Norah Ibrahim Alromaih, Hani Nouran Alharbi, Nouf Abdulaziz Altwaijri, Saad Radi Surur
{"title":"C1气枪弹丸:病例报告和文献综述。","authors":"Norah Ibrahim Alromaih, Hani Nouran Alharbi, Nouf Abdulaziz Altwaijri, Saad Radi Surur","doi":"10.21037/jss-23-42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Air-gun pellet injuries commonly occur in children between the age of 1-18 years old. These injuries could be fetal because it linked to injury to vital organs such as brain, heart, and eyes. In the literature, there are few studies that reported spine injury by air-gun pellet. Our case is a C1 foreign body in a pediatric patient without any neurological deficits after an air-gun injury.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>A 6-year-old boy, known case of Hirschsprung disease presented to the emergency department after an air-gun injury in June 2021. On examination, the patient was hemodynamically stable, and asymptomatic. Neurological exam was intact with power 5/5 in C5-S1 and sensation 2/2 in C5-S1. Computed tomography (CT) of the cervical spine showed a foreign body at C1. After discussing the treatment options with his parents, we treat the patient conservatively by close follow-up and analgesia only. After 1 week, the patient presented to the clinic and the patient was still asymptomatic. A cervical X-ray at that time done and showed no changes in the position from the initial CT. Weekly follow-up was difficult for the family to adhere to due to their socioeconomic status. Therefore, the patient was followed up over the phone call through telemedicine at 6 months and 1 year after the injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The treatment of these types on injuries is highly controversial. The treatment options could be surgical or non-surgical (conservative) such as antibiotic use. Also, there is always a debate about the choice of the treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"9 3","pages":"375-379"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c8/68/jss-09-03-375.PMC10570641.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Air-gun pellet at C1: a case report and literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Norah Ibrahim Alromaih, Hani Nouran Alharbi, Nouf Abdulaziz Altwaijri, Saad Radi Surur\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jss-23-42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Air-gun pellet injuries commonly occur in children between the age of 1-18 years old. These injuries could be fetal because it linked to injury to vital organs such as brain, heart, and eyes. In the literature, there are few studies that reported spine injury by air-gun pellet. Our case is a C1 foreign body in a pediatric patient without any neurological deficits after an air-gun injury.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>A 6-year-old boy, known case of Hirschsprung disease presented to the emergency department after an air-gun injury in June 2021. On examination, the patient was hemodynamically stable, and asymptomatic. Neurological exam was intact with power 5/5 in C5-S1 and sensation 2/2 in C5-S1. Computed tomography (CT) of the cervical spine showed a foreign body at C1. After discussing the treatment options with his parents, we treat the patient conservatively by close follow-up and analgesia only. After 1 week, the patient presented to the clinic and the patient was still asymptomatic. A cervical X-ray at that time done and showed no changes in the position from the initial CT. Weekly follow-up was difficult for the family to adhere to due to their socioeconomic status. Therefore, the patient was followed up over the phone call through telemedicine at 6 months and 1 year after the injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The treatment of these types on injuries is highly controversial. The treatment options could be surgical or non-surgical (conservative) such as antibiotic use. Also, there is always a debate about the choice of the treatment options.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of spine surgery\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"375-379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c8/68/jss-09-03-375.PMC10570641.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of spine surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-23-42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-23-42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Air-gun pellet at C1: a case report and literature review.
Background: Air-gun pellet injuries commonly occur in children between the age of 1-18 years old. These injuries could be fetal because it linked to injury to vital organs such as brain, heart, and eyes. In the literature, there are few studies that reported spine injury by air-gun pellet. Our case is a C1 foreign body in a pediatric patient without any neurological deficits after an air-gun injury.
Case description: A 6-year-old boy, known case of Hirschsprung disease presented to the emergency department after an air-gun injury in June 2021. On examination, the patient was hemodynamically stable, and asymptomatic. Neurological exam was intact with power 5/5 in C5-S1 and sensation 2/2 in C5-S1. Computed tomography (CT) of the cervical spine showed a foreign body at C1. After discussing the treatment options with his parents, we treat the patient conservatively by close follow-up and analgesia only. After 1 week, the patient presented to the clinic and the patient was still asymptomatic. A cervical X-ray at that time done and showed no changes in the position from the initial CT. Weekly follow-up was difficult for the family to adhere to due to their socioeconomic status. Therefore, the patient was followed up over the phone call through telemedicine at 6 months and 1 year after the injury.
Conclusions: The treatment of these types on injuries is highly controversial. The treatment options could be surgical or non-surgical (conservative) such as antibiotic use. Also, there is always a debate about the choice of the treatment options.