James‘Place模型对经历自杀危机的男性的可接受性和保真度的混合方法评估。

IF 2.4 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2023-10-11 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21642850.2023.2265142
Claire Anne Hanlon, Jennifer Chopra, Jane Boland, David McIlroy, Helen Poole, Pooja Saini
{"title":"James‘Place模型对经历自杀危机的男性的可接受性和保真度的混合方法评估。","authors":"Claire Anne Hanlon,&nbsp;Jennifer Chopra,&nbsp;Jane Boland,&nbsp;David McIlroy,&nbsp;Helen Poole,&nbsp;Pooja Saini","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2265142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research supports development of informal, community-based suicide prevention interventions that can be tailored to suit men's unmet needs. The James' Place model (JPM) is a community-based, clinical suicide prevention intervention for men experiencing suicidal crisis. Evidence supports the efficacy of the JPM and there are plans to expand to additional sites across the UK. This study evaluates therapists perceived acceptability of the JPM, and if fidelity to the planned delivery of the model is maintained within therapeutic practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A mixed-methods design was used. Descriptive analyses of 30 completed intervention cases were examined to review fidelity of the model against the intervention delivery plan. Eight therapists took part in semi-structured interviews between November 2021 and March 2022 exploring the perceived acceptability, and barriers and facilitators to delivering the JPM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptive analyses of James' Place audit notes revealed high levels of adherence to the JPM amongst therapists, but highlighted components of the model needed to be tailored according to individual men's needs. Thematic analysis led to the development of five themes. The first theme, <i>therapeutic environment</i> highlighted importance of the therapy setting. The second theme identified was <i>specialised suicide prevention training</i> in the JPM that facilitated therapists understanding and expertise. The third theme identified was <i>therapy engagement</i> which discusses men's engagement in therapy. The fourth theme, <i>person-centred care</i> related to adaptation of delivery of JPM components. The final theme, <i>adapting the JPM to individual needs</i> describes tailoring of the JPM by therapists to be responsive to individual men's needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings evidence therapist's acceptability and their moderate adherence to the JPM. Flexibility in delivery of the JPM enables adaptation of the model and co-production of therapy to meet men's needs. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"2265142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e6/ed/RHPB_11_2265142.PMC10572045.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mixed-methods evaluation of the acceptability and fidelity of the James' Place model for men experiencing suicidal crisis.\",\"authors\":\"Claire Anne Hanlon,&nbsp;Jennifer Chopra,&nbsp;Jane Boland,&nbsp;David McIlroy,&nbsp;Helen Poole,&nbsp;Pooja Saini\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21642850.2023.2265142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research supports development of informal, community-based suicide prevention interventions that can be tailored to suit men's unmet needs. The James' Place model (JPM) is a community-based, clinical suicide prevention intervention for men experiencing suicidal crisis. Evidence supports the efficacy of the JPM and there are plans to expand to additional sites across the UK. This study evaluates therapists perceived acceptability of the JPM, and if fidelity to the planned delivery of the model is maintained within therapeutic practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A mixed-methods design was used. Descriptive analyses of 30 completed intervention cases were examined to review fidelity of the model against the intervention delivery plan. Eight therapists took part in semi-structured interviews between November 2021 and March 2022 exploring the perceived acceptability, and barriers and facilitators to delivering the JPM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptive analyses of James' Place audit notes revealed high levels of adherence to the JPM amongst therapists, but highlighted components of the model needed to be tailored according to individual men's needs. Thematic analysis led to the development of five themes. The first theme, <i>therapeutic environment</i> highlighted importance of the therapy setting. The second theme identified was <i>specialised suicide prevention training</i> in the JPM that facilitated therapists understanding and expertise. The third theme identified was <i>therapy engagement</i> which discusses men's engagement in therapy. The fourth theme, <i>person-centred care</i> related to adaptation of delivery of JPM components. The final theme, <i>adapting the JPM to individual needs</i> describes tailoring of the JPM by therapists to be responsive to individual men's needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings evidence therapist's acceptability and their moderate adherence to the JPM. Flexibility in delivery of the JPM enables adaptation of the model and co-production of therapy to meet men's needs. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"2265142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e6/ed/RHPB_11_2265142.PMC10572045.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2023.2265142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2023.2265142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究支持制定非正式的、基于社区的自杀预防干预措施,这些干预措施可以针对男性未满足的需求进行量身定制。James‘Place模型(JPM)是一种基于社区的临床自杀预防干预措施,适用于经历自杀危机的男性。有证据支持JPM的有效性,并计划在英国各地扩展到其他地点。这项研究评估了治疗师对JPM的可接受性,以及在治疗实践中是否保持了对模型计划交付的忠诚度。方法:采用混合方法设计。对30例已完成的干预病例进行描述性分析,以审查模型与干预实施计划的保真度。在2021年11月至2022年3月期间,八名治疗师参加了半结构化访谈,探讨了提供JPM的可接受性、障碍和促进者。结果:对James’Place审计记录的描述性分析显示,治疗师对JPM的依从性很高,但该模型的突出部分需要根据男性个体的需求进行定制。专题分析提出了五个专题。第一个主题,治疗环境强调了治疗环境的重要性。确定的第二个主题是JPM的专门自杀预防培训,以促进治疗师的理解和专业知识。确定的第三个主题是治疗参与,讨论男性参与治疗的情况。第四个主题,以人为中心的护理,涉及JPM组成部分的交付调整。最后一个主题,使JPM适应个人需求,描述了治疗师对JPM的定制,以满足男性个人的需求。结论:这些发现证明了治疗师的可接受性和他们对JPM的适度坚持。JPM的灵活性使模型和联合治疗能够适应男性的需求。讨论了对临床实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A mixed-methods evaluation of the acceptability and fidelity of the James' Place model for men experiencing suicidal crisis.

