Semra Ozdemir, Jia Jia Lee, Khung Keong Yeo, Kheng Leng David Sim, Eric Andrew Finkelstein, Chetna Malhotra
{"title":"心力衰竭患者医疗决策作用及其与患者特征和患者报告结果的相关性的前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Semra Ozdemir, Jia Jia Lee, Khung Keong Yeo, Kheng Leng David Sim, Eric Andrew Finkelstein, Chetna Malhotra","doi":"10.1177/0272989X231201609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Among patients with heart failure (HF), we examined 1) the evolution of patient involvement in decision making over 2 y, 2) the association of patient characteristics with decision-making roles, and 3) the association of decision-making roles with distress, spiritual well-being, and quality of physician communication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered the survey every 4 mo over 24 mo to patients with New York Heart Association class 3/4 symptoms recruited from inpatient clinics. The decision-making roles were categorized as no patient involvement, physician/family-led, joint (with family and/or physicians), patient-led, or patient-alone decision making. The associations between patient characteristics and decision-making roles were assessed using a mixed-effects ordered logistic regression, whereas those between patient outcomes and decision-making roles were investigated using mixed-effects linear regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 557 patients invited, 251 participated in the study. The most common roles in decision making at baseline assessment were \"no involvement\" (27.53%) and \"patient-alone decision making\" (25.10%). The proportions of different decision-making roles did not change over 2 y (<i>P</i> = 0.37). Older age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.97; <i>P</i> = 0.003) and being married (OR = 0.63; <i>P</i> = 0.035) were associated with lower involvement in decision making. Chinese ethnicity (OR = 1.91; <i>P</i> = 0.003), higher education (OR = 1.87; <i>P</i> = 0.003), awareness of terminal condition (OR = 2.00; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and adequate self-care confidence (OR = 1.74; <i>P</i> < 0.001) were associated with greater involvement. Compared with no patient involvement, joint (β = -0.58; <i>P</i> = 0.026) and patient-led (β = -0.59; <i>P</i> = 0.014) decision making were associated with lower distress, while family/physician-led (β = 4.37; <i>P</i> = 0.001), joint (β = 3.86; <i>P</i> < 0.001), patient-led (β = 3.46; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and patient-alone (β = 3.99; <i>P</i> < 0.001) decision making were associated with better spiritual well-being.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A substantial proportion of patients was not involved in decision making. Patients should be encouraged to participate in decision making since it is associated with lower distress and better spiritual well-being.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>The level of involvement in medical decision making did not change over time among patients with heart failure. A substantial proportion of patients were not involved in decision making throughout the 24-mo study period.Patients' involvement in decision making varied by age, ethnicity, education level, marital status, awareness of the terminal condition, and confidence in self-care.Compared with no patient involvement in decision making, joint and patient-led decision making were associated with lower distress, and any level of patient involvement in decision making was associated with better spiritual well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":49839,"journal":{"name":"Medical Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":"863-874"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective Cohort Study of Medical Decision-Making Roles and Their Associations with Patient Characteristics and Patient-Reported Outcomes among Patients with Heart Failure.\",\"authors\":\"Semra Ozdemir, Jia Jia Lee, Khung Keong Yeo, Kheng Leng David Sim, Eric Andrew Finkelstein, Chetna Malhotra\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0272989X231201609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Among patients with heart failure (HF), we examined 1) the evolution of patient involvement in decision making over 2 y, 2) the association of patient characteristics with decision-making roles, and 3) the association of decision-making roles with distress, spiritual well-being, and quality of physician communication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered the survey every 4 mo over 24 mo to patients with New York Heart Association class 3/4 symptoms recruited from inpatient clinics. The decision-making roles were categorized as no patient involvement, physician/family-led, joint (with family and/or physicians), patient-led, or patient-alone decision making. The associations between patient characteristics and decision-making roles were assessed using a mixed-effects ordered logistic regression, whereas those between patient outcomes and decision-making roles were investigated using mixed-effects linear regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 557 patients invited, 251 participated in the study. The most common roles in decision making at baseline assessment were \\\"no involvement\\\" (27.53%) and \\\"patient-alone decision making\\\" (25.10%). The proportions of different decision-making roles did not change over 2 y (<i>P</i> = 0.37). Older age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.97; <i>P</i> = 0.003) and being married (OR = 0.63; <i>P</i> = 0.035) were associated with lower involvement in decision making. Chinese ethnicity (OR = 1.91; <i>P</i> = 0.003), higher education (OR = 1.87; <i>P</i> = 0.003), awareness of terminal condition (OR = 2.00; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and adequate self-care confidence (OR = 1.74; <i>P</i> < 0.001) were associated with greater involvement. Compared with no patient involvement, joint (β = -0.58; <i>P</i> = 0.026) and patient-led (β = -0.59; <i>P</i> = 0.014) decision making were associated with lower distress, while family/physician-led (β = 4.37; <i>P</i> = 0.001), joint (β = 3.86; <i>P</i> < 0.001), patient-led (β = 3.46; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and patient-alone (β = 3.99; <i>P</i> < 0.001) decision making were associated with better spiritual well-being.