在刚果民主共和国金沙萨实施和评估世卫组织社区急救人员试点培训:一项混合方法研究

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Ken Diango , Eric Mafuta , Lee A. Wallis , Charmaine Cunningham , Peter Hodkinson
{"title":"在刚果民主共和国金沙萨实施和评估世卫组织社区急救人员试点培训:一项混合方法研究","authors":"Ken Diango ,&nbsp;Eric Mafuta ,&nbsp;Lee A. Wallis ,&nbsp;Charmaine Cunningham ,&nbsp;Peter Hodkinson","doi":"10.1016/j.afjem.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Prehospital care in many low- and middle-income countries is underdeveloped and needs strengthening for improved outcomes. Where formal prehospital care systems are under development, integration of a layperson first responder programme may help improve access for those in need. The World Health Organization recently developed the Community First Aid Responder (CFAR) learning program in support of this system, providing that it may require adaptation to be contextually suitable and sustainably implemented at country level. This study assesses a pilot WHO CFAR course in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo, to inform future rollouts and related research.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a 3-day in-person pilot CFAR training with 42 purposively selected community health workers. Data collection involved quantitative and qualitative phases. The first consisted of structured pre- and post-training surveys, and a course evaluation by participants. The second consisted of two focus group discussions involving purposively selected community health workers in one group, and a convenience sample of course instructors and organisers in the other. Perceptions regarding course content, perceived knowledge acquisition and self-confidence gain were analysed using descriptive statistics for the quantitative data and content analysis for qualitative data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Course participants were predominantly male (76.3 %) with a median age of 42 years and most (80.5 %) had no prior first aid training. Most were satisfied that the learning objectives were reached, the logistics were adequate, and that the content and teaching language were appropriately tailored to local context. The majority (94.7 %) found the 3-day duration insufficient. There was a significant self-confidence gain regarding first aid skills (average 17.9 % in pre- to 95.3 % in post-training, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Favourable opinions on the course structure, content, logistics and teaching methods were noted.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A CFAR course pilot was successfully conducted in Kinshasa. The course is appropriate for context and well received by participants. It can form a key component of developing prehospital care systems in resource-constrained settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48515,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10542602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation and evaluation of a pilot WHO community first aid responder training in Kinshasa, DR Congo: A mixed method study\",\"authors\":\"Ken Diango ,&nbsp;Eric Mafuta ,&nbsp;Lee A. Wallis ,&nbsp;Charmaine Cunningham ,&nbsp;Peter Hodkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.afjem.2023.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Prehospital care in many low- and middle-income countries is underdeveloped and needs strengthening for improved outcomes. Where formal prehospital care systems are under development, integration of a layperson first responder programme may help improve access for those in need. The World Health Organization recently developed the Community First Aid Responder (CFAR) learning program in support of this system, providing that it may require adaptation to be contextually suitable and sustainably implemented at country level. This study assesses a pilot WHO CFAR course in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo, to inform future rollouts and related research.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a 3-day in-person pilot CFAR training with 42 purposively selected community health workers. Data collection involved quantitative and qualitative phases. The first consisted of structured pre- and post-training surveys, and a course evaluation by participants. The second consisted of two focus group discussions involving purposively selected community health workers in one group, and a convenience sample of course instructors and organisers in the other. Perceptions regarding course content, perceived knowledge acquisition and self-confidence gain were analysed using descriptive statistics for the quantitative data and content analysis for qualitative data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Course participants were predominantly male (76.3 %) with a median age of 42 years and most (80.5 %) had no prior first aid training. Most were satisfied that the learning objectives were reached, the logistics were adequate, and that the content and teaching language were appropriately tailored to local context. The majority (94.7 %) found the 3-day duration insufficient. There was a significant self-confidence gain regarding first aid skills (average 17.9 % in pre- to 95.3 % in post-training, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Favourable opinions on the course structure, content, logistics and teaching methods were noted.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A CFAR course pilot was successfully conducted in Kinshasa. The course is appropriate for context and well received by participants. It can form a key component of developing prehospital care systems in resource-constrained settings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10542602/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X23000459\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X23000459","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言许多中低收入国家的院前护理不发达,需要加强以改善结果。在正式的院前护理系统正在开发中的地方,整合非专业人员急救计划可能有助于改善有需要的人的就医机会。世界卫生组织最近制定了社区急救响应者(CFAR)学习计划来支持这一系统,规定它可能需要适应环境,并在国家一级可持续实施。本研究评估了世界卫生组织在刚果民主共和国金沙萨举办的CFAR试点课程,为今后的推广和相关研究提供信息。方法我们对42名有针对性地选择的社区卫生工作者进行了为期3天的CFAR试点培训。数据收集包括定量和定性两个阶段。第一部分包括培训前和培训后的结构化调查,以及参与者对课程的评估。第二次讨论包括两次焦点小组讨论,一组有针对性地选择社区卫生工作者,另一组有课程讲师和组织者的方便样本。对课程内容、感知知识获取和自信获得的感知进行了分析,定量数据采用描述性统计,定性数据采用内容分析。结果课程参与者主要是男性(76.3%),中位年龄为42岁,大多数(80.5%)以前没有接受过急救培训。大多数人对学习目标的实现、后勤保障的充分性以及内容和教学语言的因地制宜感到满意。大多数人(94.7%)认为3天的持续时间不够。在急救技能方面有显著的自信心增强(培训前平均17.9%,培训后平均95.3%,p<0.001)。在课程结构、内容、后勤和教学方法方面有良好的意见。结论在金沙萨成功开展了CFAR课程试点。该课程适合具体情况,深受学员欢迎。它可以成为在资源有限的环境中发展院前护理系统的关键组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation and evaluation of a pilot WHO community first aid responder training in Kinshasa, DR Congo: A mixed method study

Introduction

Prehospital care in many low- and middle-income countries is underdeveloped and needs strengthening for improved outcomes. Where formal prehospital care systems are under development, integration of a layperson first responder programme may help improve access for those in need. The World Health Organization recently developed the Community First Aid Responder (CFAR) learning program in support of this system, providing that it may require adaptation to be contextually suitable and sustainably implemented at country level. This study assesses a pilot WHO CFAR course in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo, to inform future rollouts and related research.

Methods

We conducted a 3-day in-person pilot CFAR training with 42 purposively selected community health workers. Data collection involved quantitative and qualitative phases. The first consisted of structured pre- and post-training surveys, and a course evaluation by participants. The second consisted of two focus group discussions involving purposively selected community health workers in one group, and a convenience sample of course instructors and organisers in the other. Perceptions regarding course content, perceived knowledge acquisition and self-confidence gain were analysed using descriptive statistics for the quantitative data and content analysis for qualitative data.

Results

Course participants were predominantly male (76.3 %) with a median age of 42 years and most (80.5 %) had no prior first aid training. Most were satisfied that the learning objectives were reached, the logistics were adequate, and that the content and teaching language were appropriately tailored to local context. The majority (94.7 %) found the 3-day duration insufficient. There was a significant self-confidence gain regarding first aid skills (average 17.9 % in pre- to 95.3 % in post-training, p < 0.001). Favourable opinions on the course structure, content, logistics and teaching methods were noted.

Conclusion

A CFAR course pilot was successfully conducted in Kinshasa. The course is appropriate for context and well received by participants. It can form a key component of developing prehospital care systems in resource-constrained settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
78
审稿时长
85 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信