日本神经血管内治疗学会神经介入模拟训练问卷调查。

Journal of neuroendovascular therapy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-21 DOI:10.5797/jnet.ra.2022-0062
Yuki Ebisudani, Kenji Sugiu, Satoshi Murai, Jun Haruma, Masafumi Hiramatsu, Tomohito Hishikawa, Isao Date
{"title":"日本神经血管内治疗学会神经介入模拟训练问卷调查。","authors":"Yuki Ebisudani,&nbsp;Kenji Sugiu,&nbsp;Satoshi Murai,&nbsp;Jun Haruma,&nbsp;Masafumi Hiramatsu,&nbsp;Tomohito Hishikawa,&nbsp;Isao Date","doi":"10.5797/jnet.ra.2022-0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Simulation training has focused on education and practical training. However, the adoption rate of neurointerventional simulation training in Japan is unknown. Therefore, we sent a questionnaire survey form to consulting specialists from the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy (JSNET) to clarify the actual simulation training situation and compare the differences between university hospitals and general hospitals in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The questionnaire survey was conducted in 243 neurosurgical training facilities that had JSNET consulting specialists between May 31, 2021 and July 31, 2021. The questionnaire survey forms were distributed by Google Forms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 162 facilities responded to the survey (response rate: 66.7%; 35.2% from university hospitals and 64.8% from general hospitals). The adoption rate for simulation training was 53.7%, and it was significantly higher in the university hospitals than in the general hospitals (64.9% vs. 47.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.035). On the simulation effectiveness survey, more than 80% of respondents answered that the simulation training was a useful tool for upskill training. The open-ended question on interventional simulation training showed that there are limiting factors such as financial constraints. Additionally, respondents expressed a desire for a standard neurointerventional simulation training and education program.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adoption rate for simulation training was 53.7% in the training facilities of JSNET, and it was higher in the university hospitals than in the general hospitals. Most of the respondents answered that simulation training is an effective tool to improve neurointerventional skills. They also requested the establishment of simulation training programs and simulation tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":73856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy","volume":"17 9","pages":"181-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/51/2e/jnet-17-181.PMC10508991.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Questionnaire Survey of Neurointerventional Simulation Training in the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Ebisudani,&nbsp;Kenji Sugiu,&nbsp;Satoshi Murai,&nbsp;Jun Haruma,&nbsp;Masafumi Hiramatsu,&nbsp;Tomohito Hishikawa,&nbsp;Isao Date\",\"doi\":\"10.5797/jnet.ra.2022-0062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Simulation training has focused on education and practical training. However, the adoption rate of neurointerventional simulation training in Japan is unknown. Therefore, we sent a questionnaire survey form to consulting specialists from the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy (JSNET) to clarify the actual simulation training situation and compare the differences between university hospitals and general hospitals in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The questionnaire survey was conducted in 243 neurosurgical training facilities that had JSNET consulting specialists between May 31, 2021 and July 31, 2021. The questionnaire survey forms were distributed by Google Forms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 162 facilities responded to the survey (response rate: 66.7%; 35.2% from university hospitals and 64.8% from general hospitals). The adoption rate for simulation training was 53.7%, and it was significantly higher in the university hospitals than in the general hospitals (64.9% vs. 47.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.035). On the simulation effectiveness survey, more than 80% of respondents answered that the simulation training was a useful tool for upskill training. The open-ended question on interventional simulation training showed that there are limiting factors such as financial constraints. Additionally, respondents expressed a desire for a standard neurointerventional simulation training and education program.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adoption rate for simulation training was 53.7% in the training facilities of JSNET, and it was higher in the university hospitals than in the general hospitals. Most of the respondents answered that simulation training is an effective tool to improve neurointerventional skills. They also requested the establishment of simulation training programs and simulation tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy\",\"volume\":\"17 9\",\"pages\":\"181-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/51/2e/jnet-17-181.PMC10508991.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.ra.2022-0062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.ra.2022-0062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:模拟培训侧重于教育和实践培训。然而,神经介入模拟训练在日本的采用率尚不清楚。因此我们向日本神经血管内治疗学会(JSNET)的咨询专家发送了一份问卷调查表,以澄清实际的模拟培训情况,并比较日本大学医院和综合医院之间的差异。方法:在243家拥有JSNET咨询专家的神经外科培训机构进行问卷调查2021年5月31日至2021年7月31日期间。问卷调查表由谷歌表格分发。结果:共有162家机构对调查做出了回应(回复率:66.7%;35.2%来自大学医院,64.8%来自综合医院)。模拟培训的采用率为53.7%,大学医院的采用率明显高于综合医院(64.9%对47.6%,p=0.035)。在模拟效果调查中,超过80%的受访者回答模拟培训是提高技能培训的有用工具。关于介入模拟训练的开放式问题表明,存在资金限制等限制因素。此外,受访者表示希望有一个标准的神经介入模拟培训和教育计划。结论:在JSNET的培训设施中,模拟培训的采用率为53.7%,大学医院的采用率高于综合医院。大多数受访者回答说,模拟训练是提高神经介入技能的有效工具。他们还要求建立模拟训练计划和模拟工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Questionnaire Survey of Neurointerventional Simulation Training in the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy.

Questionnaire Survey of Neurointerventional Simulation Training in the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy.

Questionnaire Survey of Neurointerventional Simulation Training in the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy.

Objective: Simulation training has focused on education and practical training. However, the adoption rate of neurointerventional simulation training in Japan is unknown. Therefore, we sent a questionnaire survey form to consulting specialists from the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy (JSNET) to clarify the actual simulation training situation and compare the differences between university hospitals and general hospitals in Japan.

Methods: The questionnaire survey was conducted in 243 neurosurgical training facilities that had JSNET consulting specialists between May 31, 2021 and July 31, 2021. The questionnaire survey forms were distributed by Google Forms.

Results: A total of 162 facilities responded to the survey (response rate: 66.7%; 35.2% from university hospitals and 64.8% from general hospitals). The adoption rate for simulation training was 53.7%, and it was significantly higher in the university hospitals than in the general hospitals (64.9% vs. 47.6%, p = 0.035). On the simulation effectiveness survey, more than 80% of respondents answered that the simulation training was a useful tool for upskill training. The open-ended question on interventional simulation training showed that there are limiting factors such as financial constraints. Additionally, respondents expressed a desire for a standard neurointerventional simulation training and education program.

Conclusion: The adoption rate for simulation training was 53.7% in the training facilities of JSNET, and it was higher in the university hospitals than in the general hospitals. Most of the respondents answered that simulation training is an effective tool to improve neurointerventional skills. They also requested the establishment of simulation training programs and simulation tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信