实施国家糖尿病预防计划的组织的可持续能力模式:潜在概况分析。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lillian Madrigal, Regine Haardörfer, Michelle C Kegler, Sarah Piper, Linelle M Blais, Mary Beth Weber, Cam Escoffery
{"title":"实施国家糖尿病预防计划的组织的可持续能力模式:潜在概况分析。","authors":"Lillian Madrigal, Regine Haardörfer, Michelle C Kegler, Sarah Piper, Linelle M Blais, Mary Beth Weber, Cam Escoffery","doi":"10.5888/pcd20.230067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Since the launch of the National Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) in 2010, more than 3,000 organizations have registered with the Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention to deliver the program; today, however, only approximately 2,000 organizations are registered, indicating challenges with sustainability. We used the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT) to explore patterns of sustainability capacity among National DPP delivery organizations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from a cross-sectional online survey conducted in August and September 2021 of staff members (N = 440) at National DPP delivery organizations. We conducted a latent profile analysis to identify latent subpopulations on the basis of respondent PSAT domain scores. Regression analyses were used to estimate associations between derived latent classes, PSAT scores, and respondent characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 4-class model included 4 groups of capacity for program sustainability, ranging from low to high: low (class 1) with 8.0% of the sample, medium-low (class 2) with 22.0%, medium-high (class 3) with 41.6%, and high (class 4) with 28.4%. Program evaluation (mean score = 5.1 [SD = 1.4]) and adaptation (mean score = 5.3 [SD = 1.3]) were the domains with the highest scores, while funding stability (mean score = 4.0 [SD = 1.6]) and Partnerships (mean score = 4.0 [SD = 1.7]) had the lowest scores. In our sample of National DPP delivery organizations, most reported relatively high capacity for program sustainability, and key indicators associated with sustainability capacity were virtual delivery, location of delivery, funding sources, and organization type.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Similar to sustainability capacity findings from other PSAT studies, our study found that funding stability and partnerships are areas to strengthen. This insight is useful in sustainability planning at organizational and national levels across multiple programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51273,"journal":{"name":"Preventing Chronic Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10599327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of Sustainability Capacity Among Organizations That Deliver the National Diabetes Prevention Program: A Latent Profile Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Lillian Madrigal, Regine Haardörfer, Michelle C Kegler, Sarah Piper, Linelle M Blais, Mary Beth Weber, Cam Escoffery\",\"doi\":\"10.5888/pcd20.230067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Since the launch of the National Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) in 2010, more than 3,000 organizations have registered with the Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention to deliver the program; today, however, only approximately 2,000 organizations are registered, indicating challenges with sustainability. We used the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT) to explore patterns of sustainability capacity among National DPP delivery organizations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from a cross-sectional online survey conducted in August and September 2021 of staff members (N = 440) at National DPP delivery organizations. We conducted a latent profile analysis to identify latent subpopulations on the basis of respondent PSAT domain scores. Regression analyses were used to estimate associations between derived latent classes, PSAT scores, and respondent characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 4-class model included 4 groups of capacity for program sustainability, ranging from low to high: low (class 1) with 8.0% of the sample, medium-low (class 2) with 22.0%, medium-high (class 3) with 41.6%, and high (class 4) with 28.4%. Program evaluation (mean score = 5.1 [SD = 1.4]) and adaptation (mean score = 5.3 [SD = 1.3]) were the domains with the highest scores, while funding stability (mean score = 4.0 [SD = 1.6]) and Partnerships (mean score = 4.0 [SD = 1.7]) had the lowest scores. In our sample of National DPP delivery organizations, most reported relatively high capacity for program sustainability, and key indicators associated with sustainability capacity were virtual delivery, location of delivery, funding sources, and organization type.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Similar to sustainability capacity findings from other PSAT studies, our study found that funding stability and partnerships are areas to strengthen. This insight is useful in sustainability planning at organizational and national levels across multiple programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventing Chronic Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10599327/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventing Chronic Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd20.230067\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventing Chronic Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd20.230067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:自2010年启动国家糖尿病预防计划(DPP)以来,已有3000多个组织在疾病控制和预防中心注册实施该计划;然而,如今只有大约2000个组织注册,这表明可持续性面临挑战。我们使用项目可持续性评估工具(PSAT)来探索国家DPP交付组织的可持续性能力模式。方法:我们使用了2021年8月和9月对国家DPP交付组织的工作人员(N=440)进行的横断面在线调查的数据。我们进行了一项潜在的概况分析,以确定潜在的亚群的基础上,受访者PSAT领域得分。回归分析用于估计衍生的潜在类别、PSAT分数和受访者特征之间的关联。结果:4类模型包括4组项目可持续性能力,从低到高:低(1类)占样本的8.0%,中低(2类)占22.0%,中高(3类)占41.6%,高(4类)占28.4%。项目评估(平均得分=5.1[SD=1.4])和适应(平均得分5.3[SD=1.3])是得分最高的领域,而资金稳定性(平均得分=4.0[SD=1.6])和伙伴关系(平均得分=4.0[SD=1.7])得分最低。在我们的国家DPP交付组织样本中,大多数组织报告了相对较高的项目可持续性能力,与可持续性能力相关的关键指标是虚拟交付、交付地点、资金来源和组织类型。讨论:与其他PSAT研究的可持续能力发现类似,我们的研究发现,资金稳定性和伙伴关系是需要加强的领域。这一见解在多个项目的组织和国家层面的可持续发展规划中非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Patterns of Sustainability Capacity Among Organizations That Deliver the National Diabetes Prevention Program: A Latent Profile Analysis.

