以肺科和危重症医学以及危重症医学研究员为目标的基于标准化模拟的机械通气试点课程。

Avicenna Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2023-10-03 eCollection Date: 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1773792
Amina Pervaiz, Asil Daoud, Abdulrazak Alchakaki, Shyam Ganti, Divya Venkat, Sarah Lee, Abdulghani Sankari
{"title":"以肺科和危重症医学以及危重症医学研究员为目标的基于标准化模拟的机械通气试点课程。","authors":"Amina Pervaiz,&nbsp;Asil Daoud,&nbsp;Abdulrazak Alchakaki,&nbsp;Shyam Ganti,&nbsp;Divya Venkat,&nbsp;Sarah Lee,&nbsp;Abdulghani Sankari","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1773792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  The mastery of mechanical ventilation (MV) management is challenging, as it requires the integration of physiological and technological knowledge with critical thinking. Our aim was to create a standardized curriculum with assessment tools based on evidence-based practices to identify the skill deficit and improve knowledge in MV management. <b>Methods</b>  For 3 years, 3 hours of standardized curriculum for each first-year pulmonary critical care medicine (PCCM) and critical care medicine (CCM) fellows was integrated into the orientation (chronologically): (1) a baseline knowledge pretest; (2) a 1-hour one-on-one case-based simulation session with debriefing. A 34-item competency checklist was used to assess critically thinking and skills and guide the debriefing; (3) a 1-hour group didactic on respiratory mechanics and physiology; (4) a 45-minute hands-on session in small groups of one to three fellows for basic knobology, waveforms, and various modes of mechanical ventilators; (5) a 15-minute group bedside teaching of vented patients covering topics such as techniques to alleviate dyssynchrony and advanced ventilator modes; (6) a one-on-one simulation reassessment session; (7) a knowledge posttest. Fellows' performances at baseline, 1-month posttest, and end-of-first year post-test were compared. <b>Results</b>  Fellows ( <i>n</i>  = 24) demonstrated significant improvement at 1-month posttest in knowledge (54.2% ± 11.0 vs. 76.6 ± 11.7%, <i>p</i>  < 0.001) and MV competency (40.7 ± 11.0% vs. 69.7 ± 9.3%, <i>p</i>  < 0.001), compared with pretest. These improvements were retained at the end-of-year reassessments (knowledge 75.1 ± 14.5% and MV competency 85.5 ± 8.7%; <i>p</i>  < 0.001). <b>Conclusion</b>  Standardized simulation-based MV curriculum may improve the medical knowledge competency, and confidence of first-year PCCM and CCM fellows toward MV management before encountering actual ventilated patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":32889,"journal":{"name":"Avicenna Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550363/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pilot Standardized Simulation-Based Mechanical Ventilation Curriculum Targeting Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Critical Care Medicine Fellows.\",\"authors\":\"Amina Pervaiz,&nbsp;Asil Daoud,&nbsp;Abdulrazak Alchakaki,&nbsp;Shyam Ganti,&nbsp;Divya Venkat,&nbsp;Sarah Lee,&nbsp;Abdulghani Sankari\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1773792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  The mastery of mechanical ventilation (MV) management is challenging, as it requires the integration of physiological and technological knowledge with critical thinking. Our aim was to create a standardized curriculum with assessment tools based on evidence-based practices to identify the skill deficit and improve knowledge in MV management. <b>Methods</b>  For 3 years, 3 hours of standardized curriculum for each first-year pulmonary critical care medicine (PCCM) and critical care medicine (CCM) fellows was integrated into the orientation (chronologically): (1) a baseline knowledge pretest; (2) a 1-hour one-on-one case-based simulation session with debriefing. A 34-item competency checklist was used to assess critically thinking and skills and guide the debriefing; (3) a 1-hour group didactic on respiratory mechanics and physiology; (4) a 45-minute hands-on session in small groups of one to three fellows for basic knobology, waveforms, and various modes of mechanical ventilators; (5) a 15-minute group bedside teaching of vented patients covering topics such as techniques to alleviate dyssynchrony and advanced ventilator modes; (6) a one-on-one simulation reassessment session; (7) a knowledge posttest. Fellows' performances at baseline, 1-month posttest, and end-of-first year post-test were compared. <b>Results</b>  Fellows ( <i>n</i>  = 24) demonstrated significant improvement at 1-month posttest in knowledge (54.2% ± 11.0 vs. 76.6 ± 11.7%, <i>p</i>  < 0.001) and MV competency (40.7 ± 11.0% vs. 69.7 ± 9.3%, <i>p</i>  < 0.001), compared with pretest. These improvements were retained at the end-of-year reassessments (knowledge 75.1 ± 14.5% and MV competency 85.5 ± 8.7%; <i>p</i>  < 0.001). <b>Conclusion</b>  Standardized simulation-based MV curriculum may improve the medical knowledge competency, and confidence of first-year PCCM and CCM fellows toward MV management before encountering actual ventilated patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avicenna Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550363/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avicenna Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1773792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avicenna Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1773792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍 掌握机械通气(MV)管理具有挑战性,因为它需要将生理和技术知识与批判性思维相结合。我们的目标是创建一个标准化的课程,其中包含基于循证实践的评估工具,以确定MV管理中的技能缺陷并提高知识。方法 3年,3 每个一年级肺重症医学(PCCM)和重症医学(CCM)研究员的标准化课程时数被纳入定向(按时间顺序):(1)基线知识预测试;(2) 1小时一对一的基于案例的模拟会议,并进行汇报。34项能力检查表用于评估批判性思维和技能,并指导汇报;(3) 一个1小时的呼吸力学和生理学小组教学;(4) 以一至三名研究员为一小组,进行45分钟的实践课程,学习基础知识、波形和各种机械通气模式;(5) 对通气患者进行15分钟的床边分组教学,内容包括缓解不同步的技术和先进的呼吸机模式;(6) 一对一模拟重新评估会议;(7) 知识后测。研究人员在基线、1个月后测试和第一年后测试结束时的表现进行了比较。后果 研究员(n = 24)在1个月后的知识测试中表现出显著改善(54.2% ± 11.0对76.6 ± 11.7%,p p p 结论 基于标准化模拟的MV课程可以提高一年级PCCM和CCM研究员在遇到实际通气患者之前对MV管理的医学知识能力和信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Pilot Standardized Simulation-Based Mechanical Ventilation Curriculum Targeting Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Critical Care Medicine Fellows.

