{"title":"重金属与含有半胱氨酸的卷曲螺旋肽结合的差异。","authors":"Prianka Luther, Aimee L. Boyle","doi":"10.1002/psc.3549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>One third of all structurally characterised proteins contain a metal; however, the interplay between metal-binding and peptide/protein folding has yet to be fully elucidated. To better understand how metal binding affects peptide folding, a range of metals should be studied within a specific scaffold. To this end, we modified a histidine-containing coiled-coil peptide to create a cysteine-containing scaffold, named CX3C, which was designed to bind heavy metal ions. In addition, we generated a peptide named CX2C, which contains a binding site more commonly found in natural proteins. Using a combination of analytical techniques including circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, UV–Vis spectroscopy and size-exclusion chromatography coupled to multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS), we examined the differences in the metal-binding properties of the two peptides. Both peptides are largely unfolded in the apo state due to the disruption of the hydrophobic core by inclusion of the polar cysteine residues. However, this unfolding is overcome by the addition of Cd(II), Pb(II) and Hg(II), and helical assemblies are formed. Both peptides have differing affinities for these metal ions, a fact likely attributed to the differing sizes of the ions. We also show that the oligomerisation state of the peptide complexes and the coordination geometries of the metal ions differ between the two peptide scaffolds. These findings highlight that subtle changes in the primary structure of a peptide can have considerable implications for metal binding.</p>","PeriodicalId":16946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Peptide Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psc.3549","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in heavy metal binding to cysteine-containing coiled-coil peptides\",\"authors\":\"Prianka Luther, Aimee L. Boyle\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/psc.3549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>One third of all structurally characterised proteins contain a metal; however, the interplay between metal-binding and peptide/protein folding has yet to be fully elucidated. To better understand how metal binding affects peptide folding, a range of metals should be studied within a specific scaffold. To this end, we modified a histidine-containing coiled-coil peptide to create a cysteine-containing scaffold, named CX3C, which was designed to bind heavy metal ions. In addition, we generated a peptide named CX2C, which contains a binding site more commonly found in natural proteins. Using a combination of analytical techniques including circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, UV–Vis spectroscopy and size-exclusion chromatography coupled to multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS), we examined the differences in the metal-binding properties of the two peptides. Both peptides are largely unfolded in the apo state due to the disruption of the hydrophobic core by inclusion of the polar cysteine residues. However, this unfolding is overcome by the addition of Cd(II), Pb(II) and Hg(II), and helical assemblies are formed. Both peptides have differing affinities for these metal ions, a fact likely attributed to the differing sizes of the ions. We also show that the oligomerisation state of the peptide complexes and the coordination geometries of the metal ions differ between the two peptide scaffolds. These findings highlight that subtle changes in the primary structure of a peptide can have considerable implications for metal binding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Peptide Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psc.3549\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Peptide Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psc.3549\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Peptide Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psc.3549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differences in heavy metal binding to cysteine-containing coiled-coil peptides
One third of all structurally characterised proteins contain a metal; however, the interplay between metal-binding and peptide/protein folding has yet to be fully elucidated. To better understand how metal binding affects peptide folding, a range of metals should be studied within a specific scaffold. To this end, we modified a histidine-containing coiled-coil peptide to create a cysteine-containing scaffold, named CX3C, which was designed to bind heavy metal ions. In addition, we generated a peptide named CX2C, which contains a binding site more commonly found in natural proteins. Using a combination of analytical techniques including circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, UV–Vis spectroscopy and size-exclusion chromatography coupled to multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS), we examined the differences in the metal-binding properties of the two peptides. Both peptides are largely unfolded in the apo state due to the disruption of the hydrophobic core by inclusion of the polar cysteine residues. However, this unfolding is overcome by the addition of Cd(II), Pb(II) and Hg(II), and helical assemblies are formed. Both peptides have differing affinities for these metal ions, a fact likely attributed to the differing sizes of the ions. We also show that the oligomerisation state of the peptide complexes and the coordination geometries of the metal ions differ between the two peptide scaffolds. These findings highlight that subtle changes in the primary structure of a peptide can have considerable implications for metal binding.
期刊介绍:
The official Journal of the European Peptide Society EPS
The Journal of Peptide Science is a cooperative venture of John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and the European Peptide Society, undertaken for the advancement of international peptide science by the publication of original research results and reviews. The Journal of Peptide Science publishes three types of articles: Research Articles, Rapid Communications and Reviews.
The scope of the Journal embraces the whole range of peptide chemistry and biology: the isolation, characterisation, synthesis properties (chemical, physical, conformational, pharmacological, endocrine and immunological) and applications of natural peptides; studies of their analogues, including peptidomimetics; peptide antibiotics and other peptide-derived complex natural products; peptide and peptide-related drug design and development; peptide materials and nanomaterials science; combinatorial peptide research; the chemical synthesis of proteins; and methodological advances in all these areas. The spectrum of interests is well illustrated by the published proceedings of the regular international Symposia of the European, American, Japanese, Australian, Chinese and Indian Peptide Societies.