大型学术医疗机构限制性抗肿瘤药物的住院治疗结果。

Q1 Medicine
P and T Pub Date : 2019-08-01
Kimberly M Lau, Katrina Derry, Ashley Dalton, Janine Martino
{"title":"大型学术医疗机构限制性抗肿瘤药物的住院治疗结果。","authors":"Kimberly M Lau,&nbsp;Katrina Derry,&nbsp;Ashley Dalton,&nbsp;Janine Martino","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Restricting oncology and hematology medications to outpatient infusion centers may be considered when infrequent administration is required, a low risk of serious adverse effects exists, or when prompt amelioration of a condition is not expected. At the University of California, San Diego (UCSD), we created a new formulary status for medications designated \"formulary, outpatient-restricted use only.\" This designation could optimize payer reimbursement, as well as improve patient comfort, by negating the need for inpatient admission. When the inpatient administration of a restricted medication is requested at UCSD, there ensues a loosely defined review process involving an informal conversation between the requesting prescriber and the oncology pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) chair. Patient outcomes associated with this formulary status and informal request process are limited. The purpose of this study is to describe the use of formulary, outpatient-restricted oncology and hematology medications in the inpatient setting at a single-center, academic, and comprehensive cancer center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted between January 1, 2015 and May 1, 2017. The primary outcome was to determine the percentage of formulary, outpatient-restricted oncology or hematology medications that were administered in the inpatient setting and continued to the outpatient setting. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, hospice enrollment, disease progression status, level of evidence supporting the medication usage, and cost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients and 24 outpatient-restricted medications met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen (54%) medications were continued upon discharge and eight (33%) were not continued in the outpatient setting. Five of those eight medications were discontinued as a result of patient death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this single-center study, approximately one-third of the outpatient-restricted medications were not continued upon discharge. The findings suggest that our informal approval process could result in the suboptimal use of formulary outpatient-restricted medications for oncology and hematology indications. A more formalized request process might lead to the more effective utilization of these medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":38773,"journal":{"name":"P and T","volume":"44 8","pages":"481-496"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679954/pdf/ptj4408481.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Inpatient Administration of Restricted Antineoplastic Medications at a Large Academic Medical Institution.\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly M Lau,&nbsp;Katrina Derry,&nbsp;Ashley Dalton,&nbsp;Janine Martino\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Restricting oncology and hematology medications to outpatient infusion centers may be considered when infrequent administration is required, a low risk of serious adverse effects exists, or when prompt amelioration of a condition is not expected. At the University of California, San Diego (UCSD), we created a new formulary status for medications designated \\\"formulary, outpatient-restricted use only.\\\" This designation could optimize payer reimbursement, as well as improve patient comfort, by negating the need for inpatient admission. When the inpatient administration of a restricted medication is requested at UCSD, there ensues a loosely defined review process involving an informal conversation between the requesting prescriber and the oncology pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) chair. Patient outcomes associated with this formulary status and informal request process are limited. The purpose of this study is to describe the use of formulary, outpatient-restricted oncology and hematology medications in the inpatient setting at a single-center, academic, and comprehensive cancer center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted between January 1, 2015 and May 1, 2017. The primary outcome was to determine the percentage of formulary, outpatient-restricted oncology or hematology medications that were administered in the inpatient setting and continued to the outpatient setting. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, hospice enrollment, disease progression status, level of evidence supporting the medication usage, and cost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients and 24 outpatient-restricted medications met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen (54%) medications were continued upon discharge and eight (33%) were not continued in the outpatient setting. Five of those eight medications were discontinued as a result of patient death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this single-center study, approximately one-third of the outpatient-restricted medications were not continued upon discharge. The findings suggest that our informal approval process could result in the suboptimal use of formulary outpatient-restricted medications for oncology and hematology indications. A more formalized request process might lead to the more effective utilization of these medications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"P and T\",\"volume\":\"44 8\",\"pages\":\"481-496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679954/pdf/ptj4408481.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"P and T\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"P and T","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当需要不频繁给药、存在严重不良反应的低风险或不希望病情迅速好转时,可以考虑将肿瘤学和血液学药物限制在门诊输液中心。在加州大学圣地亚哥分校(UCSD),我们为药物创建了一个新的处方库状态,指定为“处方库,仅限门诊使用”。这一指定可以通过取消住院需求来优化付款人报销,并提高患者的舒适度。当加州大学圣地亚哥分校要求住院患者服用限制性药物时,随后会有一个定义松散的审查过程,包括提出请求的处方医生与肿瘤药房和治疗学(P&T)主席之间的非正式对话。与这种处方状态和非正式请求过程相关的患者结果是有限的。本研究的目的是描述在单中心、学术中心和综合癌症中心的住院患者中,处方、门诊限制性肿瘤学和血液学药物的使用。方法:在2015年1月1日至2017年5月1日期间进行回顾性图表审查。主要结果是确定在住院环境中服用并持续到门诊环境的处方、门诊限制性肿瘤学或血液学药物的百分比。次要结果包括总生存率、临终关怀登记、疾病进展状况、支持药物使用的证据水平和费用。结果:23名患者和24名门诊限制性药物符合纳入标准。13种(54%)药物在出院后继续使用,8种(33%)药物在门诊环境中未继续使用。这八种药物中有五种因患者死亡而停用。结论:在这项单中心研究中,大约三分之一的门诊限制性药物在出院后没有继续使用。研究结果表明,我们的非正式审批程序可能会导致处方门诊限制性药物在肿瘤学和血液学适应症方面的使用不理想。更正式的申请流程可能会使这些药物得到更有效的利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Outcomes of Inpatient Administration of Restricted Antineoplastic Medications at a Large Academic Medical Institution.

Outcomes of Inpatient Administration of Restricted Antineoplastic Medications at a Large Academic Medical Institution.

Background: Restricting oncology and hematology medications to outpatient infusion centers may be considered when infrequent administration is required, a low risk of serious adverse effects exists, or when prompt amelioration of a condition is not expected. At the University of California, San Diego (UCSD), we created a new formulary status for medications designated "formulary, outpatient-restricted use only." This designation could optimize payer reimbursement, as well as improve patient comfort, by negating the need for inpatient admission. When the inpatient administration of a restricted medication is requested at UCSD, there ensues a loosely defined review process involving an informal conversation between the requesting prescriber and the oncology pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) chair. Patient outcomes associated with this formulary status and informal request process are limited. The purpose of this study is to describe the use of formulary, outpatient-restricted oncology and hematology medications in the inpatient setting at a single-center, academic, and comprehensive cancer center.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted between January 1, 2015 and May 1, 2017. The primary outcome was to determine the percentage of formulary, outpatient-restricted oncology or hematology medications that were administered in the inpatient setting and continued to the outpatient setting. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, hospice enrollment, disease progression status, level of evidence supporting the medication usage, and cost.

Results: Twenty-three patients and 24 outpatient-restricted medications met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen (54%) medications were continued upon discharge and eight (33%) were not continued in the outpatient setting. Five of those eight medications were discontinued as a result of patient death.

Conclusion: In this single-center study, approximately one-third of the outpatient-restricted medications were not continued upon discharge. The findings suggest that our informal approval process could result in the suboptimal use of formulary outpatient-restricted medications for oncology and hematology indications. A more formalized request process might lead to the more effective utilization of these medications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
P and T
P and T Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信