在健康成年人中测试肘关节位置感的再测试可靠性。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
John V. Rider PhD, MS, OTR/L, MSCS, Kristin A. Valdes OTD, OTR, CHT
{"title":"在健康成年人中测试肘关节位置感的再测试可靠性。","authors":"John V. Rider PhD, MS, OTR/L, MSCS,&nbsp;Kristin A. Valdes OTD, OTR, CHT","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2023.08.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Proprioception of the elbow is necessary for daily activities. Proprioception can be impaired with </span>injury<span> or pathology, and rehabilitation efforts seek to improve proprioception for improved upper extremity functioning. In clinical practice, joint position sense (JPS) testing is often utilized to assess conscious proprioception; however, varying methods exist with little evidence of psychometric properties, especially for the elbow.</span></p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The primary aim of this study was to create a standardized elbow JPS test protocol using goniometry measurement to determine the most reliable testing position. The secondary aim was to determine if the elbow JPS test had acceptable test-retest reliability in healthy adults.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>This was a cross-sectional study using a convenience sample of healthy adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three elbow positions (45°, 60°, and 75° of elbow flexion) were measured twice on the same day by a single rater using a universal goniometer<span>. We calculated the absolute error in degrees between each position and reposition and the intraclass correlation coefficient (3,1) for relative reliability. We also calculated the standard error of the measurement and visually inspected Bland-Altman plots for absolute reliability.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-eight healthy adults (mean age 27.9 years, standard deviation 8.59) were assessed. The mean absolute error for all positions for test and retest was 5.7°. The intraclass correlation coefficients were moderate to good (0.57-0.75), and the standard error of the measurement was 2° (rounded) for all positions. The limits of agreement were moderately narrow, and the Bland-Altman plots showed a random distribution of errors for each position, indicating clinically acceptable measurement error.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The joint position reproduction test for JPS using goniometry demonstrated moderate to good test-retest reliability and acceptable measurement error in healthy adults. The elbow joint angle of 60° flexion was the most reliable for JPS testing, providing insight for JPS assessment in clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":"37 2","pages":"Pages 243-249"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test-retest reliability of joint position sense in the elbow among healthy adults\",\"authors\":\"John V. Rider PhD, MS, OTR/L, MSCS,&nbsp;Kristin A. Valdes OTD, OTR, CHT\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jht.2023.08.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Proprioception of the elbow is necessary for daily activities. Proprioception can be impaired with </span>injury<span> or pathology, and rehabilitation efforts seek to improve proprioception for improved upper extremity functioning. In clinical practice, joint position sense (JPS) testing is often utilized to assess conscious proprioception; however, varying methods exist with little evidence of psychometric properties, especially for the elbow.</span></p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The primary aim of this study was to create a standardized elbow JPS test protocol using goniometry measurement to determine the most reliable testing position. The secondary aim was to determine if the elbow JPS test had acceptable test-retest reliability in healthy adults.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>This was a cross-sectional study using a convenience sample of healthy adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three elbow positions (45°, 60°, and 75° of elbow flexion) were measured twice on the same day by a single rater using a universal goniometer<span>. We calculated the absolute error in degrees between each position and reposition and the intraclass correlation coefficient (3,1) for relative reliability. We also calculated the standard error of the measurement and visually inspected Bland-Altman plots for absolute reliability.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-eight healthy adults (mean age 27.9 years, standard deviation 8.59) were assessed. The mean absolute error for all positions for test and retest was 5.7°. The intraclass correlation coefficients were moderate to good (0.57-0.75), and the standard error of the measurement was 2° (rounded) for all positions. The limits of agreement were moderately narrow, and the Bland-Altman plots showed a random distribution of errors for each position, indicating clinically acceptable measurement error.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The joint position reproduction test for JPS using goniometry demonstrated moderate to good test-retest reliability and acceptable measurement error in healthy adults. The elbow joint angle of 60° flexion was the most reliable for JPS testing, providing insight for JPS assessment in clinical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"volume\":\"37 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 243-249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894113023001266\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894113023001266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肘部本体感觉是日常活动所必需的。本体感觉可能因损伤或病理而受损,康复工作旨在改善本体感觉,以改善上肢功能。在临床实践中,关节位置感(JPS)测试经常用于评估意识本体感觉;然而,存在着各种各样的方法,几乎没有证据表明心理测量特性,尤其是对肘部。目的:本研究的主要目的是创建一个标准化的肘部JPS测试方案,使用测角测量来确定最可靠的测试位置。第二个目的是确定肘部JPS测试在健康成年人中是否具有可接受的重新测试可靠性。研究设计:这是一项横断面研究,使用了健康成年人的方便样本。方法:在同一天用一台万能角度计测量三个肘部位置(肘部弯曲45°、60°和75°)两次。我们计算了每个位置和重新定位之间的绝对误差(以度为单位),以及相对可靠性的组内相关系数(3,1)。我们还计算了测量的标准误差,并目视检查了Bland-Altman图的绝对可靠性。结果:68名健康成年人(平均年龄27.9岁,标准差8.59)接受了评估。测试和重新测试的所有位置的平均绝对误差为5.7°。组内相关系数为中等至良好(0.57-0.75),所有位置的测量标准误差为2°(四舍五入)。一致性界限适度狭窄,Bland-Altman图显示每个位置的误差随机分布,表明临床可接受的测量误差。结论:在健康成年人中,使用测角术进行JPS的联合位置再现测试显示出中等至良好的重测可靠性和可接受的测量误差。60°屈曲的肘关节角度是JPS测试最可靠的,为临床实践中的JPS评估提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Test-retest reliability of joint position sense in the elbow among healthy adults

Background

Proprioception of the elbow is necessary for daily activities. Proprioception can be impaired with injury or pathology, and rehabilitation efforts seek to improve proprioception for improved upper extremity functioning. In clinical practice, joint position sense (JPS) testing is often utilized to assess conscious proprioception; however, varying methods exist with little evidence of psychometric properties, especially for the elbow.

Purpose

The primary aim of this study was to create a standardized elbow JPS test protocol using goniometry measurement to determine the most reliable testing position. The secondary aim was to determine if the elbow JPS test had acceptable test-retest reliability in healthy adults.

Study Design

This was a cross-sectional study using a convenience sample of healthy adults.

Methods

Three elbow positions (45°, 60°, and 75° of elbow flexion) were measured twice on the same day by a single rater using a universal goniometer. We calculated the absolute error in degrees between each position and reposition and the intraclass correlation coefficient (3,1) for relative reliability. We also calculated the standard error of the measurement and visually inspected Bland-Altman plots for absolute reliability.

Results

Sixty-eight healthy adults (mean age 27.9 years, standard deviation 8.59) were assessed. The mean absolute error for all positions for test and retest was 5.7°. The intraclass correlation coefficients were moderate to good (0.57-0.75), and the standard error of the measurement was 2° (rounded) for all positions. The limits of agreement were moderately narrow, and the Bland-Altman plots showed a random distribution of errors for each position, indicating clinically acceptable measurement error.

Conclusions

The joint position reproduction test for JPS using goniometry demonstrated moderate to good test-retest reliability and acceptable measurement error in healthy adults. The elbow joint angle of 60° flexion was the most reliable for JPS testing, providing insight for JPS assessment in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信