癌症患者替代NTRK检测策略的成本-效果:对三个欧洲国家的分析。

Personalized medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-25 DOI:10.2217/pme-2022-0070
Heleen Vellekoop, Simone Huygens, Matthijs Versteegh, László Szilberhorn, Tamás Zelei, Balázs Nagy, Rositsa Koleva-Kolarova, Sarah Wordsworth, Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
{"title":"癌症患者替代NTRK检测策略的成本-效果:对三个欧洲国家的分析。","authors":"Heleen Vellekoop,&nbsp;Simone Huygens,&nbsp;Matthijs Versteegh,&nbsp;László Szilberhorn,&nbsp;Tamás Zelei,&nbsp;Balázs Nagy,&nbsp;Rositsa Koleva-Kolarova,&nbsp;Sarah Wordsworth,&nbsp;Maureen Rutten-van Mölken","doi":"10.2217/pme-2022-0070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To explore variations in the cost-effectiveness of entrectinib across different testing strategies and settings. <b>Methods:</b> Four testing strategies where adult cancer patients received entrectinib if they tested positive for <i>NTRK</i> gene fusions compared with 'no testing' and standard of care (SoC) for all patients were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> Immunohistochemistry for all patients followed by RNA-based next-generation sequencing after a positive result was the optimal strategy in all included countries. However, the incremental net monetary benefit compared with SoC was negative in all countries, ranging between international euros (int€) -206 and -404. In a subgroup analysis with only <i>NTRK</i>-positive patients, the incremental net monetary benefit was int€ 8405 in England, int€ -53,088 in Hungary and int€ 54,372 in The Netherlands. <b>Conclusion:</b> Using the cost-effectiveness thresholds recommended by national guidelines, none of the testing strategies were cost-effective compared with no testing. The implementation of entrectinib is unlikely to become cost-effective in Hungary, due to the large cost difference between the entrectinib and SoC arms, while there might be more potential in England and The Netherlands.</p>","PeriodicalId":94167,"journal":{"name":"Personalized medicine","volume":"20 4","pages":"321-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness of alternative <i>NTRK</i> testing strategies in cancer patients followed by histology-independent therapy with entrectinib: an analysis of three European countries.\",\"authors\":\"Heleen Vellekoop,&nbsp;Simone Huygens,&nbsp;Matthijs Versteegh,&nbsp;László Szilberhorn,&nbsp;Tamás Zelei,&nbsp;Balázs Nagy,&nbsp;Rositsa Koleva-Kolarova,&nbsp;Sarah Wordsworth,&nbsp;Maureen Rutten-van Mölken\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/pme-2022-0070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To explore variations in the cost-effectiveness of entrectinib across different testing strategies and settings. <b>Methods:</b> Four testing strategies where adult cancer patients received entrectinib if they tested positive for <i>NTRK</i> gene fusions compared with 'no testing' and standard of care (SoC) for all patients were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> Immunohistochemistry for all patients followed by RNA-based next-generation sequencing after a positive result was the optimal strategy in all included countries. However, the incremental net monetary benefit compared with SoC was negative in all countries, ranging between international euros (int€) -206 and -404. In a subgroup analysis with only <i>NTRK</i>-positive patients, the incremental net monetary benefit was int€ 8405 in England, int€ -53,088 in Hungary and int€ 54,372 in The Netherlands. <b>Conclusion:</b> Using the cost-effectiveness thresholds recommended by national guidelines, none of the testing strategies were cost-effective compared with no testing. The implementation of entrectinib is unlikely to become cost-effective in Hungary, due to the large cost difference between the entrectinib and SoC arms, while there might be more potential in England and The Netherlands.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personalized medicine\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"321-338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personalized medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2022-0070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2022-0070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨不同测试策略和环境下恩替尼成本效益的差异。方法:评估四种检测策略,即如果成年癌症患者NTRK基因融合检测呈阳性,则接受恩替尼治疗,与所有患者的“无检测”和护理标准(SoC)进行比较。结果:在所有纳入的国家,对所有患者进行免疫组化,然后在阳性结果后进行基于RNA的下一代测序是最佳策略。然而,与SoC相比,所有国家的净货币收益增量均为负值,介于国际欧元(int€)-206至-404之间。在仅对NTRK阳性患者进行的亚组分析中,英格兰的增量净货币收益为8405欧元,匈牙利为-53088欧元,荷兰为54372欧元。结论:使用国家指南推荐的成本效益阈值,与不进行测试相比,没有一种测试策略具有成本效益。由于恩特替尼和SoC武器之间的巨大成本差异,恩特替尼在匈牙利的实施不太可能具有成本效益,而在英格兰和荷兰可能有更大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-effectiveness of alternative NTRK testing strategies in cancer patients followed by histology-independent therapy with entrectinib: an analysis of three European countries.

Aim: To explore variations in the cost-effectiveness of entrectinib across different testing strategies and settings. Methods: Four testing strategies where adult cancer patients received entrectinib if they tested positive for NTRK gene fusions compared with 'no testing' and standard of care (SoC) for all patients were evaluated. Results: Immunohistochemistry for all patients followed by RNA-based next-generation sequencing after a positive result was the optimal strategy in all included countries. However, the incremental net monetary benefit compared with SoC was negative in all countries, ranging between international euros (int€) -206 and -404. In a subgroup analysis with only NTRK-positive patients, the incremental net monetary benefit was int€ 8405 in England, int€ -53,088 in Hungary and int€ 54,372 in The Netherlands. Conclusion: Using the cost-effectiveness thresholds recommended by national guidelines, none of the testing strategies were cost-effective compared with no testing. The implementation of entrectinib is unlikely to become cost-effective in Hungary, due to the large cost difference between the entrectinib and SoC arms, while there might be more potential in England and The Netherlands.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信