展望:在NIMH主办的第25届心理健康服务研究会议上强调的经济和政策研究兴趣。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Jennifer L Humensky, Michael C Freed, Susan T Azrin, Mary Acri, Denise Pintello
{"title":"展望:在NIMH主办的第25届心理健康服务研究会议上强调的经济和政策研究兴趣。","authors":"Jennifer L Humensky, Michael C Freed, Susan T Azrin, Mary Acri, Denise Pintello","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) remains committed to addressing real-world challenges with delivering high quality mental health care to people in need by advancing a services research agenda to improve access, continuity, quality, equity, and value of mental healthcare nationwide, and to improve outcomes for people with serious mental illnesses (SMI). The NIMH-Sponsored Mental Health Services Research Conference (MHSR) is a highly productive venue for discussing topics of interest to NIMH audiences and disseminating NIMH's latest research findings directly to mental health clinicians, policy makers, administrators, advocates, consumers, and scientists who attend.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This Perspective summarizes and provides highlights from the 25th MHSR. It also reviews three papers presented at the 25th MSHR and subsequently published in the June 2023 special issue of The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics (JMHPE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors review three papers published in the June 2023 special issue of JMHPE, identifying common themes across the papers and illustrating how the papers' findings promote key areas of NIMH research interests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three important areas are highlighted in this review: (i) service user engagement in the research enterprise, (ii) financing the implementation of the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, and (iii) methods to predict mental health workforce turnover.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These three papers illustrate key areas in which policy research can help to promote quality mental health care. One notable common theme across the papers is that of the role that end users play in the research enterprise. The papers focus on (i) service users and the value they bring to informing the practice of research, (ii) policy makers and the information they need to make evidence-informed decisions, and (iii) provider organization leadership, by using an innovative machine learning process to help organizations predict and address staff turnover.</p><p><strong>Implications for health care: </strong>NIMH encourages and often requires strong research practice partnerships to help ensure findings will be of value to end users and make their way into the practice setting. The three papers reviewed in this perspective are exemplars of how necessary stakeholder partnerships are to improve care for those with mental illness.</p><p><strong>Implications for health policies: </strong>The highlighted papers (i) provide recommendations for structural changes to research institutions to increase service user engagement in all aspects of the research enterprise, (ii) identify policy solutions to improve fiscal readiness to address increased demand of 988, and (iii) pilot a novel data-driven approach to predict mental health workforce turnover, a significant problem in community mental health clinics, offering health system leaders and policy makers an opportunity to proactively intervene to help maintain continuity of staffing.</p><p><strong>Implications for further research: </strong>Consistent with NIMH's Strategic Plan for Research and current funding announcements, there remains an urgent need to (i) develop strategies to better implement, scale, and sustain existing evidence-supported treatments and services, particularly in historically underserved communities, and (ii) develop, test, and evaluate new solutions to improve access, continuity, quality, equity, and value of care.ing and clinical outcomes remains uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":46381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","volume":"26 3","pages":"109-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11040969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERSPECTIVE: Economic and Policy Research Interests Highlighted in the 25th NIMH-Sponsored Mental Health Services Research Conference.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer L Humensky, Michael C Freed, Susan T Azrin, Mary Acri, Denise Pintello\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) remains committed to addressing real-world challenges with delivering high quality mental health care to people in need by advancing a services research agenda to improve access, continuity, quality, equity, and value of mental healthcare nationwide, and to improve outcomes for people with serious mental illnesses (SMI). The NIMH-Sponsored Mental Health Services Research Conference (MHSR) is a highly productive venue for discussing topics of interest to NIMH audiences and disseminating NIMH's latest research findings directly to mental health clinicians, policy makers, administrators, advocates, consumers, and scientists who attend.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This Perspective summarizes and provides highlights from the 25th MHSR. It also reviews three papers presented at the 25th MSHR and subsequently published in the June 2023 special issue of The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics (JMHPE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors review three papers published in the June 2023 special issue of JMHPE, identifying common themes across the papers and illustrating how the papers' findings promote key areas of NIMH research interests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three important areas are highlighted in this review: (i) service user engagement in the research enterprise, (ii) financing the implementation of the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, and (iii) methods to predict mental health workforce turnover.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These three papers illustrate key areas in which policy research can help to promote quality mental health care. One notable common theme across the papers is that of the role that end users play in the research enterprise. The papers focus on (i) service users and the value they bring to informing the practice of research, (ii) policy makers and the information they need to make evidence-informed decisions, and (iii) provider organization leadership, by using an innovative machine learning process to help organizations predict and address staff turnover.</p><p><strong>Implications for health care: </strong>NIMH encourages and often requires strong research practice partnerships to help ensure findings will be of value to end users and make their way into the practice setting. The three papers reviewed in this perspective are exemplars of how necessary stakeholder partnerships are to improve care for those with mental illness.</p><p><strong>Implications for health policies: </strong>The highlighted papers (i) provide recommendations for structural changes to research institutions to increase service user engagement in all aspects of the research enterprise, (ii) identify policy solutions to improve fiscal readiness to address increased demand of 988, and (iii) pilot a novel data-driven approach to predict mental health workforce turnover, a significant problem in community mental health clinics, offering health system leaders and policy makers an opportunity to proactively intervene to help maintain continuity of staffing.</p><p><strong>Implications for further research: </strong>Consistent with NIMH's Strategic Plan for Research and current funding announcements, there remains an urgent need to (i) develop strategies to better implement, scale, and sustain existing evidence-supported treatments and services, particularly in historically underserved communities, and (ii) develop, test, and evaluate new solutions to improve access, continuity, quality, equity, and value of care.ing and clinical outcomes remains uncertain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"109-114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11040969/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国国家心理健康研究所(NIMH)仍然致力于解决现实世界的挑战,通过推进服务研究议程,为有需要的人提供高质量的心理健康护理,以改善全国心理健康的可及性、连续性、质量、公平性和价值,并改善严重精神疾病患者的治疗效果。NIMH赞助的心理健康服务研究会议(MHSR)是一个高效的场所,可以讨论NIMH受众感兴趣的话题,并将NIMH的最新研究结果直接传播给参加会议的心理健康临床医生、政策制定者、管理者、倡导者、消费者和科学家。目标:本观点总结并提供了第25届MHSR的亮点。它还回顾了在第25届MSHR上发表的三篇论文,随后发表在2023年6月的《心理健康政策与经济学杂志》(JMHPE)特刊上。方法:作者回顾了发表在2023年6月的JMHPE特刊上的三篇论文,确定了论文中的共同主题,并说明了论文的发现如何促进NIMH研究兴趣的关键领域。结果:本综述强调了三个重要领域:(i)研究企业中的服务用户参与度,(ii)为988自杀和危机生命线的实施提供资金,以及(iii)预测心理健康劳动力流动的方法。讨论:这三篇论文说明了政策研究可以帮助促进高质量心理健康护理的关键领域。论文中一个值得注意的共同主题是最终用户在研究企业中扮演的角色。这些论文侧重于(i)服务用户及其为研究实践提供信息的价值,(ii)决策者及其做出证据知情决策所需的信息,以及(iii)提供者组织的领导力,通过使用创新的机器学习过程来帮助组织预测和解决员工流动问题。对医疗保健的影响:NIMH鼓励并经常要求建立强有力的研究与实践伙伴关系,以帮助确保研究结果对最终用户有价值,并进入实践环境。从这个角度回顾的三篇论文是利益相关者伙伴关系对改善精神疾病患者护理的必要性的例证。对卫生政策的影响:重点论文(i)为研究机构的结构变革提供建议,以提高研究企业各方面的服务用户参与度,这是社区心理健康诊所的一个重大问题,为卫生系统领导人和政策制定者提供了主动干预的机会,以帮助保持人员配置的连续性。对进一步研究的影响:与NIMH的研究战略计划和当前的资助公告一致,仍然迫切需要(i)制定战略,更好地实施、扩大和维持现有的证据支持的治疗和服务,特别是在历史上服务不足的社区,护理的连续性、质量、公平性和价值。ng和临床结果仍不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PERSPECTIVE: Economic and Policy Research Interests Highlighted in the 25th NIMH-Sponsored Mental Health Services Research Conference.

