炎症性肠病患者接受家庭和办公室生物输液治疗的不良事件和依从性。

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Christopher J Schmoyer, Kelly Sun, Jeremy Zack, Priyanka Kumar, Raina Shivashankar
{"title":"炎症性肠病患者接受家庭和办公室生物输液治疗的不良事件和依从性。","authors":"Christopher J Schmoyer, Kelly Sun, Jeremy Zack, Priyanka Kumar, Raina Shivashankar","doi":"10.1093/ibd/izad226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biologic medications are a common therapy for those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). There are limited data on the outcomes of home-based biologic infusions for patients with IBD. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of biologic infusions for IBD patients who receive either home- or office-based administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients receiving infliximab or vedolizumab were analyzed retrospectively over a period of 152 weeks. Survival free of major adverse events including delayed infusion reaction, steroid initiation, drug discontinuation, or IBD-related emergency department visits, admission, and surgery were compared using a Kaplan-Meier curve. Individual adverse events, infusion-.related quality measures, and markers of patient adherence were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adverse event-free survival was greater among those receiving home-based infusion (n = 154) compared with office-based infusion (n = 133). The office infusion cohort had higher rates of delayed infusion reactions (4 vs 0), IBD-related surgery (6 vs 0), and drug discontinuation (44 vs 35); this was a sicker cohort of patients compared with those in the home infusion group. Home infusion patients were less likely to receive correct weight-based dosing for infliximab (71.7% vs 89.3%), obtain labs for drug monitoring (53.2% vs 71.4%), and adhere to routine clinic visits (37.9% vs 58.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The home-based infusion of biologics for IBD appears safe with lower rates of major adverse events compared with office-based infusions. However, those receiving home infusion were less likely to receive correct weight-based dosing for infliximab and were poorly adherent to routine follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":13623,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse Events and Compliance Among Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Treated With Home- vs Office-Based Biologic Infusions.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher J Schmoyer, Kelly Sun, Jeremy Zack, Priyanka Kumar, Raina Shivashankar\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ibd/izad226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biologic medications are a common therapy for those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). There are limited data on the outcomes of home-based biologic infusions for patients with IBD. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of biologic infusions for IBD patients who receive either home- or office-based administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients receiving infliximab or vedolizumab were analyzed retrospectively over a period of 152 weeks. Survival free of major adverse events including delayed infusion reaction, steroid initiation, drug discontinuation, or IBD-related emergency department visits, admission, and surgery were compared using a Kaplan-Meier curve. Individual adverse events, infusion-.related quality measures, and markers of patient adherence were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adverse event-free survival was greater among those receiving home-based infusion (n = 154) compared with office-based infusion (n = 133). The office infusion cohort had higher rates of delayed infusion reactions (4 vs 0), IBD-related surgery (6 vs 0), and drug discontinuation (44 vs 35); this was a sicker cohort of patients compared with those in the home infusion group. Home infusion patients were less likely to receive correct weight-based dosing for infliximab (71.7% vs 89.3%), obtain labs for drug monitoring (53.2% vs 71.4%), and adhere to routine clinic visits (37.9% vs 58.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The home-based infusion of biologics for IBD appears safe with lower rates of major adverse events compared with office-based infusions. However, those receiving home infusion were less likely to receive correct weight-based dosing for infliximab and were poorly adherent to routine follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izad226\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izad226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生物药物是治疗炎症性肠病(IBD)的常用药物。关于IBD患者在家进行生物输注的结果数据有限。本研究的目的是比较接受家庭或办公室给药的IBD患者生物输注的安全性和有效性。方法:对152周内接受英夫利昔单抗或韦多利珠单抗治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线比较无主要不良事件(包括延迟输注反应、类固醇开始、停药或IBD相关急诊就诊、入院和手术)的生存率。分析了个别不良事件、输液相关质量指标和患者依从性标志物。结果:接受家庭输液的患者无不良事件生存率较高(n = 154)与基于办公室的输液(n = 133)。办公室输液队列的延迟输液反应发生率(4比0)、IBD相关手术发生率(6比0)和停药发生率(44比35)较高;与家庭输液组相比,这是一组病情更严重的患者。在家输液的患者不太可能接受基于体重的英夫利昔单抗正确给药(71.7%对89.3%),不太可能获得药物监测实验室(53.2%对71.4%),也不太可能坚持常规门诊(37.9%对58.1%)。结论:与在办公室输液相比,在家输液治疗IBD的生物制剂似乎是安全的,主要不良事件发生率较低。然而,接受家庭输注的患者不太可能接受基于体重的英夫利昔单抗正确给药,并且对常规随访的依从性较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adverse Events and Compliance Among Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Treated With Home- vs Office-Based Biologic Infusions.

Background: Biologic medications are a common therapy for those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). There are limited data on the outcomes of home-based biologic infusions for patients with IBD. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of biologic infusions for IBD patients who receive either home- or office-based administration.

Methods: Patients receiving infliximab or vedolizumab were analyzed retrospectively over a period of 152 weeks. Survival free of major adverse events including delayed infusion reaction, steroid initiation, drug discontinuation, or IBD-related emergency department visits, admission, and surgery were compared using a Kaplan-Meier curve. Individual adverse events, infusion-.related quality measures, and markers of patient adherence were analyzed.

Results: Adverse event-free survival was greater among those receiving home-based infusion (n = 154) compared with office-based infusion (n = 133). The office infusion cohort had higher rates of delayed infusion reactions (4 vs 0), IBD-related surgery (6 vs 0), and drug discontinuation (44 vs 35); this was a sicker cohort of patients compared with those in the home infusion group. Home infusion patients were less likely to receive correct weight-based dosing for infliximab (71.7% vs 89.3%), obtain labs for drug monitoring (53.2% vs 71.4%), and adhere to routine clinic visits (37.9% vs 58.1%).

Conclusions: The home-based infusion of biologics for IBD appears safe with lower rates of major adverse events compared with office-based infusions. However, those receiving home infusion were less likely to receive correct weight-based dosing for infliximab and were poorly adherent to routine follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.10%
发文量
462
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases® supports the mission of the Crohn''s & Colitis Foundation by bringing the most impactful and cutting edge clinical topics and research findings related to inflammatory bowel diseases to clinicians and researchers working in IBD and related fields. The Journal is committed to publishing on innovative topics that influence the future of clinical care, treatment, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信