aguilera,&nbsp;Kelman Luis de la Rosa-Zabala,&nbsp;Carmen Avilés-Morente,&nbsp;Beatriz Oliveros-Escudero,&nbsp;Alexa Anaís Núñez-Torrealba,&nbsp;Luis Alvarez-Galovich\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jss-22-115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in the elderly is controversial. Elderly patients have an increased risk for medical and surgical complications commensurate with their comorbidities, and concerns over complications have led to frequent cases of insufficient decompression to avoid the need for instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome between older and younger patients undergoing lumbar instrumented arthrodesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective, comparative study of prospectively collected outcomes. One hundred and fifty-four patients underwent 1- or 2-level posterolateral lumbar fusion. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1: 87 patients ≤65 years of age who underwent decompression and posterolateral instrumented fusion; Group 2: 67 patients ≥75 years of age who underwent the same procedures with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) pedicle-screw augmentation. Mean follow-up 27.47 months (range, 76-24 months).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 49.1 years old (range, 24-65) for the younger group and 77.8 (range, 75-86) in the elderly group. Patients ≥75 years of age showed higher preoperative comorbidity (American Society of Anesthesiology, ASA: 1.7 <i>vs</i>. 2.4), and ≥2 systemic diseases with greater frequency (12.5% <i>vs</i>. 44.7%). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of postoperative complications, fusion, or revision rate. During follow-up, adjacent disc disease and adjacent fracture occurred significantly more in Group 2 (P<0.05). At the end of follow-up, there were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the clinical and health-related quality of life scores or satisfaction with treatment received.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Osteoporosis represents a major consideration before performing spine surgery. Despite an obvious increased risk of complications in elderly patients, PMMA-augmented fenestrated pedicle screw instrumentation in spine fusion represents a safe and effective surgical treatment option to elderly patients with poor bone quality. Age itself should not be considered a contraindication in otherwise appropriately selected patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of spine surgery\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"247-258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/e9/jss-09-03-247.PMC10570654.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of spine surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-22-115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-22-115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年人退行性腰椎疾病的外科治疗存在争议。老年患者出现与其合并症相称的医疗和手术并发症的风险增加,对并发症的担忧导致经常出现减压不足以避免器械需要的情况。本研究的目的是评估接受腰椎融合术的老年和年轻患者的临床结果。方法:这是一项前瞻性收集结果的回顾性比较研究。154名患者接受了1级或2级后外侧腰椎融合术。患者被分为两组。第1组:87名年龄≤65岁的患者接受减压和后外侧器械融合;第2组:67名年龄≥75岁的患者接受了相同的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)椎弓根螺钉增强术。平均随访27.47个月(范围76-24个月)。结果:年轻组的平均年龄为49.1岁(范围24-65岁),老年组为77.8岁(范围75-86岁)。年龄≥75岁的患者术前合并症较高(美国麻醉学学会,ASA:1.7 vs.2.4),且≥2种系统性疾病的发生率较高(12.5%vs.44.7%)。两组在术后并发症、融合或翻修率方面没有发现显著差异。在随访期间,相邻椎间盘疾病和相邻骨折在第2组中发生率显著增加(结论:骨质疏松是进行脊柱手术前的主要考虑因素。尽管老年患者并发症的风险明显增加,但对于骨质量较差的老年患者来说,PMMA增强开窗椎弓根螺钉内固定器是一种安全有效的手术治疗选择其他适当选择的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Instrumented lumbar fusion in patients over 75 years of age: is it worthwhile?-a comparative study of the improvement in quality of life between elderly and young patients.

Instrumented lumbar fusion in patients over 75 years of age: is it worthwhile?-a comparative study of the improvement in quality of life between elderly and young patients.

Instrumented lumbar fusion in patients over 75 years of age: is it worthwhile?-a comparative study of the improvement in quality of life between elderly and young patients.

Background: Surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in the elderly is controversial. Elderly patients have an increased risk for medical and surgical complications commensurate with their comorbidities, and concerns over complications have led to frequent cases of insufficient decompression to avoid the need for instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome between older and younger patients undergoing lumbar instrumented arthrodesis.

Methods: This is a retrospective, comparative study of prospectively collected outcomes. One hundred and fifty-four patients underwent 1- or 2-level posterolateral lumbar fusion. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1: 87 patients ≤65 years of age who underwent decompression and posterolateral instrumented fusion; Group 2: 67 patients ≥75 years of age who underwent the same procedures with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) pedicle-screw augmentation. Mean follow-up 27.47 months (range, 76-24 months).

Results: Mean age was 49.1 years old (range, 24-65) for the younger group and 77.8 (range, 75-86) in the elderly group. Patients ≥75 years of age showed higher preoperative comorbidity (American Society of Anesthesiology, ASA: 1.7 vs. 2.4), and ≥2 systemic diseases with greater frequency (12.5% vs. 44.7%). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of postoperative complications, fusion, or revision rate. During follow-up, adjacent disc disease and adjacent fracture occurred significantly more in Group 2 (P<0.05). At the end of follow-up, there were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the clinical and health-related quality of life scores or satisfaction with treatment received.

Conclusions: Osteoporosis represents a major consideration before performing spine surgery. Despite an obvious increased risk of complications in elderly patients, PMMA-augmented fenestrated pedicle screw instrumentation in spine fusion represents a safe and effective surgical treatment option to elderly patients with poor bone quality. Age itself should not be considered a contraindication in otherwise appropriately selected patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信