患者和医疗保健利益相关者对实施远程医疗服务进行术前评估的看法和态度:定性分析。

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2023-06-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2023.0023
Eileen Lew, Sean F J Tan, Agnes Teo, Ban L Sng, Elaine P M Lum
{"title":"患者和医疗保健利益相关者对实施远程医疗服务进行术前评估的看法和态度:定性分析。","authors":"Eileen Lew,&nbsp;Sean F J Tan,&nbsp;Agnes Teo,&nbsp;Ban L Sng,&nbsp;Elaine P M Lum","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2023.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies suggest that preoperative evaluation can be effectively conducted through telehealth. As the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated digital transformation, we hypothesize that a new telehealth model of care may be feasibly implemented for preoperative evaluation at our institution. This qualitative study seeks to evaluate the attitudes and perception of elective surgery patients and health care providers toward telehealth conducted for preanesthesia evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At a tertiary women's hospital in Asia, health care providers and elective surgery patients were recruited by convenience and snowball sampling to undergo one-on-one semistructured interviews regarding a new telehealth model of care for preanesthesia evaluation, under-pinned by the Normalization Process Theory. Data were analyzed, coded, and consolidated into themes using the framework analysis method by a team of four researchers from diverse backgrounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five interviews were conducted among 10 patients and 15 health care participants. Ninety-five codes were identified, consolidated into four themes that connect to guide the implementation of a new telehealth pathway for preoperative care, mapped to the Normalization Process Theory. The themes pertain to advantages of telehealth workflow (coherence), requisites for new telehealth workflow (coherence, collective action), barriers to implementation (cognitive participation, collective action), and enablers of implementation (cognitive participation, collective action). All participants were receptive to telehealth, but health care participants expressed concern about the impact of additional tasks on current clinical workload. Training in videoconferencing was deemed essential by both patients and health care providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study has provided insights into levels of coherence and cognitive participation among patients and health care providers. The telehealth workflow should be redesigned, considering systems' constraints and stakeholders' needs. Greater buy-in is needed to gain health care providers' commitment for collective action. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05781789.</p>","PeriodicalId":94218,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"4 1","pages":"156-165"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10523403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions and Attitudes of Patients and Health Care Stakeholders on Implementing a Telehealth Service for Preoperative Evaluation: A Qualitative Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Eileen Lew,&nbsp;Sean F J Tan,&nbsp;Agnes Teo,&nbsp;Ban L Sng,&nbsp;Elaine P M Lum\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmr.2023.0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies suggest that preoperative evaluation can be effectively conducted through telehealth. As the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated digital transformation, we hypothesize that a new telehealth model of care may be feasibly implemented for preoperative evaluation at our institution. This qualitative study seeks to evaluate the attitudes and perception of elective surgery patients and health care providers toward telehealth conducted for preanesthesia evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At a tertiary women's hospital in Asia, health care providers and elective surgery patients were recruited by convenience and snowball sampling to undergo one-on-one semistructured interviews regarding a new telehealth model of care for preanesthesia evaluation, under-pinned by the Normalization Process Theory. Data were analyzed, coded, and consolidated into themes using the framework analysis method by a team of four researchers from diverse backgrounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five interviews were conducted among 10 patients and 15 health care participants. Ninety-five codes were identified, consolidated into four themes that connect to guide the implementation of a new telehealth pathway for preoperative care, mapped to the Normalization Process Theory. The themes pertain to advantages of telehealth workflow (coherence), requisites for new telehealth workflow (coherence, collective action), barriers to implementation (cognitive participation, collective action), and enablers of implementation (cognitive participation, collective action). All participants were receptive to telehealth, but health care participants expressed concern about the impact of additional tasks on current clinical workload. Training in videoconferencing was deemed essential by both patients and health care providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study has provided insights into levels of coherence and cognitive participation among patients and health care providers. The telehealth workflow should be redesigned, considering systems' constraints and stakeholders' needs. Greater buy-in is needed to gain health care providers' commitment for collective action. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05781789.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"156-165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10523403/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究表明,通过远程医疗可以有效地进行术前评估。随着新冠肺炎大流行加速了数字化转型,我们假设在我们的机构进行术前评估时,可能会实施一种新的远程医疗护理模式。这项定性研究旨在评估择期手术患者和医疗保健提供者对植入前评估的远程医疗的态度和看法。方法:在亚洲一家三级女子医院,通过便利抽样和滚雪球抽样的方式招募医疗服务提供者和择期手术患者,就一种新的嵌套前评估远程医疗模式进行一对一的半结构访谈。由来自不同背景的四名研究人员组成的团队使用框架分析方法对数据进行分析、编码并合并为主题。结果:对10名患者和15名健康护理参与者进行了25次访谈。确定了95个代码,并将其合并为四个主题,以指导实施一种新的术前护理远程医疗途径,该途径与规范化过程理论相一致。主题涉及远程医疗工作流程的优势(一致性)、新的远程医疗工作流的必要条件(一致性、集体行动)、实施的障碍(认知参与、共同行动)和实施的推动者(认知参与和集体行动)。所有参与者都接受远程医疗,但医疗保健参与者对额外任务对当前临床工作量的影响表示担忧。患者和医疗保健提供者都认为视频会议培训至关重要。结论:该研究深入了解了患者和医疗保健提供者之间的一致性和认知参与水平。远程医疗工作流程应该重新设计,考虑到系统的限制和利益相关者的需求。需要更多的支持,以获得医疗保健提供者对集体行动的承诺。Clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT05781789。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Perceptions and Attitudes of Patients and Health Care Stakeholders on Implementing a Telehealth Service for Preoperative Evaluation: A Qualitative Analysis.

