基因检测结果电子申报表内容和设计的患者建议:通过互联网访问基因检测结果的患者访谈研究。

JMIRx med Pub Date : 2022-05-31 DOI:10.2196/29706
Diane M Korngiebel, Kathleen McGlone West
{"title":"基因检测结果电子申报表内容和设计的患者建议:通过互联网访问基因检测结果的患者访谈研究。","authors":"Diane M Korngiebel,&nbsp;Kathleen McGlone West","doi":"10.2196/29706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genetic test results will be increasingly made available electronically as more patient-facing tools are developed; however, little research has been done that collects data on patient preferences for content and design before creating results templates.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study identifies patient preferences for the electronic return of genetic test results, including what considerations should be prioritized for content and design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following user-centered design methods, 59 interviews were conducted by using semistructured protocols. The interviews explored the content and design issues of patient portals that facilitated the return of test results to patients. We interviewed patients who received electronic results for specific types of genetics tests (pharmacogenetic tests, hereditary blood disorder tests, and tests for the risk of heritable cancers) or electronically received any type of genetic or nongenetic test results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In general, many of participants felt that there always needed to be some clinician involvement in electronic result returns and that electronic coversheets with simple summaries would be helpful for facilitating this. Coversheet summaries could accompany, but not replace, the more detailed report. Participants had specific suggestions for such results summaries, such as only reporting the information that was the most important for patients to understand, including next steps, and doing so by using clear language that is free of medical jargon. Electronic result returns should also include explicit encouragement for patients to contact health care providers about questions. Finally, many participants preferred to manage their care by using their smartphones, particularly in instances when they needed to access health information on the go.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants recommended that a patient-friendly front section should accompany the more detailed report and made suggestions for organization, content, and wording. Many used their smartphones regularly to access test results; therefore, health systems and patient portal software vendors should accommodate smartphone app design and web portal design concomitantly when developing platforms for returning results.</p>","PeriodicalId":73558,"journal":{"name":"JMIRx med","volume":"3 2","pages":"e29706"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414314/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet.\",\"authors\":\"Diane M Korngiebel,&nbsp;Kathleen McGlone West\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/29706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genetic test results will be increasingly made available electronically as more patient-facing tools are developed; however, little research has been done that collects data on patient preferences for content and design before creating results templates.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study identifies patient preferences for the electronic return of genetic test results, including what considerations should be prioritized for content and design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following user-centered design methods, 59 interviews were conducted by using semistructured protocols. The interviews explored the content and design issues of patient portals that facilitated the return of test results to patients. We interviewed patients who received electronic results for specific types of genetics tests (pharmacogenetic tests, hereditary blood disorder tests, and tests for the risk of heritable cancers) or electronically received any type of genetic or nongenetic test results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In general, many of participants felt that there always needed to be some clinician involvement in electronic result returns and that electronic coversheets with simple summaries would be helpful for facilitating this. Coversheet summaries could accompany, but not replace, the more detailed report. Participants had specific suggestions for such results summaries, such as only reporting the information that was the most important for patients to understand, including next steps, and doing so by using clear language that is free of medical jargon. Electronic result returns should also include explicit encouragement for patients to contact health care providers about questions. Finally, many participants preferred to manage their care by using their smartphones, particularly in instances when they needed to access health information on the go.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants recommended that a patient-friendly front section should accompany the more detailed report and made suggestions for organization, content, and wording. Many used their smartphones regularly to access test results; therefore, health systems and patient portal software vendors should accommodate smartphone app design and web portal design concomitantly when developing platforms for returning results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIRx med\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"e29706\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414314/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIRx med\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/29706\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIRx med","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/29706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:随着更多面向患者的工具的开发,基因检测结果将越来越多地以电子方式提供;然而,在创建结果模板之前,很少有研究收集患者对内容和设计的偏好数据。目的:本研究确定了患者对基因检测结果电子返回的偏好,包括内容和设计应优先考虑的因素。方法:采用以用户为中心的设计方法,采用半结构化协议进行59次访谈。访谈探讨了患者门户网站的内容和设计问题,这些门户网站有助于将测试结果返回给患者。我们采访了接受特定类型遗传学测试(药物遗传学测试、遗传性血液病测试和遗传性癌症风险测试)电子结果或接受任何类型遗传或非遗传测试结果的患者。结果:总的来说,许多参与者认为总是需要一些临床医生参与电子结果返回,带有简单摘要的电子封面将有助于促进这一点。封面摘要可以附在更详细的报告中,但不能取代它。参与者对这些结果摘要有具体的建议,例如只报告对患者来说最重要的信息,包括下一步行动,并使用不含医学术语的清晰语言。电子结果报告还应明确鼓励患者就问题联系医疗保健提供者。最后,许多参与者更喜欢使用智能手机来管理他们的护理,尤其是在他们需要随时随地访问健康信息的情况下。结论:参与者建议在更详细的报告中加入一个对患者友好的正面部分,并对组织、内容和措辞提出建议。许多人定期使用智能手机获取测试结果;因此,在开发返回结果的平台时,卫生系统和患者门户软件供应商应同时考虑智能手机应用程序设计和门户网站设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet.

Background: Genetic test results will be increasingly made available electronically as more patient-facing tools are developed; however, little research has been done that collects data on patient preferences for content and design before creating results templates.

Objective: This study identifies patient preferences for the electronic return of genetic test results, including what considerations should be prioritized for content and design.

Methods: Following user-centered design methods, 59 interviews were conducted by using semistructured protocols. The interviews explored the content and design issues of patient portals that facilitated the return of test results to patients. We interviewed patients who received electronic results for specific types of genetics tests (pharmacogenetic tests, hereditary blood disorder tests, and tests for the risk of heritable cancers) or electronically received any type of genetic or nongenetic test results.

Results: In general, many of participants felt that there always needed to be some clinician involvement in electronic result returns and that electronic coversheets with simple summaries would be helpful for facilitating this. Coversheet summaries could accompany, but not replace, the more detailed report. Participants had specific suggestions for such results summaries, such as only reporting the information that was the most important for patients to understand, including next steps, and doing so by using clear language that is free of medical jargon. Electronic result returns should also include explicit encouragement for patients to contact health care providers about questions. Finally, many participants preferred to manage their care by using their smartphones, particularly in instances when they needed to access health information on the go.

Conclusions: Participants recommended that a patient-friendly front section should accompany the more detailed report and made suggestions for organization, content, and wording. Many used their smartphones regularly to access test results; therefore, health systems and patient portal software vendors should accommodate smartphone app design and web portal design concomitantly when developing platforms for returning results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信