A Pilot Standardized Simulation-Based Mechanical Ventilation Curriculum Targeting Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Critical Care Medicine Fellows.

A Pilot Standardized Simulation-Based Mechanical Ventilation Curriculum Targeting Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Critical Care Medicine Fellows.

A Pilot Standardized Simulation-Based Mechanical Ventilation Curriculum Targeting Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Critical Care Medicine Fellows.

Introduction  The mastery of mechanical ventilation (MV) management is challenging, as it requires the integration of physiological and technological knowledge with critical thinking. Our aim was to create a standardized curriculum with assessment tools based on evidence-based practices to identify the skill deficit and improve knowledge in MV management. Methods  For 3 years, 3 hours of standardized curriculum for each first-year pulmonary critical care medicine (PCCM) and critical care medicine (CCM) fellows was integrated into the orientation (chronologically): (1) a baseline knowledge pretest; (2) a 1-hour one-on-one case-based simulation session with debriefing. A 34-item competency checklist was used to assess critically thinking and skills and guide the debriefing; (3) a 1-hour group didactic on respiratory mechanics and physiology; (4) a 45-minute hands-on session in small groups of one to three fellows for basic knobology, waveforms, and various modes of mechanical ventilators; (5) a 15-minute group bedside teaching of vented patients covering topics such as techniques to alleviate dyssynchrony and advanced ventilator modes; (6) a one-on-one simulation reassessment session; (7) a knowledge posttest. Fellows' performances at baseline, 1-month posttest, and end-of-first year post-test were compared. Results  Fellows ( n  = 24) demonstrated significant improvement at 1-month posttest in knowledge (54.2% ± 11.0 vs. 76.6 ± 11.7%, p  < 0.001) and MV competency (40.7 ± 11.0% vs. 69.7 ± 9.3%, p  < 0.001), compared with pretest. These improvements were retained at the end-of-year reassessments (knowledge 75.1 ± 14.5% and MV competency 85.5 ± 8.7%; p  < 0.001). Conclusion  Standardized simulation-based MV curriculum may improve the medical knowledge competency, and confidence of first-year PCCM and CCM fellows toward MV management before encountering actual ventilated patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信