一例先前失败的根管穿孔修复的Geristore和深度上皮化牙龈移植物的治疗:一例5年随访病例报告。

Pub Date : 2023-09-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/7335196
Talal M Zahid
{"title":"一例先前失败的根管穿孔修复的Geristore和深度上皮化牙龈移植物的治疗:一例5年随访病例报告。","authors":"Talal M Zahid","doi":"10.1155/2023/7335196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Iatrogenic root perforation presents a significant management challenge for clinicians as it may seriously harm the periodontium. More specifically, perforations occurring relative to the crestal bone have a poor prognosis even after repair due to their proximity to the gingival tissues. The current literature reports the use of various materials for root perforation repair including calcium hydroxide, glass ionomer cement, amalgam, and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), to name a few. This case report describes the clinical management of a cervical perforation that occurred on the maxillary central incisor. The perforated area was initially repaired with MTA but failed after one year, which resulted in an active lesion at the midlabial aspect of the tooth. The case was subsequently treated using a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Geristore®) and deepithelialized free gingival graft (DGG). There were favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up. The use of DGG, however, led to some late complications such as gingival cul-de-sac and color discrepancy, which were later resolved with gingivoplasty and frenectomy. We thus conclude that Geristore® has the potential to be a better repair material than the existing ones for crestal and subcrestal root perforations.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of a Previously Failed Root Perforation Repair with Geristore and Deepithelialized Gingival Graft: A 5-Year Follow-Up Case Report.\",\"authors\":\"Talal M Zahid\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/7335196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Iatrogenic root perforation presents a significant management challenge for clinicians as it may seriously harm the periodontium. More specifically, perforations occurring relative to the crestal bone have a poor prognosis even after repair due to their proximity to the gingival tissues. The current literature reports the use of various materials for root perforation repair including calcium hydroxide, glass ionomer cement, amalgam, and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), to name a few. This case report describes the clinical management of a cervical perforation that occurred on the maxillary central incisor. The perforated area was initially repaired with MTA but failed after one year, which resulted in an active lesion at the midlabial aspect of the tooth. The case was subsequently treated using a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Geristore®) and deepithelialized free gingival graft (DGG). There were favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up. The use of DGG, however, led to some late complications such as gingival cul-de-sac and color discrepancy, which were later resolved with gingivoplasty and frenectomy. We thus conclude that Geristore® has the potential to be a better repair material than the existing ones for crestal and subcrestal root perforations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550458/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7335196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7335196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医源性牙根穿孔对临床医生来说是一个重大的管理挑战,因为它可能严重损害牙周组织。更具体地说,相对于冠骨发生的穿孔即使在修复后也具有较差的预后,因为它们靠近牙龈组织。目前的文献报道了各种材料用于根穿孔修复,包括氢氧化钙、玻璃离聚物水泥、汞合金和矿物三氧化二聚集体(MTA)等。本病例报告描述了发生在上颌中切牙的颈部穿孔的临床处理。穿孔区域最初用MTA修复,但一年后失败,导致牙齿中掌侧出现活动性病变。该病例随后使用树脂改性玻璃离聚物粘固剂(Geristore®)和深度上皮化游离牙龈移植物(DGG)进行治疗。在1年、3年和5年的随访中,有良好的临床和放射学结果。然而,DGG的使用导致了一些晚期并发症,如牙龈死胡同和颜色差异,这些并发症后来通过牙龈成形术和系带切除术得到解决。因此,我们得出的结论是,Geristore®有可能成为一种比现有的冠下根穿孔修复材料更好的修复材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Management of a Previously Failed Root Perforation Repair with Geristore and Deepithelialized Gingival Graft: A 5-Year Follow-Up Case Report.

Management of a Previously Failed Root Perforation Repair with Geristore and Deepithelialized Gingival Graft: A 5-Year Follow-Up Case Report.

Management of a Previously Failed Root Perforation Repair with Geristore and Deepithelialized Gingival Graft: A 5-Year Follow-Up Case Report.

分享
查看原文
Management of a Previously Failed Root Perforation Repair with Geristore and Deepithelialized Gingival Graft: A 5-Year Follow-Up Case Report.

Iatrogenic root perforation presents a significant management challenge for clinicians as it may seriously harm the periodontium. More specifically, perforations occurring relative to the crestal bone have a poor prognosis even after repair due to their proximity to the gingival tissues. The current literature reports the use of various materials for root perforation repair including calcium hydroxide, glass ionomer cement, amalgam, and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), to name a few. This case report describes the clinical management of a cervical perforation that occurred on the maxillary central incisor. The perforated area was initially repaired with MTA but failed after one year, which resulted in an active lesion at the midlabial aspect of the tooth. The case was subsequently treated using a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Geristore®) and deepithelialized free gingival graft (DGG). There were favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up. The use of DGG, however, led to some late complications such as gingival cul-de-sac and color discrepancy, which were later resolved with gingivoplasty and frenectomy. We thus conclude that Geristore® has the potential to be a better repair material than the existing ones for crestal and subcrestal root perforations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信