再手术过程中中央与外周插管:倾向性得分匹配分析。

Zihni Mert Duman, Ersin Kadiroğulları, Mustafa Can Kaplan, Barış Timur, Aylin Başgöze, Emre Yaşar, Muhammed Bayram, Ünal Aydın, Burak Onan
{"title":"再手术过程中中央与外周插管:倾向性得分匹配分析。","authors":"Zihni Mert Duman,&nbsp;Ersin Kadiroğulları,&nbsp;Mustafa Can Kaplan,&nbsp;Barış Timur,&nbsp;Aylin Başgöze,&nbsp;Emre Yaşar,&nbsp;Muhammed Bayram,&nbsp;Ünal Aydın,&nbsp;Burak Onan","doi":"10.21470/1678-9741-2022-0463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative outcomes and early mortality of peripheral and central cannulation techniques in cardiac reoperations using propensity score matching analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort, patients who underwent cardiac reoperations with median resternotomy were analyzed in terms of propensity score matching. Between November 2010 and September 2020, 257 patients underwent cardiac reoperations via central (Group 1) or peripheral (Group 2) cannulation. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to balance the influence of potential confounding factors to compare postoperative data and mortality rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences when comparing the matched groups regarding early mortality (P=0.51), major cardiac injury (P=0.99), prolonged ventilation (P=0.16), and postoperative stroke (P=0.99). The development of acute renal failure (P=0.02) was statistically less frequent in Group 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Performing cardiopulmonary bypass via peripheral cannulation increases acute renal failure in cardiac reoperations. In contrast, peripheral or central cannulation have similar early mortality rate in cardiac reoperations.</p>","PeriodicalId":72457,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Central vs. Peripheral Cannulation During Reoperations: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zihni Mert Duman,&nbsp;Ersin Kadiroğulları,&nbsp;Mustafa Can Kaplan,&nbsp;Barış Timur,&nbsp;Aylin Başgöze,&nbsp;Emre Yaşar,&nbsp;Muhammed Bayram,&nbsp;Ünal Aydın,&nbsp;Burak Onan\",\"doi\":\"10.21470/1678-9741-2022-0463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative outcomes and early mortality of peripheral and central cannulation techniques in cardiac reoperations using propensity score matching analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort, patients who underwent cardiac reoperations with median resternotomy were analyzed in terms of propensity score matching. Between November 2010 and September 2020, 257 patients underwent cardiac reoperations via central (Group 1) or peripheral (Group 2) cannulation. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to balance the influence of potential confounding factors to compare postoperative data and mortality rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences when comparing the matched groups regarding early mortality (P=0.51), major cardiac injury (P=0.99), prolonged ventilation (P=0.16), and postoperative stroke (P=0.99). The development of acute renal failure (P=0.02) was statistically less frequent in Group 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Performing cardiopulmonary bypass via peripheral cannulation increases acute renal failure in cardiac reoperations. In contrast, peripheral or central cannulation have similar early mortality rate in cardiac reoperations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550105/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2022-0463\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2022-0463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:本研究的目的是使用倾向评分匹配分析比较心脏再次手术中外周和中心插管技术的术后结果和早期死亡率。方法:在这一回顾性队列中,根据倾向评分匹配对接受正中再狭窄术的心脏再次手术的患者进行分析。2010年11月至2020年9月,257名患者通过中心(第1组)或外周(第2组)插管接受了心脏再次手术。进行1:1倾向评分匹配,以平衡潜在混杂因素的影响,比较术后数据和死亡率。结果:在早期死亡率(P=0.51)、严重心脏损伤(P=0.99)、延长通气时间(P=0.16)、,和术后卒中(P=0.99)。第1组发生急性肾衰竭(P=0.02)的频率在统计学上较低。结论:通过外周插管进行体外循环会增加心脏再次手术中的急性肾衰竭。相比之下,外周或中心插管在心脏再次手术中具有相似的早期死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Central vs. Peripheral Cannulation During Reoperations: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Central vs. Peripheral Cannulation During Reoperations: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Introduction: The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative outcomes and early mortality of peripheral and central cannulation techniques in cardiac reoperations using propensity score matching analysis.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort, patients who underwent cardiac reoperations with median resternotomy were analyzed in terms of propensity score matching. Between November 2010 and September 2020, 257 patients underwent cardiac reoperations via central (Group 1) or peripheral (Group 2) cannulation. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to balance the influence of potential confounding factors to compare postoperative data and mortality rate.

Results: There were no significant differences when comparing the matched groups regarding early mortality (P=0.51), major cardiac injury (P=0.99), prolonged ventilation (P=0.16), and postoperative stroke (P=0.99). The development of acute renal failure (P=0.02) was statistically less frequent in Group 1.

Conclusions: Performing cardiopulmonary bypass via peripheral cannulation increases acute renal failure in cardiac reoperations. In contrast, peripheral or central cannulation have similar early mortality rate in cardiac reoperations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信