中枢神经系统试验中的创新技术:招募、保留和代表性的前景和陷阱。

Q3 Medicine
Innovations in clinical neuroscience Pub Date : 2023-09-01 eCollection Date: 2023-07-01
Jacqueline Lutz, Abhishek Pratap, Eric J Lenze, Durga Bestha, Jessica M Lipschitz, Stella Karantzoulis, Uma Vaidyanathan, Jessica Robin, William Horan, Stephen Brannan, Aurelia Mittoux, Michael C Davis, Shaheen E Lakhan, Richard Keefe
{"title":"中枢神经系统试验中的创新技术:招募、保留和代表性的前景和陷阱。","authors":"Jacqueline Lutz, Abhishek Pratap, Eric J Lenze, Durga Bestha, Jessica M Lipschitz, Stella Karantzoulis, Uma Vaidyanathan, Jessica Robin, William Horan, Stephen Brannan, Aurelia Mittoux, Michael C Davis, Shaheen E Lakhan, Richard Keefe","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recruitment of a sufficiently large and representative patient sample and its retention during central nervous system (CNS) trials presents major challenges for study sponsors. Technological advances are reshaping clinical trial operations to meet these challenges, and the COVID-19 pandemic further accelerated this development.</p><p><strong>Method of research: </strong>The International Society for CNS Clinical Trials and Methodology (ISCTM; www.isctm.org) Innovative Technologies for CNS Trials Working Group surveyed the state of technological innovations for improved recruitment and retention and assessed their promises and pitfalls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Online advertisement and electronic patient registries can enhance recruitment, but challenges with sample representativeness, conversion rates from eligible prescreening to enrolled patients, data privacy and security, and patient identification remain hurdles for optimal use of these technologies. Electronic medical records (EMR) mining with artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) methods is promising but awaits translation into trials. During the study treatment phase, technological innovations increasingly support participant retention, including adherence with the investigational treatment. Digital tools for adherence and retention support take many forms, including patient-centric communication channels between researchers and participants, real-time study reminders, and digital behavioral interventions to increase study compliance. However, such tools add technical complexities to trials, and their impact on the generalizability of results are largely unknown.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the group found a scarcity of systematic data directly assessing the impact of technological innovations on study recruitment and retention in CNS trials, even for strategies with already high adoption, such as online recruitment. Given the added complexity and costs associated with most technological innovations, such data is needed to fully harness technologies for CNS trials and drive further adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":13635,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in clinical neuroscience","volume":"20 7-9","pages":"40-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10561984/pdf/icns_20_7-9_40.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovative Technologies in CNS Trials: Promises and Pitfalls for Recruitment, Retention, and Representativeness.\",\"authors\":\"Jacqueline Lutz, Abhishek Pratap, Eric J Lenze, Durga Bestha, Jessica M Lipschitz, Stella Karantzoulis, Uma Vaidyanathan, Jessica Robin, William Horan, Stephen Brannan, Aurelia Mittoux, Michael C Davis, Shaheen E Lakhan, Richard Keefe\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recruitment of a sufficiently large and representative patient sample and its retention during central nervous system (CNS) trials presents major challenges for study sponsors. Technological advances are reshaping clinical trial operations to meet these challenges, and the COVID-19 pandemic further accelerated this development.</p><p><strong>Method of research: </strong>The International Society for CNS Clinical Trials and Methodology (ISCTM; www.isctm.org) Innovative Technologies for CNS Trials Working Group surveyed the state of technological innovations for improved recruitment and retention and assessed their promises and pitfalls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Online advertisement and electronic patient registries can enhance recruitment, but challenges with sample representativeness, conversion rates from eligible prescreening to enrolled patients, data privacy and security, and patient identification remain hurdles for optimal use of these technologies. Electronic medical records (EMR) mining with artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) methods is promising but awaits translation into trials. During the study treatment phase, technological innovations increasingly support participant retention, including adherence with the investigational treatment. Digital tools for adherence and retention support take many forms, including patient-centric communication channels between researchers and participants, real-time study reminders, and digital behavioral interventions to increase study compliance. However, such tools add technical complexities to trials, and their impact on the generalizability of results are largely unknown.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the group found a scarcity of systematic data directly assessing the impact of technological innovations on study recruitment and retention in CNS trials, even for strategies with already high adoption, such as online recruitment. Given the added complexity and costs associated with most technological innovations, such data is needed to fully harness technologies for CNS trials and drive further adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovations in clinical neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"20 7-9\",\"pages\":\"40-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10561984/pdf/icns_20_7-9_40.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovations in clinical neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in clinical neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:招募足够大且具有代表性的患者样本及其在中枢神经系统(CNS)试验中的保留对研究发起人来说是一个重大挑战。技术进步正在重塑临床试验操作以应对这些挑战,新冠肺炎大流行进一步加速了这一发展。研究方法:国际中枢神经系统临床试验与方法学会(ISCTM;www.ISCTM.org)中枢神经系统试验创新技术工作组调查了技术创新的现状,以提高招募和保留率,并评估了其前景和陷阱。结果:在线广告和电子患者登记可以增强招募,但样本代表性、从符合条件的预筛选到登记患者的转化率、数据隐私和安全以及患者识别等方面的挑战仍然是这些技术最佳使用的障碍。利用人工智能(AI)/机器学习(ML)方法挖掘电子病历(EMR)是有前景的,但仍有待转化为试验。在研究治疗阶段,技术创新越来越多地支持参与者的保留,包括坚持研究治疗。用于依从性和保留支持的数字工具有多种形式,包括研究人员和参与者之间以患者为中心的沟通渠道、实时研究提醒以及提高研究依从性的数字行为干预。然而,这些工具增加了试验的技术复杂性,它们对结果可推广性的影响在很大程度上是未知的。结论:总的来说,该小组发现,即使对于已经高度采用的策略,如在线招募,也缺乏直接评估技术创新对中枢神经系统试验中研究招募和保留的影响的系统数据。考虑到大多数技术创新带来的复杂性和成本增加,需要这些数据来充分利用CNS试验技术并推动进一步采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Innovative Technologies in CNS Trials: Promises and Pitfalls for Recruitment, Retention, and Representativeness.

Objective: Recruitment of a sufficiently large and representative patient sample and its retention during central nervous system (CNS) trials presents major challenges for study sponsors. Technological advances are reshaping clinical trial operations to meet these challenges, and the COVID-19 pandemic further accelerated this development.

Method of research: The International Society for CNS Clinical Trials and Methodology (ISCTM; www.isctm.org) Innovative Technologies for CNS Trials Working Group surveyed the state of technological innovations for improved recruitment and retention and assessed their promises and pitfalls.

Results: Online advertisement and electronic patient registries can enhance recruitment, but challenges with sample representativeness, conversion rates from eligible prescreening to enrolled patients, data privacy and security, and patient identification remain hurdles for optimal use of these technologies. Electronic medical records (EMR) mining with artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) methods is promising but awaits translation into trials. During the study treatment phase, technological innovations increasingly support participant retention, including adherence with the investigational treatment. Digital tools for adherence and retention support take many forms, including patient-centric communication channels between researchers and participants, real-time study reminders, and digital behavioral interventions to increase study compliance. However, such tools add technical complexities to trials, and their impact on the generalizability of results are largely unknown.

Conclusion: Overall, the group found a scarcity of systematic data directly assessing the impact of technological innovations on study recruitment and retention in CNS trials, even for strategies with already high adoption, such as online recruitment. Given the added complexity and costs associated with most technological innovations, such data is needed to fully harness technologies for CNS trials and drive further adoption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovations in clinical neuroscience
Innovations in clinical neuroscience Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信