Background: The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) remains committed to addressing real-world challenges with delivering high quality mental health care to people in need by advancing a services research agenda to improve access, continuity, quality, equity, and value of mental healthcare nationwide, and to improve outcomes for people with serious mental illnesses (SMI). The NIMH-Sponsored Mental Health Services Research Conference (MHSR) is a highly productive venue for discussing topics of interest to NIMH audiences and disseminating NIMH's latest research findings directly to mental health clinicians, policy makers, administrators, advocates, consumers, and scientists who attend.

Aims: This Perspective summarizes and provides highlights from the 25th MHSR. It also reviews three papers presented at the 25th MSHR and subsequently published in the June 2023 special issue of The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics (JMHPE).

Methods: The authors review three papers published in the June 2023 special issue of JMHPE, identifying common themes across the papers and illustrating how the papers' findings promote key areas of NIMH research interests.

Results: Three important areas are highlighted in this review: (i) service user engagement in the research enterprise, (ii) financing the implementation of the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, and (iii) methods to predict mental health workforce turnover.

Discussion: These three papers illustrate key areas in which policy research can help to promote quality mental health care. One notable common theme across the papers is that of the role that end users play in the research enterprise. The papers focus on (i) service users and the value they bring to informing the practice of research, (ii) policy makers and the information they need to make evidence-informed decisions, and (iii) provider organization leadership, by using an innovative machine learning process to help organizations predict and address staff turnover.

Implications for health care: NIMH encourages and often requires strong research practice partnerships to help ensure findings will be of value to end users and make their way into the practice setting. The three papers reviewed in this perspective are exemplars of how necessary stakeholder partnerships are to improve care for those with mental illness.

Implications for health policies: The highlighted papers (i) provide recommendations for structural changes to research institutions to increase service user engagement in all aspects of the research enterprise, (ii) identify policy solutions to improve fiscal readiness to address increased demand of 988, and (iii) pilot a novel data-driven approach to predict mental health workforce turnover, a significant problem in community mental health clinics, offering health system leaders and policy makers an opportunity to proactively intervene to help maintain continuity of staffing.

Implications for further research: Consistent with NIMH's Strategic Plan for Research and current funding announcements, there remains an urgent need to (i) develop strategies to better implement, scale, and sustain existing evidence-supported treatments and services, particularly in historically underserved communities, and (ii) develop, test, and evaluate new solutions to improve access, continuity, quality, equity, and value of care.ing and clinical outcomes remains uncertain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics publishes high quality empirical, analytical and methodologic papers focusing on the application of health and economic research and policy analysis in mental health. It offers an international forum to enable the different participants in mental health policy and economics - psychiatrists involved in research and care and other mental health workers, health services researchers, health economists, policy makers, public and private health providers, advocacy groups, and the pharmaceutical industry - to share common information in a common language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信