第一行转移性非小细胞肺癌癌症治疗环境中生物标志物检测率和靶向治疗的适当应用模式。

Casey Mason, Peter G Ellis, Kathy Lokay, Amanda Barry, Natalie Dickson, Ray Page, Blase Polite, Ravi Salgia, Michael Savin, Corey Shamah, Mark A Socinski
{"title":"第一行转移性非小细胞肺癌癌症治疗环境中生物标志物检测率和靶向治疗的适当应用模式。","authors":"Casey Mason,&nbsp;Peter G Ellis,&nbsp;Kathy Lokay,&nbsp;Amanda Barry,&nbsp;Natalie Dickson,&nbsp;Ray Page,&nbsp;Blase Polite,&nbsp;Ravi Salgia,&nbsp;Michael Savin,&nbsp;Corey Shamah,&nbsp;Mark A Socinski","doi":"10.25270/jcp.2018.02.00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite clear clinical benefit and guideline recommendations for predictive biomarker testing and subsequent first-line targeted therapy treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there is evidence that testing has not been widely embraced in the clinical setting. This study uses clinical pathways to understand biomarker testing patterns and ensuing first-line treatment decisions. Data of patients with metastatic NSCLC were analyzed for testing rates and treatment selection at 7 cancer programs using data input by providers into the pathways software. Findings were analyzed by type of provider (community or academic). Among providers using clinical pathways, biomarker testing rates were high and appropriate selection of targeted therapy was observed. Clinical pathways can act as a tool to assist oncology practices to promote testing of key biomarkers and subsequent selection of appropriate therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"4 1","pages":"49-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709712/pdf/nihms-1044068.pdf","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of Biomarker Testing Rates and Appropriate Use of Targeted Therapy in the First-Line, Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Casey Mason,&nbsp;Peter G Ellis,&nbsp;Kathy Lokay,&nbsp;Amanda Barry,&nbsp;Natalie Dickson,&nbsp;Ray Page,&nbsp;Blase Polite,&nbsp;Ravi Salgia,&nbsp;Michael Savin,&nbsp;Corey Shamah,&nbsp;Mark A Socinski\",\"doi\":\"10.25270/jcp.2018.02.00001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite clear clinical benefit and guideline recommendations for predictive biomarker testing and subsequent first-line targeted therapy treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there is evidence that testing has not been widely embraced in the clinical setting. This study uses clinical pathways to understand biomarker testing patterns and ensuing first-line treatment decisions. Data of patients with metastatic NSCLC were analyzed for testing rates and treatment selection at 7 cancer programs using data input by providers into the pathways software. Findings were analyzed by type of provider (community or academic). Among providers using clinical pathways, biomarker testing rates were high and appropriate selection of targeted therapy was observed. Clinical pathways can act as a tool to assist oncology practices to promote testing of key biomarkers and subsequent selection of appropriate therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"49-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709712/pdf/nihms-1044068.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25270/jcp.2018.02.00001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jcp.2018.02.00001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

尽管预测性生物标志物检测和随后的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者一线靶向治疗有明确的临床益处和指南建议,但有证据表明,检测尚未在临床环境中得到广泛应用。这项研究使用临床途径来了解生物标志物检测模式和随后的一线治疗决策。在7个癌症项目中,使用提供者输入到路径软件中的数据,分析转移性NSCLC患者的数据,以确定检测率和治疗选择。研究结果按提供者类型(社区或学术)进行分析。在使用临床途径的提供者中,生物标志物检测率很高,并观察到靶向治疗的适当选择。临床途径可以作为一种工具,帮助肿瘤学实践促进关键生物标志物的测试和随后适当治疗的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patterns of Biomarker Testing Rates and Appropriate Use of Targeted Therapy in the First-Line, Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment Setting.

Despite clear clinical benefit and guideline recommendations for predictive biomarker testing and subsequent first-line targeted therapy treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there is evidence that testing has not been widely embraced in the clinical setting. This study uses clinical pathways to understand biomarker testing patterns and ensuing first-line treatment decisions. Data of patients with metastatic NSCLC were analyzed for testing rates and treatment selection at 7 cancer programs using data input by providers into the pathways software. Findings were analyzed by type of provider (community or academic). Among providers using clinical pathways, biomarker testing rates were high and appropriate selection of targeted therapy was observed. Clinical pathways can act as a tool to assist oncology practices to promote testing of key biomarkers and subsequent selection of appropriate therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信