Pauwels 3型股骨颈骨折第三代股骨复合骨模型固定方法的生物力学比较:内侧支撑板对固定的贡献。

Feyzi Kılıç, Abdulkadir Polat, Fatih Yamak, Ergün Bozdag, Fırat Fidan, Hakan Başar
{"title":"Pauwels 3型股骨颈骨折第三代股骨复合骨模型固定方法的生物力学比较:内侧支撑板对固定的贡献。","authors":"Feyzi Kılıç, Abdulkadir Polat, Fatih Yamak, Ergün Bozdag, Fırat Fidan, Hakan Başar","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2023.22127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the use of cannulated screws in an inverted triangular configuration, medial buttress plates, and the combination of these 2 fixation methods in the treatment of Pauwels type 3 femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight anatomical composite third-generation femoral bone models were divided into 4 groups. The control group (group 1) was formed with 7 third-generation intact bone models. The fracture model was created with a 70° cutting block to fit 21 Pauwels type 3 fracture configurations. Seven models were fixed with an isolated 3.5 mm one-third semi-tubular medial buttress plate (group 2), 7 were fixed in an inverted triangular configuration with 6.5 mm cannulated screws (group 3), and 7 were fixed using a combination of 6.5 mm cannulated screws and a medial buttress plate (group 4). Cyclic loading was applied using axial forces ranging from 60 N to 600 N and moments ranging from 0.7 Nm to 7.0 Nm for 500 cycles. Once the cyclic loading stage was completed, the loads were removed from the system, and the quasi-static loading stage was employed to determine the stiffness and failure forces of the system under both axial and torsional forces. Quasi-static tests were performed with an axial speed of 1.8 mm/min and a torsional speed of 4.5°/min. The biomechanical properties of all groups were examined in terms of axial stiffness, torsional stiffness, and maximum axial force parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stiffness values of groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 303 ± 35.8 N/mm, 159.6 ± 25 N/mm, 232 ± 35.9 N/mm, and 366.9 ± 58 N/mm, respectively, under axial forces (P < .01); 2172.7 ± 252.1 Nmm/°, 1225.3 ± 238.6 Nmm/°, 2123 ± 359.4 Nmm/°, and 2721.85 ± 304 Nmm/°, respectively, under torsional moments (P < .01); and 2072.1 ± 256.1 N, 1379.9 ± 290.6 N, 2099.1 ± 454.2 N, and 2648.4 ± 364.6 N, respectively, under the maximum force (P < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that in the fixation of Pauwels type 3 fractures formed on third-generation bone models, the utilization of half-thread cannulated screws in an inverted triangle configuration, along with a medial buttress plate, provided stronger fixation compared to the remaining implant groups and the control group. According to the evaluation of the parameters, the isolated application of a medial buttress plate had poorer biomechanical properties than other fixation methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":93854,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":" ","pages":"243-249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10724781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical comparison of fixation methods on third-generation femoral composite bone models in Pauwels type 3 femoral neck fractures: Contribution of the medial buttress plate to fixation.\",\"authors\":\"Feyzi Kılıç, Abdulkadir Polat, Fatih Yamak, Ergün Bozdag, Fırat Fidan, Hakan Başar\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/j.aott.2023.22127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the use of cannulated screws in an inverted triangular configuration, medial buttress plates, and the combination of these 2 fixation methods in the treatment of Pauwels type 3 femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight anatomical composite third-generation femoral bone models were divided into 4 groups. The control group (group 1) was formed with 7 third-generation intact bone models. The fracture model was created with a 70° cutting block to fit 21 Pauwels type 3 fracture configurations. Seven models were fixed with an isolated 3.5 mm one-third semi-tubular medial buttress plate (group 2), 7 were fixed in an inverted triangular configuration with 6.5 mm cannulated screws (group 3), and 7 were fixed using a combination of 6.5 mm cannulated screws and a medial buttress plate (group 4). Cyclic loading was applied using axial forces ranging from 60 N to 600 N and moments ranging from 0.7 Nm to 7.0 Nm for 500 cycles. Once the cyclic loading stage was completed, the loads were removed from the system, and the quasi-static loading stage was employed to determine the stiffness and failure forces of the system under both axial and torsional forces. Quasi-static tests were performed with an axial speed of 1.8 mm/min and a torsional speed of 4.5°/min. The biomechanical properties of all groups were examined in terms of axial stiffness, torsional stiffness, and maximum axial force parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stiffness values of groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 303 ± 35.8 N/mm, 159.6 ± 25 N/mm, 232 ± 35.9 N/mm, and 366.9 ± 58 N/mm, respectively, under axial forces (P < .01); 2172.7 ± 252.1 Nmm/°, 1225.3 ± 238.6 Nmm/°, 2123 ± 359.4 Nmm/°, and 2721.85 ± 304 Nmm/°, respectively, under torsional moments (P < .01); and 2072.1 ± 256.1 N, 1379.9 ± 290.6 N, 2099.1 ± 454.2 N, and 2648.4 ± 364.6 N, respectively, under the maximum force (P < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that in the fixation of Pauwels type 3 fractures formed on third-generation bone models, the utilization of half-thread cannulated screws in an inverted triangle configuration, along with a medial buttress plate, provided stronger fixation compared to the remaining implant groups and the control group. According to the evaluation of the parameters, the isolated application of a medial buttress plate had poorer biomechanical properties than other fixation methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"243-249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10724781/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2023.22127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2023.22127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较倒三角形空心螺钉、内侧支撑钢板和这两种固定方法在治疗Pauwels 3型股骨颈骨折中的应用。方法:将28个解剖型复合第三代股骨模型分为4组。对照组(第1组)由7个第三代完整骨模型组成。使用70°切割块创建骨折模型,以适应21种Pauwels 3型骨折配置。7个模型用分离的3.5mm三分之一半管状内侧支撑板固定(第2组),7个用6.5mm空心螺钉以倒三角形结构固定(第3组),以及7个用6.5 mm空心螺钉和内侧支撑板的组合固定(第4组)。使用范围为60N至600N的轴向力和范围为0.7Nm至7.0Nm的力矩施加循环载荷达500次循环。循环加载阶段完成后,从系统中移除负载,并采用准静态加载阶段来确定系统在轴向力和扭转力下的刚度和破坏力。以1.8mm/min的轴向速度和4.5°/min的扭转速度进行准静态测试。根据轴向刚度、扭转刚度和最大轴向力参数检查所有组的生物力学特性。结果:第1、2、3和4组在轴向力作用下的刚度值分别为303±35.8 N/mm、159.6±25 N/mm、232±35.9 N/mm和366.9±58 N/mm(P<0.01);扭矩下分别为2172.7±252.1 Nmm/°、1225.3±238.6 Nmm/°,2123±359.4 Nmm/°和2721.85±304 Nmm/°(P<0.01);最大力下分别为2072.1±256.1N、1379.9±290.6N、2099.1±454.2N和2648.4±364.6N(P<0.01),与其余植入物组和对照组相比提供了更强的固定。根据参数评估,单独应用内侧支撑板的生物力学性能比其他固定方法差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biomechanical comparison of fixation methods on third-generation femoral composite bone models in Pauwels type 3 femoral neck fractures: Contribution of the medial buttress plate to fixation.

