青春期的自杀风险:Covitality是解决方案的一部分吗?

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Archives of Suicide Research Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1080/13811118.2023.2262553
Raquel Falcó, Elisa Santana-Monagas, Beatriz Moreno-Amador, Jose A Piqueras, Juan C Marzo
{"title":"青春期的自杀风险:Covitality是解决方案的一部分吗?","authors":"Raquel Falcó, Elisa Santana-Monagas, Beatriz Moreno-Amador, Jose A Piqueras, Juan C Marzo","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2023.2262553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The covitality model suggests that the co-disposition and synergy of core psychosocial assets (i.e., covitality) buffer the negative impact of stressful events and prevent the emergence of mental health problems during adolescence. At this stage of development, suicide already constitutes the leading cause of unnatural death in Europe. The present study aimed to examine how covitality relates to bidimensional mental health status (i.e., psychopathology and subjective well-being) and suicidal risk.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 5,296 Spanish students ages 12 to 18 years (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> ± <i>SD</i> = 14.19 ± 1.53), 50.2% male.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a structural equation mediational model, covitality acted as a powerful shield of psychosocial strengths against suicidality, via an indirect effect entirely mediated by its impact on bidimensional mental health. The total variance in suicidal risk explained by the set of independent variables was 61.8%, while the total variance of psychopathology and subjective well-being explained by covitality was 54.1% and 75.6%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These preliminary findings highlight the need for further study of covitality as a defense strategy against adolescent suicide. HIGHLIGHTSCovitality promote subjective well-being and prevent psychopathological symptoms.These self-perceived psychosocial strengths do not have direct effect on suicidality.Covitality is related to lower suicidal risk through indirect mechanisms: via bidimensional approach to mental health status (BMH).</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suicidal Risk During Adolescence: Could Covitality Be Part of the Solution?\",\"authors\":\"Raquel Falcó, Elisa Santana-Monagas, Beatriz Moreno-Amador, Jose A Piqueras, Juan C Marzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13811118.2023.2262553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The covitality model suggests that the co-disposition and synergy of core psychosocial assets (i.e., covitality) buffer the negative impact of stressful events and prevent the emergence of mental health problems during adolescence. At this stage of development, suicide already constitutes the leading cause of unnatural death in Europe. The present study aimed to examine how covitality relates to bidimensional mental health status (i.e., psychopathology and subjective well-being) and suicidal risk.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 5,296 Spanish students ages 12 to 18 years (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> ± <i>SD</i> = 14.19 ± 1.53), 50.2% male.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a structural equation mediational model, covitality acted as a powerful shield of psychosocial strengths against suicidality, via an indirect effect entirely mediated by its impact on bidimensional mental health. The total variance in suicidal risk explained by the set of independent variables was 61.8%, while the total variance of psychopathology and subjective well-being explained by covitality was 54.1% and 75.6%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These preliminary findings highlight the need for further study of covitality as a defense strategy against adolescent suicide. HIGHLIGHTSCovitality promote subjective well-being and prevent psychopathological symptoms.These self-perceived psychosocial strengths do not have direct effect on suicidality.Covitality is related to lower suicidal risk through indirect mechanisms: via bidimensional approach to mental health status (BMH).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Suicide Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Suicide Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2023.2262553\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Suicide Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2023.2262553","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:Covidity模型表明,核心心理社会资产(即Covidity)的共同处置和协同作用可以缓冲压力事件的负面影响,防止青春期心理健康问题的出现。在这个发展阶段,自杀已经成为欧洲非自然死亡的主要原因。本研究旨在检验covitality如何与二维心理健康状况(即精神病理学和主观幸福感)和自杀风险相关。方法:参与者为5296名年龄在12至18岁之间的西班牙学生 年(Mage±SD = 14.19 ± 1.53),50.2%为男性。结果:在结构方程中介模型中,covitality通过一种完全由其对二维心理健康的影响介导的间接效应,充当了对抗自杀的心理社会力量的强大屏障。自变量组解释的自杀风险的总方差为61.8%,而covitality解释的精神病理学和主观幸福感的总方差分别为54.1%和75.6%。结论:这些初步发现强调了进一步研究covitality作为预防青少年自杀的防御策略的必要性。亮点:自信能促进主观幸福感,预防精神病理症状。这些自我感知的心理社会力量对自杀没有直接影响。Covitality通过间接机制与降低自杀风险有关:通过心理健康状况的二维方法(BMH)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Suicidal Risk During Adolescence: Could Covitality Be Part of the Solution?

Objective: The covitality model suggests that the co-disposition and synergy of core psychosocial assets (i.e., covitality) buffer the negative impact of stressful events and prevent the emergence of mental health problems during adolescence. At this stage of development, suicide already constitutes the leading cause of unnatural death in Europe. The present study aimed to examine how covitality relates to bidimensional mental health status (i.e., psychopathology and subjective well-being) and suicidal risk.

Method: Participants were 5,296 Spanish students ages 12 to 18 years (Mage ± SD = 14.19 ± 1.53), 50.2% male.

Results: In a structural equation mediational model, covitality acted as a powerful shield of psychosocial strengths against suicidality, via an indirect effect entirely mediated by its impact on bidimensional mental health. The total variance in suicidal risk explained by the set of independent variables was 61.8%, while the total variance of psychopathology and subjective well-being explained by covitality was 54.1% and 75.6%, respectively.

Conclusions: These preliminary findings highlight the need for further study of covitality as a defense strategy against adolescent suicide. HIGHLIGHTSCovitality promote subjective well-being and prevent psychopathological symptoms.These self-perceived psychosocial strengths do not have direct effect on suicidality.Covitality is related to lower suicidal risk through indirect mechanisms: via bidimensional approach to mental health status (BMH).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Archives of Suicide Research, the official journal of the International Academy of Suicide Research (IASR), is the international journal in the field of suicidology. The journal features original, refereed contributions on the study of suicide, suicidal behavior, its causes and effects, and techniques for prevention. The journal incorporates research-based and theoretical articles contributed by a diverse range of authors interested in investigating the biological, pharmacological, psychiatric, psychological, and sociological aspects of suicide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信