生物医学教育中的游戏化:Resimion的成功实施,一种基于场景的学习工具。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
British Journal of Biomedical Science Pub Date : 2023-10-02 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/bjbs.2023.11756
Jennifer E May, Elizabeth Anderson, Dan Clark, Jonathon Hull
{"title":"生物医学教育中的游戏化:Resimion的成功实施,一种基于场景的学习工具。","authors":"Jennifer E May,&nbsp;Elizabeth Anderson,&nbsp;Dan Clark,&nbsp;Jonathon Hull","doi":"10.3389/bjbs.2023.11756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Scenario-based learning and gamification have many advantages in comparison to traditional didactic teaching methods, including development of many higher-level skills such as analysis and evaluation. It is hoped that these simulations provide a real-world experience in a format accessible to students. Integration of these tools into teaching excelled during the COVID-19 pandemic, an event that completely changed education and initiated the greatest advancement in digital learning to date. We discuss our experiences using Resimion, a novel scenario-based learning tool that was adapted to biomedical science, both for teaching and assessment. <b>Methods:</b> Our cohort included 769 students studying BSc(Hons) Biomedical Science at the University of the West of England from 2020 to 2023. Data was obtained from assessments within four different modules, two at FHEQ level 5 and two at level 6. Students were grouped based on reasonable adjustment (RA) status, including physical issues, specific learning differences and neurodiversity, with differences between student groups and assessment types analysed by ANOVA. <b>Results:</b> Data clearly demonstrate good engagement from students utilising Resimion software, representing 18,436 student interactions in total, across both assessed and non-assessed activities. RAs of any type did not alter submission rates (<i>p</i> = 0.53) or student outcome in any of the assessment types analysed. However, submission rates for Resimion assessments were notably higher than for other assessment types (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Whist outcomes were not significantly different, students with RAs did take significantly longer to complete the Haematology and Transfusion assessments (<i>p</i> = 0.0012). Specifically, neurodiverse students and those with specific learning differences used on average 81% of their allocated time, students with other RAs used 76%, whereas students without RAs used just 56% (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001), highlighting the appropriate adjustment of extra time provided for these students. It was further observed that 1.3% of Resimion activities undertaken by students utilised the in-built inclusivity features in the software. Both students with known RAs, and those without, utilised these features, therefore also aiding students without a formal diagnosis. <b>Conclusion:</b> The scenario-based learning tool Resimion was successfully integrated into the teaching of biomedical science and provided an engaging platform for students, with comparable results to other traditional assessment types.</p>","PeriodicalId":9236,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","volume":"80 ","pages":"11756"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gamification in Biomedical Science Education: The Successful Implementation of Resimion, a Scenario-Based Learning Tool.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer E May,&nbsp;Elizabeth Anderson,&nbsp;Dan Clark,&nbsp;Jonathon Hull\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/bjbs.2023.11756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Scenario-based learning and gamification have many advantages in comparison to traditional didactic teaching methods, including development of many higher-level skills such as analysis and evaluation. It is hoped that these simulations provide a real-world experience in a format accessible to students. Integration of these tools into teaching excelled during the COVID-19 pandemic, an event that completely changed education and initiated the greatest advancement in digital learning to date. We discuss our experiences using Resimion, a novel scenario-based learning tool that was adapted to biomedical science, both for teaching and assessment. <b>Methods:</b> Our cohort included 769 students studying BSc(Hons) Biomedical Science at the University of the West of England from 2020 to 2023. Data was obtained from assessments within four different modules, two at FHEQ level 5 and two at level 6. Students were grouped based on reasonable adjustment (RA) status, including physical issues, specific learning differences and neurodiversity, with differences between student groups and assessment types analysed by ANOVA. <b>Results:</b> Data clearly demonstrate good engagement from students utilising Resimion software, representing 18,436 student interactions in total, across both assessed and non-assessed activities. RAs of any type did not alter submission rates (<i>p</i> = 0.53) or student outcome in any of the assessment types analysed. However, submission rates for Resimion assessments were notably higher than for other assessment types (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Whist outcomes were not significantly different, students with RAs did take significantly longer to complete the Haematology and Transfusion assessments (<i>p</i> = 0.0012). Specifically, neurodiverse students and those with specific learning differences used on average 81% of their allocated time, students with other RAs used 76%, whereas students without RAs used just 56% (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001), highlighting the appropriate adjustment of extra time provided for these students. It was further observed that 1.3% of Resimion activities undertaken by students utilised the in-built inclusivity features in the software. Both students with known RAs, and those without, utilised these features, therefore also aiding students without a formal diagnosis. <b>Conclusion:</b> The scenario-based learning tool Resimion was successfully integrated into the teaching of biomedical science and provided an engaging platform for students, with comparable results to other traditional assessment types.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Biomedical Science\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"11756\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577182/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Biomedical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2023.11756\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2023.11756","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:与传统的教学方法相比,基于场景的学习和游戏化有很多优势,包括开发许多更高层次的技能,如分析和评估。希望这些模拟以学生可以访问的形式提供真实世界的体验。在新冠肺炎大流行期间,这些工具与教学的结合表现出色,这一事件彻底改变了教育,并启动了迄今为止数字学习的最大进步。我们讨论了使用Resimion的经验,Resimion是一种新的基于场景的学习工具,适用于生物医学科学,用于教学和评估。方法:我们的队列包括2020年至2023年在西英格兰大学学习生物医学理学学士(荣誉)的769名学生。数据来自四个不同模块的评估,其中两个在FHEQ 5级,两个在6级。根据合理调整(RA)状态对学生进行分组,包括身体问题、特定学习差异和神经多样性,并通过方差分析分析学生组和评估类型之间的差异。结果:数据清楚地表明,使用Resimion软件的学生参与度很高,在评估和非评估活动中,共有18436次学生互动。在所分析的任何评估类型中,任何类型的RA都不会改变提交率(p=0.53)或学生成绩。然而,Resimion评估的提交率明显高于其他评估类型(p=0.002)。Whist结果没有显著差异,患有RA的学生确实需要更长的时间来完成血液学和输血评估(p=0.0012)。具体而言,神经多样性学生和有特定学习差异的学生平均使用了81%的分配时间,有其他RA的学生使用了76%,而没有RA的学生仅使用了56%(p≤0.0001),这突出了为这些学生提供的额外时间的适当调整。进一步观察到,学生进行的Resimion活动中有1.3%使用了软件中内置的包容性功能。有已知RA的学生和没有RA的学生都利用了这些特征,因此也帮助了没有正式诊断的学生。结论:基于场景的学习工具Resimion成功地融入了生物医学科学的教学中,为学生提供了一个引人入胜的平台,其结果与其他传统评估类型相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Gamification in Biomedical Science Education: The Successful Implementation of Resimion, a Scenario-Based Learning Tool.