Objective: To compare the use of cannulated screws in an inverted triangular configuration, medial buttress plates, and the combination of these 2 fixation methods in the treatment of Pauwels type 3 femoral neck fractures.

Methods: Twenty-eight anatomical composite third-generation femoral bone models were divided into 4 groups. The control group (group 1) was formed with 7 third-generation intact bone models. The fracture model was created with a 70° cutting block to fit 21 Pauwels type 3 fracture configurations. Seven models were fixed with an isolated 3.5 mm one-third semi-tubular medial buttress plate (group 2), 7 were fixed in an inverted triangular configuration with 6.5 mm cannulated screws (group 3), and 7 were fixed using a combination of 6.5 mm cannulated screws and a medial buttress plate (group 4). Cyclic loading was applied using axial forces ranging from 60 N to 600 N and moments ranging from 0.7 Nm to 7.0 Nm for 500 cycles. Once the cyclic loading stage was completed, the loads were removed from the system, and the quasi-static loading stage was employed to determine the stiffness and failure forces of the system under both axial and torsional forces. Quasi-static tests were performed with an axial speed of 1.8 mm/min and a torsional speed of 4.5°/min. The biomechanical properties of all groups were examined in terms of axial stiffness, torsional stiffness, and maximum axial force parameters.

Results: The stiffness values of groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 303 ± 35.8 N/mm, 159.6 ± 25 N/mm, 232 ± 35.9 N/mm, and 366.9 ± 58 N/mm, respectively, under axial forces (P < .01); 2172.7 ± 252.1 Nmm/°, 1225.3 ± 238.6 Nmm/°, 2123 ± 359.4 Nmm/°, and 2721.85 ± 304 Nmm/°, respectively, under torsional moments (P < .01); and 2072.1 ± 256.1 N, 1379.9 ± 290.6 N, 2099.1 ± 454.2 N, and 2648.4 ± 364.6 N, respectively, under the maximum force (P < .01).

Conclusion: This study showed that in the fixation of Pauwels type 3 fractures formed on third-generation bone models, the utilization of half-thread cannulated screws in an inverted triangle configuration, along with a medial buttress plate, provided stronger fixation compared to the remaining implant groups and the control group. According to the evaluation of the parameters, the isolated application of a medial buttress plate had poorer biomechanical properties than other fixation methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信