Perceptions and Attitudes of Patients and Health Care Stakeholders on Implementing a Telehealth Service for Preoperative Evaluation: A Qualitative Analysis.

Perceptions and Attitudes of Patients and Health Care Stakeholders on Implementing a Telehealth Service for Preoperative Evaluation: A Qualitative Analysis.

Perceptions and Attitudes of Patients and Health Care Stakeholders on Implementing a Telehealth Service for Preoperative Evaluation: A Qualitative Analysis.

Background: Studies suggest that preoperative evaluation can be effectively conducted through telehealth. As the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated digital transformation, we hypothesize that a new telehealth model of care may be feasibly implemented for preoperative evaluation at our institution. This qualitative study seeks to evaluate the attitudes and perception of elective surgery patients and health care providers toward telehealth conducted for preanesthesia evaluation.

Methods: At a tertiary women's hospital in Asia, health care providers and elective surgery patients were recruited by convenience and snowball sampling to undergo one-on-one semistructured interviews regarding a new telehealth model of care for preanesthesia evaluation, under-pinned by the Normalization Process Theory. Data were analyzed, coded, and consolidated into themes using the framework analysis method by a team of four researchers from diverse backgrounds.

Results: Twenty-five interviews were conducted among 10 patients and 15 health care participants. Ninety-five codes were identified, consolidated into four themes that connect to guide the implementation of a new telehealth pathway for preoperative care, mapped to the Normalization Process Theory. The themes pertain to advantages of telehealth workflow (coherence), requisites for new telehealth workflow (coherence, collective action), barriers to implementation (cognitive participation, collective action), and enablers of implementation (cognitive participation, collective action). All participants were receptive to telehealth, but health care participants expressed concern about the impact of additional tasks on current clinical workload. Training in videoconferencing was deemed essential by both patients and health care providers.

Conclusions: The study has provided insights into levels of coherence and cognitive participation among patients and health care providers. The telehealth workflow should be redesigned, considering systems' constraints and stakeholders' needs. Greater buy-in is needed to gain health care providers' commitment for collective action. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05781789.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信