气道超声在预测困难喉镜检查中的定量研究:一项前瞻性研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Lin Ning , Xing Zhu , Hong-Chao Li , Shi-Jie Zhou , Qi-Wei Zhang , Hong-Yu Zou , Qing-Xiang Mao , Hong Yan
{"title":"气道超声在预测困难喉镜检查中的定量研究:一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"Lin Ning ,&nbsp;Xing Zhu ,&nbsp;Hong-Chao Li ,&nbsp;Shi-Jie Zhou ,&nbsp;Qi-Wei Zhang ,&nbsp;Hong-Yu Zou ,&nbsp;Qing-Xiang Mao ,&nbsp;Hong Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>As common clinical screening tests cannot effectively predict a difficult airway, and unanticipated difficult laryngoscopy remains a challenge for physicians. We herein used ultrasound to develop some point-of-care predictors for difficult laryngoscopy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective observational study included 502 patients who underwent laryngoscopy and a detailed sonographic assessment. Patients under 18 years old, or with maxillofacial deformities or fractures, limited mouth opening, limited neck movement or history of neck surgery were excluded from the study. Laryngoscopic views of all patients were scored and grouping using the modified Cormack-Lehane (CL) scoring system. The measurements acquired comprised tongue width, the longitudinal cross-sectional area of the tongue, tongue volume, the mandible-hyoid bone distance, the hyoid bone-glottis distance, the mandible-hyoid bone-glottis angle, the skin-thyrohyoid membrane distance, the glottis-superior edge of the thyroid cartilage distance (DGTC), the skin-hyoid bone distance, and the epiglottis midway-skin distance. ANOVA and Chi-square were used to compare differences between groups. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for difficult laryngoscopy and it was visualized by receiver operating characteristic curves and nomogram. R version 3.6.3 and SPSS version 26.0 were used for statistical analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Difficult laryngoscopy was indicated in 49 patients (CL grade Ⅲ – Ⅳ) and easy laryngoscopy in 453 patients (CL grade Ⅰ – Ⅱ). The ultrasound-measured mandible-hyoid bone-glottis angle and DGTC significantly differed between the 2 groups (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Difficult laryngoscopy was predicted by an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.930 with a threshold mandible-hyoid bone-glottis angle of 125.5° and by an AUC of 0.722 with a threshold DGTC of 1.22 cm. The longitudinal cross-sectional area of the tongue, tongue width, tongue volume, the mandible-hyoid distance, and the hyoid-glottis distance did not significantly differ between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Difficult laryngoscopy may be anticipated in patients in whom the mandible-hyoid bone-glottis angle is smaller than 125.5° or DGTC is larger than 1.22 cm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51555,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","volume":"26 6","pages":"Pages 351-356"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127523000950/pdfft?md5=4d6f8cd8e11043fb961c3ee7db01c078&pid=1-s2.0-S1008127523000950-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A quantitative study of airway ultrasound in predicting difficult laryngoscopy: A prospective study\",\"authors\":\"Lin Ning ,&nbsp;Xing Zhu ,&nbsp;Hong-Chao Li ,&nbsp;Shi-Jie Zhou ,&nbsp;Qi-Wei Zhang ,&nbsp;Hong-Yu Zou ,&nbsp;Qing-Xiang Mao ,&nbsp;Hong Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.09.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>As common clinical screening tests cannot effectively predict a difficult airway, and unanticipated difficult laryngoscopy remains a challenge for physicians. We herein used ultrasound to develop some point-of-care predictors for difficult laryngoscopy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective observational study included 502 patients who underwent laryngoscopy and a detailed sonographic assessment. Patients under 18 years old, or with maxillofacial deformities or fractures, limited mouth opening, limited neck movement or history of neck surgery were excluded from the study. Laryngoscopic views of all patients were scored and grouping using the modified Cormack-Lehane (CL) scoring system. The measurements acquired comprised tongue width, the longitudinal cross-sectional area of the tongue, tongue volume, the mandible-hyoid bone distance, the hyoid bone-glottis distance, the mandible-hyoid bone-glottis angle, the skin-thyrohyoid membrane distance, the glottis-superior edge of the thyroid cartilage distance (DGTC), the skin-hyoid bone distance, and the epiglottis midway-skin distance. ANOVA and Chi-square were used to compare differences between groups. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for difficult laryngoscopy and it was visualized by receiver operating characteristic curves and nomogram. R version 3.6.3 and SPSS version 26.0 were used for statistical analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Difficult laryngoscopy was indicated in 49 patients (CL grade Ⅲ – Ⅳ) and easy laryngoscopy in 453 patients (CL grade Ⅰ – Ⅱ). The ultrasound-measured mandible-hyoid bone-glottis angle and DGTC significantly differed between the 2 groups (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Difficult laryngoscopy was predicted by an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.930 with a threshold mandible-hyoid bone-glottis angle of 125.5° and by an AUC of 0.722 with a threshold DGTC of 1.22 cm. The longitudinal cross-sectional area of the tongue, tongue width, tongue volume, the mandible-hyoid distance, and the hyoid-glottis distance did not significantly differ between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Difficult laryngoscopy may be anticipated in patients in whom the mandible-hyoid bone-glottis angle is smaller than 125.5° or DGTC is larger than 1.22 cm.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Traumatology\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 351-356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127523000950/pdfft?md5=4d6f8cd8e11043fb961c3ee7db01c078&pid=1-s2.0-S1008127523000950-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127523000950\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127523000950","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于常见的临床筛查测试无法有效预测困难的气道,而出乎意料的困难喉镜检查对医生来说仍然是一个挑战。我们在此使用超声波来开发一些困难喉镜检查的护理点预测因素。方法:这项前瞻性观察研究包括502名接受喉镜检查和详细超声评估的患者。18岁以下、颌面部畸形或骨折、口腔开放受限、颈部活动受限或有颈部手术史的患者被排除在研究之外。使用改良的Cormack-Lehane(CL)评分系统对所有患者的喉镜视图进行评分和分组。所获得的测量包括舌头宽度、舌头的纵向横截面积、舌头体积、下颌骨-舌骨距离、舌骨-声门距离、下颌骨-舌骨-声门角、皮肤-甲状舌骨膜距离、甲状腺软骨的声门上缘距离(DGTC)、皮肤-舌骨距离,会厌位于皮肤距离的中间。方差分析和卡方分析用于比较各组之间的差异。Logistic回归用于识别困难喉镜检查的危险因素,并通过受试者操作特征曲线和列线图进行可视化。采用R 3.6.3版和SPSS 26.0版进行统计分析。结果:困难喉镜检查49例(CLⅢ-Ⅳ级),困难喉镜检查453例(CLⅠ-Ⅱ级)。超声测量的下颌舌骨-声门角和DGTC在两组之间有显著差异(p结论:下颌舌骨声门角小于125.5°或DGTC大于1.22cm的患者可能会出现困难的喉镜检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A quantitative study of airway ultrasound in predicting difficult laryngoscopy: A prospective study

