药物不依从性推理量表(MedNARS):发展和心理测量特性评估。

IF 2.4 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Promotion Perspectives Pub Date : 2023-09-11 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.34172/hpp.2023.26
Hamid Allahverdipour, Majid Badri, Abdolreza Shaghaghi, Hassan Mahmoodi, Haleh Heizomi, Shayesteh Shirzadi, Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi
{"title":"药物不依从性推理量表(MedNARS):发展和心理测量特性评估。","authors":"Hamid Allahverdipour,&nbsp;Majid Badri,&nbsp;Abdolreza Shaghaghi,&nbsp;Hassan Mahmoodi,&nbsp;Haleh Heizomi,&nbsp;Shayesteh Shirzadi,&nbsp;Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi","doi":"10.34172/hpp.2023.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proper elucidation of medication non-adherence reasoning especially in older adults might pave the way for an auspicious therapeutic outcome. The main aim of this study was to develop and psychometrically test the Medications Non-adherence Reasoning (MedNARS) questionnaire for application in research and probably practice settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods design was utilized to develop the MedNARS. The item pool was mainly generated based on a qualitative query and literature review. The expert panel approved version of the MedNARS was psychometrically assessed on a convenience sample of 220 older patients with chronic disease. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content and face validity of the scale were appraised and its construct validity was assed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A nine-item version of the MedNARS was drafted based on the classical item analysis procedures and its estimated internal consistency measure of the Cronbach's alpha (0.85) and test-retest reliability (0.96) were in the vicinity of acceptable range. The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) output revealed a unidimensional structure for the MedNARS and the conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated an acceptable data fit for the extracted one-factor model. The goodness of fit indices were as the followings: χ<sup>2</sup> /df=1.63(90% CI: 0.02 to 0.11), root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA)=(0.07), comparative fit index (CFI)=0.95, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI)=0.93 and standardized root mean squared residual (SRMSR)=(0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study findings were indicative of MedNARS's applicability and feasibility for use in assessment of medication non-adherence reasoning among the elderly patients with chronic diseases. The MedNARS as a brief and elder-friendly instrument can be applied both in research and practice settings to enhance efficiency, safety, and health outcomes of the therapeutic recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":46588,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10558970/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medications Non-adherence Reasoning Scale (MedNARS): Development and psychometric properties appraisal.\",\"authors\":\"Hamid Allahverdipour,&nbsp;Majid Badri,&nbsp;Abdolreza Shaghaghi,&nbsp;Hassan Mahmoodi,&nbsp;Haleh Heizomi,&nbsp;Shayesteh Shirzadi,&nbsp;Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/hpp.2023.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proper elucidation of medication non-adherence reasoning especially in older adults might pave the way for an auspicious therapeutic outcome. The main aim of this study was to develop and psychometrically test the Medications Non-adherence Reasoning (MedNARS) questionnaire for application in research and probably practice settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods design was utilized to develop the MedNARS. The item pool was mainly generated based on a qualitative query and literature review. The expert panel approved version of the MedNARS was psychometrically assessed on a convenience sample of 220 older patients with chronic disease. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content and face validity of the scale were appraised and its construct validity was assed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A nine-item version of the MedNARS was drafted based on the classical item analysis procedures and its estimated internal consistency measure of the Cronbach's alpha (0.85) and test-retest reliability (0.96) were in the vicinity of acceptable range. The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) output revealed a unidimensional structure for the MedNARS and the conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated an acceptable data fit for the extracted one-factor model. The goodness of fit indices were as the followings: χ<sup>2</sup> /df=1.63(90% CI: 0.02 to 0.11), root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA)=(0.07), comparative fit index (CFI)=0.95, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI)=0.93 and standardized root mean squared residual (SRMSR)=(0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study findings were indicative of MedNARS's applicability and feasibility for use in assessment of medication non-adherence reasoning among the elderly patients with chronic diseases. The MedNARS as a brief and elder-friendly instrument can be applied both in research and practice settings to enhance efficiency, safety, and health outcomes of the therapeutic recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Perspectives\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10558970/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2023.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2023.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:适当阐明药物不依从性的理由,尤其是在老年人中,可能会为良好的治疗结果铺平道路。本研究的主要目的是开发和心理测量测试药物不依从性推理(MedNARS)问卷,以应用于研究和可能的实践环境。方法:采用混合方法设计MedNARS。项目库主要基于定性查询和文献综述生成。专家小组批准的MedNARS版本是在220名老年慢性病患者的方便样本上进行心理测量评估的。采用探索性和验证性因素分析对量表的内部一致性、重测信度、内容和面效性进行了评价,并对其结构有效性进行了评定。结果:MedNARS的九项版本是基于经典项目分析程序起草的,其Cronbachα(0.85)和重测可靠性(0.96)的内部一致性估计值在可接受范围附近。探索性因素分析(EFA)的输出揭示了MedNARS的一维结构,而进行的验证性因素分析表明,所提取的单因素模型的数据符合可接受的要求。拟合优度指数为:χ2/df=1.63(90%CI:0.02~0.11),近似均方根误差(RMSEA)=(0.07),比较拟合指数(CFI)=0.95,Tucker Lewis指数(TLI)=0.93,标准化均方根残差(SRMSR)=(0.05)。结论:研究结果表明MedNARS在评估老年慢性病患者药物不依从性推理中的适用性和可行性。MedNARS作为一种简短且对老年人友好的仪器,可以应用于研究和实践环境中,以提高治疗建议的效率、安全性和健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Medications Non-adherence Reasoning Scale (MedNARS): Development and psychometric properties appraisal.

Medications Non-adherence Reasoning Scale (MedNARS): Development and psychometric properties appraisal.

Medications Non-adherence Reasoning Scale (MedNARS): Development and psychometric properties appraisal.

Background: Proper elucidation of medication non-adherence reasoning especially in older adults might pave the way for an auspicious therapeutic outcome. The main aim of this study was to develop and psychometrically test the Medications Non-adherence Reasoning (MedNARS) questionnaire for application in research and probably practice settings.

Methods: A mixed methods design was utilized to develop the MedNARS. The item pool was mainly generated based on a qualitative query and literature review. The expert panel approved version of the MedNARS was psychometrically assessed on a convenience sample of 220 older patients with chronic disease. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content and face validity of the scale were appraised and its construct validity was assed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.

Results: A nine-item version of the MedNARS was drafted based on the classical item analysis procedures and its estimated internal consistency measure of the Cronbach's alpha (0.85) and test-retest reliability (0.96) were in the vicinity of acceptable range. The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) output revealed a unidimensional structure for the MedNARS and the conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated an acceptable data fit for the extracted one-factor model. The goodness of fit indices were as the followings: χ2 /df=1.63(90% CI: 0.02 to 0.11), root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA)=(0.07), comparative fit index (CFI)=0.95, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI)=0.93 and standardized root mean squared residual (SRMSR)=(0.05).

Conclusion: The study findings were indicative of MedNARS's applicability and feasibility for use in assessment of medication non-adherence reasoning among the elderly patients with chronic diseases. The MedNARS as a brief and elder-friendly instrument can be applied both in research and practice settings to enhance efficiency, safety, and health outcomes of the therapeutic recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Perspectives
Health Promotion Perspectives PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信