A mixed-methods evaluation of the acceptability and fidelity of the James' Place model for men experiencing suicidal crisis.

A mixed-methods evaluation of the acceptability and fidelity of the James' Place model for men experiencing suicidal crisis.

Background: Research supports development of informal, community-based suicide prevention interventions that can be tailored to suit men's unmet needs. The James' Place model (JPM) is a community-based, clinical suicide prevention intervention for men experiencing suicidal crisis. Evidence supports the efficacy of the JPM and there are plans to expand to additional sites across the UK. This study evaluates therapists perceived acceptability of the JPM, and if fidelity to the planned delivery of the model is maintained within therapeutic practice.

Method: A mixed-methods design was used. Descriptive analyses of 30 completed intervention cases were examined to review fidelity of the model against the intervention delivery plan. Eight therapists took part in semi-structured interviews between November 2021 and March 2022 exploring the perceived acceptability, and barriers and facilitators to delivering the JPM.

Results: Descriptive analyses of James' Place audit notes revealed high levels of adherence to the JPM amongst therapists, but highlighted components of the model needed to be tailored according to individual men's needs. Thematic analysis led to the development of five themes. The first theme, therapeutic environment highlighted importance of the therapy setting. The second theme identified was specialised suicide prevention training in the JPM that facilitated therapists understanding and expertise. The third theme identified was therapy engagement which discusses men's engagement in therapy. The fourth theme, person-centred care related to adaptation of delivery of JPM components. The final theme, adapting the JPM to individual needs describes tailoring of the JPM by therapists to be responsive to individual men's needs.

Conclusion: The findings evidence therapist's acceptability and their moderate adherence to the JPM. Flexibility in delivery of the JPM enables adaptation of the model and co-production of therapy to meet men's needs. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
57
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine: an Open Access Journal (HPBM) publishes theoretical and empirical contributions on all aspects of research and practice into psychosocial, behavioral and biomedical aspects of health. HPBM publishes international, interdisciplinary research with diverse methodological approaches on: Assessment and diagnosis Narratives, experiences and discourses of health and illness Treatment processes and recovery Health cognitions and behaviors at population and individual levels Psychosocial an behavioral prevention interventions Psychosocial determinants and consequences of behavior Social and cultural contexts of health and illness, health disparities Health, illness and medicine Application of advanced information and communication technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信