大鼠颈挫伤和脊髓牵张损伤后的行走功能。

Journal of Experimental Neuroscience Pub Date : 2019-08-19 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179069519869615
Yue Guo, Hai Hu, Jingchao Wang, Meiyan Zhang, Kinon Chen
{"title":"大鼠颈挫伤和脊髓牵张损伤后的行走功能。","authors":"Yue Guo,&nbsp;Hai Hu,&nbsp;Jingchao Wang,&nbsp;Meiyan Zhang,&nbsp;Kinon Chen","doi":"10.1177/1179069519869615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines and compares the walking function in contusion and distraction spinal cord injury (SCI) mechanisms. Moderate contusion and distraction SCIs were surgically induced between C5 and C6 in Sprague-Dawley male rats. The CatWalk system was used to perform gait analysis of walkway walking. The ladder rung walking test was used to quantify skilled locomotor movements of ladder rung walking. It was found that the inter-paw coordination, paw support, front paw kinematics, hind paw kinematics, and skilled movements were significantly different before and after contusion and distraction. Step sequence duration, diagonal support, forelimb intensity, forelimb duty cycle, forelimb paw angle, and forelimb swing speed were more greatly affected in distraction than in contusion at 2 weeks post-injury, whereas hindlimb stand was more greatly affected in contusion than in distraction at 8 weeks post-injury. After 8 weeks post-injury, diagonal coupling-variation, girdle coupling-variation, ipsilateral coupling-mean, forelimb maximum contact at, forelimb intensity, forelimb paw angle, and number of forelimb misplacements recovered to normal in contusion but not in distraction, whereas step sequence duration, ipsilateral coupling-variation, forelimb stand, forelimb duty cycle, hindlimb swing duration, hindlimb swing speed, and number of forelimb slips recovered to normal in distraction but not in contusion. Some of the behavioral outcomes, but not the others, were linearly correlated with the histological outcomes. In conclusion, walking deficits and recovery can be affected by the type of common traumatic SCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":15817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Neuroscience","volume":"13 ","pages":"1179069519869615"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179069519869615","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Walking Function After Cervical Contusion and Distraction Spinal Cord Injuries in Rats.\",\"authors\":\"Yue Guo,&nbsp;Hai Hu,&nbsp;Jingchao Wang,&nbsp;Meiyan Zhang,&nbsp;Kinon Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1179069519869615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examines and compares the walking function in contusion and distraction spinal cord injury (SCI) mechanisms. Moderate contusion and distraction SCIs were surgically induced between C5 and C6 in Sprague-Dawley male rats. The CatWalk system was used to perform gait analysis of walkway walking. The ladder rung walking test was used to quantify skilled locomotor movements of ladder rung walking. It was found that the inter-paw coordination, paw support, front paw kinematics, hind paw kinematics, and skilled movements were significantly different before and after contusion and distraction. Step sequence duration, diagonal support, forelimb intensity, forelimb duty cycle, forelimb paw angle, and forelimb swing speed were more greatly affected in distraction than in contusion at 2 weeks post-injury, whereas hindlimb stand was more greatly affected in contusion than in distraction at 8 weeks post-injury. After 8 weeks post-injury, diagonal coupling-variation, girdle coupling-variation, ipsilateral coupling-mean, forelimb maximum contact at, forelimb intensity, forelimb paw angle, and number of forelimb misplacements recovered to normal in contusion but not in distraction, whereas step sequence duration, ipsilateral coupling-variation, forelimb stand, forelimb duty cycle, hindlimb swing duration, hindlimb swing speed, and number of forelimb slips recovered to normal in distraction but not in contusion. Some of the behavioral outcomes, but not the others, were linearly correlated with the histological outcomes. In conclusion, walking deficits and recovery can be affected by the type of common traumatic SCI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1179069519869615\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179069519869615\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179069519869615\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179069519869615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

本研究检测并比较了挫伤和牵张性脊髓损伤(SCI)机制中的行走功能。在Sprague-Dawley雄性大鼠的C5和C6之间通过手术诱导中度挫伤和牵张SCIs。CatWalk系统用于对人行道行走进行步态分析。阶梯行走测试用于量化阶梯行走的熟练运动。研究发现,挫伤和牵张前后爪间协调、爪支撑、前爪运动学、后爪运动学和熟练动作有显著差异。步序持续时间、对角支撑、前肢强度、前肢占空比、前肢爪角和前肢摆动速度在2 损伤后数周,而在8岁时,挫伤对后肢站立的影响比分心更大 受伤后数周。8点之后 损伤后数周、对角线耦合变化、腰带耦合变化、同侧耦合平均值、前肢最大接触点、前肢强度、前肢爪角和前肢错位次数在挫伤中恢复到正常,但在牵张中没有恢复,而步序持续时间、同侧联合变化、前肢站立、前肢工作周期、后肢摆动持续时间,后肢摆动速度和前肢滑动次数在牵张中恢复到正常但在挫伤中没有恢复。一些行为结果与组织学结果呈线性相关,但其他结果则不然。总之,行走缺陷和恢复可能受到常见创伤性SCI类型的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Walking Function After Cervical Contusion and Distraction Spinal Cord Injuries in Rats.

Walking Function After Cervical Contusion and Distraction Spinal Cord Injuries in Rats.

Walking Function After Cervical Contusion and Distraction Spinal Cord Injuries in Rats.

Walking Function After Cervical Contusion and Distraction Spinal Cord Injuries in Rats.

This study examines and compares the walking function in contusion and distraction spinal cord injury (SCI) mechanisms. Moderate contusion and distraction SCIs were surgically induced between C5 and C6 in Sprague-Dawley male rats. The CatWalk system was used to perform gait analysis of walkway walking. The ladder rung walking test was used to quantify skilled locomotor movements of ladder rung walking. It was found that the inter-paw coordination, paw support, front paw kinematics, hind paw kinematics, and skilled movements were significantly different before and after contusion and distraction. Step sequence duration, diagonal support, forelimb intensity, forelimb duty cycle, forelimb paw angle, and forelimb swing speed were more greatly affected in distraction than in contusion at 2 weeks post-injury, whereas hindlimb stand was more greatly affected in contusion than in distraction at 8 weeks post-injury. After 8 weeks post-injury, diagonal coupling-variation, girdle coupling-variation, ipsilateral coupling-mean, forelimb maximum contact at, forelimb intensity, forelimb paw angle, and number of forelimb misplacements recovered to normal in contusion but not in distraction, whereas step sequence duration, ipsilateral coupling-variation, forelimb stand, forelimb duty cycle, hindlimb swing duration, hindlimb swing speed, and number of forelimb slips recovered to normal in distraction but not in contusion. Some of the behavioral outcomes, but not the others, were linearly correlated with the histological outcomes. In conclusion, walking deficits and recovery can be affected by the type of common traumatic SCI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信