Gamification in Biomedical Science Education: The Successful Implementation of Resimion, a Scenario-Based Learning Tool.

Gamification in Biomedical Science Education: The Successful Implementation of Resimion, a Scenario-Based Learning Tool.

Gamification in Biomedical Science Education: The Successful Implementation of Resimion, a Scenario-Based Learning Tool.

Introduction: Scenario-based learning and gamification have many advantages in comparison to traditional didactic teaching methods, including development of many higher-level skills such as analysis and evaluation. It is hoped that these simulations provide a real-world experience in a format accessible to students. Integration of these tools into teaching excelled during the COVID-19 pandemic, an event that completely changed education and initiated the greatest advancement in digital learning to date. We discuss our experiences using Resimion, a novel scenario-based learning tool that was adapted to biomedical science, both for teaching and assessment. Methods: Our cohort included 769 students studying BSc(Hons) Biomedical Science at the University of the West of England from 2020 to 2023. Data was obtained from assessments within four different modules, two at FHEQ level 5 and two at level 6. Students were grouped based on reasonable adjustment (RA) status, including physical issues, specific learning differences and neurodiversity, with differences between student groups and assessment types analysed by ANOVA. Results: Data clearly demonstrate good engagement from students utilising Resimion software, representing 18,436 student interactions in total, across both assessed and non-assessed activities. RAs of any type did not alter submission rates (p = 0.53) or student outcome in any of the assessment types analysed. However, submission rates for Resimion assessments were notably higher than for other assessment types (p = 0.002). Whist outcomes were not significantly different, students with RAs did take significantly longer to complete the Haematology and Transfusion assessments (p = 0.0012). Specifically, neurodiverse students and those with specific learning differences used on average 81% of their allocated time, students with other RAs used 76%, whereas students without RAs used just 56% (p ≤ 0.0001), highlighting the appropriate adjustment of extra time provided for these students. It was further observed that 1.3% of Resimion activities undertaken by students utilised the in-built inclusivity features in the software. Both students with known RAs, and those without, utilised these features, therefore also aiding students without a formal diagnosis. Conclusion: The scenario-based learning tool Resimion was successfully integrated into the teaching of biomedical science and provided an engaging platform for students, with comparable results to other traditional assessment types.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Biomedical Science
British Journal of Biomedical Science 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Biomedical Science is committed to publishing high quality original research that represents a clear advance in the practice of biomedical science, and reviews that summarise recent advances in the field of biomedical science. The overall aim of the Journal is to provide a platform for the dissemination of new and innovative information on the diagnosis and management of disease that is valuable to the practicing laboratory scientist.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信