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A substantial proportion of patients was not involved in decision making. Patients should be encouraged to participate in decision making since it is associated with lower distress and better spiritual well-being.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>The level of involvement in medical decision making did not change over time among patients with heart failure. A substantial proportion of patients were not involved in decision making throughout the 24-mo study period.Patients' involvement in decision making varied by age, ethnicity, education level, marital status, awareness of the terminal condition, and confidence in self-care.Compared with no patient involvement in decision making, joint and patient-led decision making were associated with lower distress, and any level of patient involvement in decision making was associated with better spiritual well-being.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Decision Making\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"863-874\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X231201609\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X231201609","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在心力衰竭(HF)患者中,我们研究了1)2年来患者参与决策的演变,2)患者特征与决策角色的关系,以及3)决策角色与痛苦、精神健康和医生沟通质量的关系。方法:我们每4年进行一次调查 莫超过24 mo至从住院诊所招募的具有纽约心脏协会3/4级症状的患者。决策角色分为无患者参与、医生/家庭主导、联合(与家人和/或医生)、患者主导或患者单独决策。使用混合效应有序逻辑回归评估患者特征与决策角色之间的关联,而使用混合效应线性回归调查患者结果与决策角色间的关联。结果:在557名受邀患者中,251人参与了这项研究。在基线评估中,决策中最常见的角色是“无参与”(27.53%)和“患者单独决策”(25.10%)。不同决策角色的比例在2年内没有变化(P = 0.37)。年龄较大(比值比[OR] = 0.97;P = 0.003)并结婚(或 = 0.63;P = 0.035)与决策参与度较低有关。华裔(或 = 1.91;P = 0.003),高等教育(OR = 1.87;P = 0.003),意识到终端条件(OR = 2.00;P P P = 0.026)和患者主导(β = -0.59;P = 0.014)决策与较低的痛苦相关,而家庭/医生主导的(β = 4.37;P = 0.001),关节(β = 3.86;P P P 结论:相当一部分患者没有参与决策。应该鼓励患者参与决策,因为这与较低的痛苦和更好的精神健康有关。亮点:心力衰竭患者参与医疗决策的程度没有随着时间的推移而改变。在整个24个月的研究期间,很大一部分患者没有参与决策。患者参与决策的程度因年龄、种族、教育水平、婚姻状况、对晚期疾病的认识和自我护理的信心而异。与没有患者参与决策相比,联合和患者主导的决策与较低的痛苦相关,任何程度的患者参与决策都与更好的精神健康相关。
A Prospective Cohort Study of Medical Decision-Making Roles and Their Associations with Patient Characteristics and Patient-Reported Outcomes among Patients with Heart Failure.
Objective: Among patients with heart failure (HF), we examined 1) the evolution of patient involvement in decision making over 2 y, 2) the association of patient characteristics with decision-making roles, and 3) the association of decision-making roles with distress, spiritual well-being, and quality of physician communication.
Methods: We administered the survey every 4 mo over 24 mo to patients with New York Heart Association class 3/4 symptoms recruited from inpatient clinics. The decision-making roles were categorized as no patient involvement, physician/family-led, joint (with family and/or physicians), patient-led, or patient-alone decision making. The associations between patient characteristics and decision-making roles were assessed using a mixed-effects ordered logistic regression, whereas those between patient outcomes and decision-making roles were investigated using mixed-effects linear regressions.
Results: Of the 557 patients invited, 251 participated in the study. The most common roles in decision making at baseline assessment were "no involvement" (27.53%) and "patient-alone decision making" (25.10%). The proportions of different decision-making roles did not change over 2 y (P = 0.37). Older age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.97; P = 0.003) and being married (OR = 0.63; P = 0.035) were associated with lower involvement in decision making. Chinese ethnicity (OR = 1.91; P = 0.003), higher education (OR = 1.87; P = 0.003), awareness of terminal condition (OR = 2.00; P < 0.001), and adequate self-care confidence (OR = 1.74; P < 0.001) were associated with greater involvement. Compared with no patient involvement, joint (β = -0.58; P = 0.026) and patient-led (β = -0.59; P = 0.014) decision making were associated with lower distress, while family/physician-led (β = 4.37; P = 0.001), joint (β = 3.86; P < 0.001), patient-led (β = 3.46; P < 0.001), and patient-alone (β = 3.99; P < 0.001) decision making were associated with better spiritual well-being.
Conclusion: A substantial proportion of patients was not involved in decision making. Patients should be encouraged to participate in decision making since it is associated with lower distress and better spiritual well-being.
Highlights: The level of involvement in medical decision making did not change over time among patients with heart failure. A substantial proportion of patients were not involved in decision making throughout the 24-mo study period.Patients' involvement in decision making varied by age, ethnicity, education level, marital status, awareness of the terminal condition, and confidence in self-care.Compared with no patient involvement in decision making, joint and patient-led decision making were associated with lower distress, and any level of patient involvement in decision making was associated with better spiritual well-being.
期刊介绍:
Medical Decision Making offers rigorous and systematic approaches to decision making that are designed to improve the health and clinical care of individuals and to assist with health care policy development. Using the fundamentals of decision analysis and theory, economic evaluation, and evidence based quality assessment, Medical Decision Making presents both theoretical and practical statistical and modeling techniques and methods from a variety of disciplines.