脚趾并指修复后瘢痕疙瘩形成的主要危险因素是什么?

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Tatsuya Ishigaki , Shinsuke Akita , Akikazu Udagawa , Hiroyuki Suzuki , Nobuyuki Mitsukawa
{"title":"脚趾并指修复后瘢痕疙瘩形成的主要危险因素是什么?","authors":"Tatsuya Ishigaki ,&nbsp;Shinsuke Akita ,&nbsp;Akikazu Udagawa ,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Suzuki ,&nbsp;Nobuyuki Mitsukawa","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2023.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div><span>Keloid formation in </span>toes<span> area is rare. However, occurrence of this phenomenon in toes after the surgery of syndactyly repair has been reported. Risk factors of keloid formation in toes after syndactyly reconstructions are currently unknown. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of keloid formation after the surgery of syndactyly repair of the toes.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed our case series including patients who were treated surgically at our institution. We hypothesized some key factors of keloid formation and analyzed each of them statistically.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 105 patients were treated surgically at our hospital, and 9 patients were involved keloid formations after operations. Among our hypothesized key factors, the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the number of affected web spaces (OR 0.031; 95%CI 0.001–0.684; p = 0.028) was significantly different. Digital enlargement was not a significant factor (OR 17.731; 95%CI 0.686–458.174; p = 0.091).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Involving multiple web space was associated with keloid formation after syndactyly release, on the other hand, toe enlargement did not show a significant difference. However, the digital enlargement showed high Odds ratio, we could not deny its high relativity for keloid formation. Further investigations are needed to clarify the key risk factors of keloid formation after the surgery of syndactyly repair of the toes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":"29 6","pages":"Pages 1406-1410"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What are the key risk factors of keloid formation after repair of syndactyly of the toe?\",\"authors\":\"Tatsuya Ishigaki ,&nbsp;Shinsuke Akita ,&nbsp;Akikazu Udagawa ,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Suzuki ,&nbsp;Nobuyuki Mitsukawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jos.2023.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div><span>Keloid formation in </span>toes<span> area is rare. However, occurrence of this phenomenon in toes after the surgery of syndactyly repair has been reported. Risk factors of keloid formation in toes after syndactyly reconstructions are currently unknown. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of keloid formation after the surgery of syndactyly repair of the toes.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed our case series including patients who were treated surgically at our institution. We hypothesized some key factors of keloid formation and analyzed each of them statistically.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 105 patients were treated surgically at our hospital, and 9 patients were involved keloid formations after operations. Among our hypothesized key factors, the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the number of affected web spaces (OR 0.031; 95%CI 0.001–0.684; p = 0.028) was significantly different. Digital enlargement was not a significant factor (OR 17.731; 95%CI 0.686–458.174; p = 0.091).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Involving multiple web space was associated with keloid formation after syndactyly release, on the other hand, toe enlargement did not show a significant difference. However, the digital enlargement showed high Odds ratio, we could not deny its high relativity for keloid formation. Further investigations are needed to clarify the key risk factors of keloid formation after the surgery of syndactyly repair of the toes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"volume\":\"29 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1406-1410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0949265823002701\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0949265823002701","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:足趾区瘢痕疙瘩的形成非常罕见。然而,这种现象在趾并指修复术后脚趾中的发生已有报道。趾并指重建术后脚趾瘢痕疙瘩形成的危险因素目前尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨脚趾并指修复术后瘢痕疙瘩形成的危险因素。方法:我们回顾性分析了我们的病例系列,包括在我们机构接受手术治疗的患者。我们假设了瘢痕疙瘩形成的一些关键因素,并对每一个因素进行了统计分析。结果:我院共手术治疗105例,术后瘢痕疙瘩形成9例。在我们假设的关键因素中,多变量逻辑回归分析的结果显示,受影响的网络空间数量(OR 0.031;95%CI 0.001-0.684;p=0.028)存在显著差异。趾增大不是显著因素(OR 17.731;95%CI 0.686-458.174;p=0.091)。但数字放大显示出较高的比值比,不能否认其与瘢痕疙瘩形成的高度相关性。需要进一步的研究来阐明脚趾并指修复术后瘢痕疙瘩形成的关键风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What are the key risk factors of keloid formation after repair of syndactyly of the toe?

Purpose

Keloid formation in toes area is rare. However, occurrence of this phenomenon in toes after the surgery of syndactyly repair has been reported. Risk factors of keloid formation in toes after syndactyly reconstructions are currently unknown. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of keloid formation after the surgery of syndactyly repair of the toes.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed our case series including patients who were treated surgically at our institution. We hypothesized some key factors of keloid formation and analyzed each of them statistically.

Results

A total of 105 patients were treated surgically at our hospital, and 9 patients were involved keloid formations after operations. Among our hypothesized key factors, the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the number of affected web spaces (OR 0.031; 95%CI 0.001–0.684; p = 0.028) was significantly different. Digital enlargement was not a significant factor (OR 17.731; 95%CI 0.686–458.174; p = 0.091).

Conclusion

Involving multiple web space was associated with keloid formation after syndactyly release, on the other hand, toe enlargement did not show a significant difference. However, the digital enlargement showed high Odds ratio, we could not deny its high relativity for keloid formation. Further investigations are needed to clarify the key risk factors of keloid formation after the surgery of syndactyly repair of the toes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信