社区环境中多发病率:观察性研究的系统综述和荟萃分析。

Journal of comorbidity Pub Date : 2019-08-22 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2235042X19870934
Hai Nguyen, Gergana Manolova, Christina Daskalopoulou, Silia Vitoratou, Martin Prince, A Matthew Prina
{"title":"社区环境中多发病率:观察性研究的系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Hai Nguyen,&nbsp;Gergana Manolova,&nbsp;Christina Daskalopoulou,&nbsp;Silia Vitoratou,&nbsp;Martin Prince,&nbsp;A Matthew Prina","doi":"10.1177/2235042X19870934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With ageing world populations, multimorbidity (presence of two or more chronic diseases in the same individual) becomes a major concern in public health. Although multimorbidity is associated with age, its prevalence varies. This systematic review aimed to summarise and meta-analyse the prevalence of multimorbidity in high, low- and middle-income countries (HICs and LMICs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were identified by searching electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Global Health, Web of Science and Cochrane Library). The term 'multimorbidity' and its various spellings were used, alongside 'prevalence' or 'epidemiology'. Quality assessment employed the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Overall and stratified analyses according to multimorbidity operational definitions, HICs/LMICs status, gender and age were performed. A random-effects model for meta-analysis was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy community-based studies (conducted in 18 HICs and 31 LMICs) were included in the final sample. Sample sizes ranged from 264 to 162,464. The overall pooled prevalence of multimorbidity was 33.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 30.0-36.3%). There was a considerable difference in the pooled estimates between HICs and LMICs, with prevalence being 37.9% (95% CI: 32.5-43.4%) and 29.7% (26.4-33.0%), respectively. Heterogeneity across studies was high for both overall and stratified analyses (<i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> > 99%). A sensitivity analysis showed that none of the reviewed studies skewed the overall pooled estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A large proportion of the global population, especially those aged 65+, is affected by multimorbidity. To allow accurate estimations of disease burden, and effective disease management and resources distribution, a standardised operationalisation of multimorbidity is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":92071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comorbidity","volume":"9 ","pages":"2235042X19870934"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2235042X19870934","citationCount":"253","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of multimorbidity in community settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.\",\"authors\":\"Hai Nguyen,&nbsp;Gergana Manolova,&nbsp;Christina Daskalopoulou,&nbsp;Silia Vitoratou,&nbsp;Martin Prince,&nbsp;A Matthew Prina\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2235042X19870934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With ageing world populations, multimorbidity (presence of two or more chronic diseases in the same individual) becomes a major concern in public health. Although multimorbidity is associated with age, its prevalence varies. This systematic review aimed to summarise and meta-analyse the prevalence of multimorbidity in high, low- and middle-income countries (HICs and LMICs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were identified by searching electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Global Health, Web of Science and Cochrane Library). The term 'multimorbidity' and its various spellings were used, alongside 'prevalence' or 'epidemiology'. Quality assessment employed the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Overall and stratified analyses according to multimorbidity operational definitions, HICs/LMICs status, gender and age were performed. A random-effects model for meta-analysis was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy community-based studies (conducted in 18 HICs and 31 LMICs) were included in the final sample. Sample sizes ranged from 264 to 162,464. The overall pooled prevalence of multimorbidity was 33.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 30.0-36.3%). There was a considerable difference in the pooled estimates between HICs and LMICs, with prevalence being 37.9% (95% CI: 32.5-43.4%) and 29.7% (26.4-33.0%), respectively. Heterogeneity across studies was high for both overall and stratified analyses (<i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> > 99%). A sensitivity analysis showed that none of the reviewed studies skewed the overall pooled estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A large proportion of the global population, especially those aged 65+, is affected by multimorbidity. To allow accurate estimations of disease burden, and effective disease management and resources distribution, a standardised operationalisation of multimorbidity is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"2235042X19870934\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2235042X19870934\",\"citationCount\":\"253\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2235042X19870934\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2235042X19870934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 253

摘要

背景:随着世界人口老龄化,多发病(同一个人患有两种或两种以上慢性病)成为公共卫生中的一个主要问题。尽管多发病与年龄有关,但其患病率各不相同。本系统综述旨在总结和荟萃分析高收入、低收入和中等收入国家(HICs和LMIC)的多发病率。方法:通过搜索电子数据库(Medline、Embase、PsycINFO、Global Health、Web of Science和Cochrane Library)来确定研究。“多发病”一词及其各种拼写与“流行率”或“流行病学”一起使用。质量评估采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表。根据多发病操作定义、HICs/LMIC状况、性别和年龄进行了全面和分层分析。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。结果:70项基于社区的研究(在18个HIC和31个LMIC中进行)被纳入最终样本。样本量从264到162464不等。多发性疾病的总体合并患病率为33.1%(95%置信区间(CI):30.0-36.3%)。HIC和LMIC之间的合并估计值存在相当大的差异,患病率分别为37.9%(95%置信度:32.5-43.4%)和29.7%(26.4-33.0%)。研究之间的异质性在整体分析和分层分析中都很高(I2>99%)。敏感性分析显示,没有一项被审查的研究偏离了总体汇总估计。结论:全球很大一部分人口,尤其是65岁以上的人口,受到多发病的影响。为了准确估计疾病负担,并进行有效的疾病管理和资源分配,需要对多发病进行标准化操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prevalence of multimorbidity in community settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Prevalence of multimorbidity in community settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Prevalence of multimorbidity in community settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Prevalence of multimorbidity in community settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Background: With ageing world populations, multimorbidity (presence of two or more chronic diseases in the same individual) becomes a major concern in public health. Although multimorbidity is associated with age, its prevalence varies. This systematic review aimed to summarise and meta-analyse the prevalence of multimorbidity in high, low- and middle-income countries (HICs and LMICs).

Methods: Studies were identified by searching electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Global Health, Web of Science and Cochrane Library). The term 'multimorbidity' and its various spellings were used, alongside 'prevalence' or 'epidemiology'. Quality assessment employed the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Overall and stratified analyses according to multimorbidity operational definitions, HICs/LMICs status, gender and age were performed. A random-effects model for meta-analysis was used.

Results: Seventy community-based studies (conducted in 18 HICs and 31 LMICs) were included in the final sample. Sample sizes ranged from 264 to 162,464. The overall pooled prevalence of multimorbidity was 33.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 30.0-36.3%). There was a considerable difference in the pooled estimates between HICs and LMICs, with prevalence being 37.9% (95% CI: 32.5-43.4%) and 29.7% (26.4-33.0%), respectively. Heterogeneity across studies was high for both overall and stratified analyses (I 2 > 99%). A sensitivity analysis showed that none of the reviewed studies skewed the overall pooled estimates.

Conclusion: A large proportion of the global population, especially those aged 65+, is affected by multimorbidity. To allow accurate estimations of disease burden, and effective disease management and resources distribution, a standardised operationalisation of multimorbidity is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信