评估美国血液透析血管通路临床实践指南中患者特定治疗建议的水平。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
American Health and Drug Benefits Pub Date : 2018-07-01
Gilbert L Queeley, Ellen S Campbell, Askal A Ali
{"title":"评估美国血液透析血管通路临床实践指南中患者特定治疗建议的水平。","authors":"Gilbert L Queeley,&nbsp;Ellen S Campbell,&nbsp;Askal A Ali","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemodialysis is a procedure that requires efficient removal and return of blood to a patient's body. Despite being a life-sustaining process, hemodialysis is associated with morbidity, mortality, and high societal costs. A significant part of the financial costs to patients and society at large can be attributed to vascular access dysfunction. The cornerstone to efficient hemodialysis is a well-functioning vascular access that simultaneously allows efficient blood flow for dialysis and easy cannulation. It is hypothesized that the poor health outcomes associated with vascular access dysfunction can be improved by paying closer attention to patient-specific factors in clinical guidelines for hemodialysis vascular access. This may require a shift to a more patient-centered approach to vascular access management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the presence of patient-specific treatment recommendations in the current clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis vascular access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of PubMed and professional nephrology organization websites for full-text clinical practice guidelines with treatment recommendations regarding hemodialysis vascular access. We developed a coding sheet to document the number of patient-specific treatment recommendations and other quality attributes found in the extracted clinical practice guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search resulted in the extraction of 5 clinical practice guidelines for final review. Only 1 of the 5 extracted guidelines was found to contain patient-specific treatment recommendations, but the treatment recommendations were limited to juvenile patients. Of the 5 clinical practice guidelines, 4 were published within the past decade (ie, after 2006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings show that current clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis vascular access lack patient-specific recommendations. Future clinical guidelines must consider patient-specific treatment recommendations with the goal of improving hemodialysis vascular access outcomes for patients, a goal that is supported in the recommendations of the National Kidney Foundation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48595,"journal":{"name":"American Health and Drug Benefits","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6207304/pdf/ahdb-11-223.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Level of Patient-Specific Treatment Recommendations in Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hemodialysis Vascular Access in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Gilbert L Queeley,&nbsp;Ellen S Campbell,&nbsp;Askal A Ali\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemodialysis is a procedure that requires efficient removal and return of blood to a patient's body. Despite being a life-sustaining process, hemodialysis is associated with morbidity, mortality, and high societal costs. A significant part of the financial costs to patients and society at large can be attributed to vascular access dysfunction. The cornerstone to efficient hemodialysis is a well-functioning vascular access that simultaneously allows efficient blood flow for dialysis and easy cannulation. It is hypothesized that the poor health outcomes associated with vascular access dysfunction can be improved by paying closer attention to patient-specific factors in clinical guidelines for hemodialysis vascular access. This may require a shift to a more patient-centered approach to vascular access management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the presence of patient-specific treatment recommendations in the current clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis vascular access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of PubMed and professional nephrology organization websites for full-text clinical practice guidelines with treatment recommendations regarding hemodialysis vascular access. We developed a coding sheet to document the number of patient-specific treatment recommendations and other quality attributes found in the extracted clinical practice guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search resulted in the extraction of 5 clinical practice guidelines for final review. Only 1 of the 5 extracted guidelines was found to contain patient-specific treatment recommendations, but the treatment recommendations were limited to juvenile patients. Of the 5 clinical practice guidelines, 4 were published within the past decade (ie, after 2006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings show that current clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis vascular access lack patient-specific recommendations. Future clinical guidelines must consider patient-specific treatment recommendations with the goal of improving hemodialysis vascular access outcomes for patients, a goal that is supported in the recommendations of the National Kidney Foundation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Health and Drug Benefits\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6207304/pdf/ahdb-11-223.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Health and Drug Benefits\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Health and Drug Benefits","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血液透析是一种需要有效去除血液并将其返回患者体内的程序。尽管血液透析是一个维持生命的过程,但它与发病率、死亡率和高社会成本有关。患者和整个社会的经济成本很大一部分可归因于血管通路功能障碍。高效血液透析的基石是功能良好的血管通路,它同时允许高效的血液流动用于透析和简单的插管。据推测,通过在血液透析血管通路临床指南中更加关注患者特定因素,可以改善与血管通路功能障碍相关的不良健康结果。这可能需要转向以患者为中心的血管通路管理方法。目的:评估当前血液透析血管通路临床实践指南中是否存在针对患者的治疗建议。方法:我们在PubMed和专业肾脏病组织网站上进行了系统搜索,以获取关于血液透析血管通路的全文临床实践指南和治疗建议。我们开发了一份编码表,以记录提取的临床实践指南中针对患者的治疗建议数量和其他质量属性。结果:我们的搜索结果提取了5个临床实践指南供最终审查。在提取的5份指南中,只有1份包含针对患者的治疗建议,但治疗建议仅限于青少年患者。在5份临床实践指南中,有4份是在过去十年内(即2006年之后)发布的。结论:我们的研究结果表明,目前血液透析血管通路的临床实践指南缺乏针对患者的建议。未来的临床指南必须考虑患者的具体治疗建议,以改善患者的血液透析血管通路结果,这一目标得到了国家肾脏基金会的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing the Level of Patient-Specific Treatment Recommendations in Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hemodialysis Vascular Access in the United States.

Assessing the Level of Patient-Specific Treatment Recommendations in Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hemodialysis Vascular Access in the United States.

Assessing the Level of Patient-Specific Treatment Recommendations in Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hemodialysis Vascular Access in the United States.

Background: Hemodialysis is a procedure that requires efficient removal and return of blood to a patient's body. Despite being a life-sustaining process, hemodialysis is associated with morbidity, mortality, and high societal costs. A significant part of the financial costs to patients and society at large can be attributed to vascular access dysfunction. The cornerstone to efficient hemodialysis is a well-functioning vascular access that simultaneously allows efficient blood flow for dialysis and easy cannulation. It is hypothesized that the poor health outcomes associated with vascular access dysfunction can be improved by paying closer attention to patient-specific factors in clinical guidelines for hemodialysis vascular access. This may require a shift to a more patient-centered approach to vascular access management.

Objective: To assess the presence of patient-specific treatment recommendations in the current clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis vascular access.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed and professional nephrology organization websites for full-text clinical practice guidelines with treatment recommendations regarding hemodialysis vascular access. We developed a coding sheet to document the number of patient-specific treatment recommendations and other quality attributes found in the extracted clinical practice guidelines.

Results: Our search resulted in the extraction of 5 clinical practice guidelines for final review. Only 1 of the 5 extracted guidelines was found to contain patient-specific treatment recommendations, but the treatment recommendations were limited to juvenile patients. Of the 5 clinical practice guidelines, 4 were published within the past decade (ie, after 2006).

Conclusion: Our findings show that current clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis vascular access lack patient-specific recommendations. Future clinical guidelines must consider patient-specific treatment recommendations with the goal of improving hemodialysis vascular access outcomes for patients, a goal that is supported in the recommendations of the National Kidney Foundation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Health and Drug Benefits
American Health and Drug Benefits Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: AHDB welcomes articles on clinical-, policy-, and business-related topics relevant to the integration of the forces in healthcare that affect the cost and quality of healthcare delivery, improve healthcare quality, and ultimately result in access to care, focusing on health organization structures and processes, health information, health policies, health and behavioral economics, as well as health technologies, products, and patient behaviors relevant to value-based quality of care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信