Purpose

As common clinical screening tests cannot effectively predict a difficult airway, and unanticipated difficult laryngoscopy remains a challenge for physicians. We herein used ultrasound to develop some point-of-care predictors for difficult laryngoscopy.

Methods

This prospective observational study included 502 patients who underwent laryngoscopy and a detailed sonographic assessment. Patients under 18 years old, or with maxillofacial deformities or fractures, limited mouth opening, limited neck movement or history of neck surgery were excluded from the study. Laryngoscopic views of all patients were scored and grouping using the modified Cormack-Lehane (CL) scoring system. The measurements acquired comprised tongue width, the longitudinal cross-sectional area of the tongue, tongue volume, the mandible-hyoid bone distance, the hyoid bone-glottis distance, the mandible-hyoid bone-glottis angle, the skin-thyrohyoid membrane distance, the glottis-superior edge of the thyroid cartilage distance (DGTC), the skin-hyoid bone distance, and the epiglottis midway-skin distance. ANOVA and Chi-square were used to compare differences between groups. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for difficult laryngoscopy and it was visualized by receiver operating characteristic curves and nomogram. R version 3.6.3 and SPSS version 26.0 were used for statistical analyses.

Results

Difficult laryngoscopy was indicated in 49 patients (CL grade Ⅲ – Ⅳ) and easy laryngoscopy in 453 patients (CL grade Ⅰ – Ⅱ). The ultrasound-measured mandible-hyoid bone-glottis angle and DGTC significantly differed between the 2 groups (p < 0.001). Difficult laryngoscopy was predicted by an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.930 with a threshold mandible-hyoid bone-glottis angle of 125.5° and by an AUC of 0.722 with a threshold DGTC of 1.22 cm. The longitudinal cross-sectional area of the tongue, tongue width, tongue volume, the mandible-hyoid distance, and the hyoid-glottis distance did not significantly differ between the groups.

Conclusion

Difficult laryngoscopy may be anticipated in patients in whom the mandible-hyoid bone-glottis angle is smaller than 125.5° or DGTC is larger than 1.22 cm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1707
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Traumatology (CJT, ISSN 1008-1275) was launched in 1998 and is a peer-reviewed English journal authorized by Chinese Association of Trauma, Chinese Medical Association. It is multidisciplinary and designed to provide the most current and relevant information for both the clinical and basic research in the field of traumatic medicine. CJT primarily publishes expert forums, original papers, case reports and so on. Topics cover trauma system and management, surgical procedures, acute care, rehabilitation, post-traumatic complications, translational medicine, traffic medicine and other related areas. The journal especially emphasizes clinical application, technique, surgical video, guideline, recommendations for more effective surgical approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信