Patterns of Sustainability Capacity Among Organizations That Deliver the National Diabetes Prevention Program: A Latent Profile Analysis.

Introduction: Since the launch of the National Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) in 2010, more than 3,000 organizations have registered with the Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention to deliver the program; today, however, only approximately 2,000 organizations are registered, indicating challenges with sustainability. We used the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT) to explore patterns of sustainability capacity among National DPP delivery organizations.

Methods: We used data from a cross-sectional online survey conducted in August and September 2021 of staff members (N = 440) at National DPP delivery organizations. We conducted a latent profile analysis to identify latent subpopulations on the basis of respondent PSAT domain scores. Regression analyses were used to estimate associations between derived latent classes, PSAT scores, and respondent characteristics.

Results: The 4-class model included 4 groups of capacity for program sustainability, ranging from low to high: low (class 1) with 8.0% of the sample, medium-low (class 2) with 22.0%, medium-high (class 3) with 41.6%, and high (class 4) with 28.4%. Program evaluation (mean score = 5.1 [SD = 1.4]) and adaptation (mean score = 5.3 [SD = 1.3]) were the domains with the highest scores, while funding stability (mean score = 4.0 [SD = 1.6]) and Partnerships (mean score = 4.0 [SD = 1.7]) had the lowest scores. In our sample of National DPP delivery organizations, most reported relatively high capacity for program sustainability, and key indicators associated with sustainability capacity were virtual delivery, location of delivery, funding sources, and organization type.

Discussion: Similar to sustainability capacity findings from other PSAT studies, our study found that funding stability and partnerships are areas to strengthen. This insight is useful in sustainability planning at organizational and national levels across multiple programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Preventing Chronic Disease
Preventing Chronic Disease PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Preventing Chronic Disease (PCD) is a peer-reviewed electronic journal established by the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. The mission of PCD is to promote the open exchange of information and knowledge among researchers, practitioners, policy makers, and others who strive to improve the health of the public through chronic disease prevention. The vision of PCD is to be the premier forum where practitioners and policy makers inform research and researchers help practitioners and policy makers more effectively improve the health of the population. Articles focus on preventing and controlling chronic diseases and conditions, promoting health, and examining the biological, behavioral, physical, and social determinants of health and their impact on quality of life, morbidity, and mortality across the life span.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信