脊髓损伤中心抗生素过敏的患病率。

Tommy C Yu, John Cunneen
{"title":"脊髓损伤中心抗生素过敏的患病率。","authors":"Tommy C Yu,&nbsp;John Cunneen","doi":"10.12788/fp.0378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infectious diseases are the most common reason for rehospitalization in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Persons with SCI are at high risk for antibiotic over-use and hospital-acquired infection due to chronic bacteriuria, frequent health care exposure, implanted medical devices, and other factors. We aimed to record the percentage of subjects from the local SCI registry with an antibiotic allergy, the most common antibiotic classes responsible for the allergy, and allergic reactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study at the James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital in Tampa, Florida, of patients in the SCI registry between October 1, 2015, and September 30, 2017. We collected patient demographics and SCI descriptors. The outcomes included antibiotic allergy and adverse drug reactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1866 patients, 1659 met inclusion criteria; 29.8% of the subjects had a recorded allergy to antibiotics. Penicillin (13.1%), sulfa drugs (9.6%), and fluoroquinolone (4.5%) were the most common allergens. However, only 11.9% of patients with a penicillin allergy had severe reactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Almost 30% of patients with SCI had a recorded allergy to an antibiotic. There are opportunities to examine whether approaches to confirm true reactions, such as skin testing, would help mitigate unnecessary avoidance of certain antibiotic classes due to mild adverse effects, rather than a true allergy, in the SCI population. Differentiating true allergy is the only clear way to deter unnecessary avoidance of first-line therapies for antibiotic treatment and avoid promotion of antibiotic resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":73021,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":"40 5","pages":"142-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506495/pdf/fp-40-05-142.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Antibiotic Allergy at a Spinal Cord Injury Center.\",\"authors\":\"Tommy C Yu,&nbsp;John Cunneen\",\"doi\":\"10.12788/fp.0378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infectious diseases are the most common reason for rehospitalization in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Persons with SCI are at high risk for antibiotic over-use and hospital-acquired infection due to chronic bacteriuria, frequent health care exposure, implanted medical devices, and other factors. We aimed to record the percentage of subjects from the local SCI registry with an antibiotic allergy, the most common antibiotic classes responsible for the allergy, and allergic reactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study at the James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital in Tampa, Florida, of patients in the SCI registry between October 1, 2015, and September 30, 2017. We collected patient demographics and SCI descriptors. The outcomes included antibiotic allergy and adverse drug reactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1866 patients, 1659 met inclusion criteria; 29.8% of the subjects had a recorded allergy to antibiotics. Penicillin (13.1%), sulfa drugs (9.6%), and fluoroquinolone (4.5%) were the most common allergens. However, only 11.9% of patients with a penicillin allergy had severe reactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Almost 30% of patients with SCI had a recorded allergy to an antibiotic. There are opportunities to examine whether approaches to confirm true reactions, such as skin testing, would help mitigate unnecessary avoidance of certain antibiotic classes due to mild adverse effects, rather than a true allergy, in the SCI population. Differentiating true allergy is the only clear way to deter unnecessary avoidance of first-line therapies for antibiotic treatment and avoid promotion of antibiotic resistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS\",\"volume\":\"40 5\",\"pages\":\"142-145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506495/pdf/fp-40-05-142.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0378\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:感染性疾病是脊髓损伤(SCI)患者再次住院的最常见原因。SCI患者由于慢性菌尿、频繁接触医疗保健、植入医疗器械和其他因素,抗生素过度使用和医院获得性感染的风险很高。我们的目的是记录来自当地SCI登记处的抗生素过敏、导致过敏的最常见抗生素类别和过敏反应的受试者的百分比。方法:我们在佛罗里达州坦帕市詹姆斯·a·黑利退伍军人医院对2015年10月1日至2017年9月30日期间SCI登记的患者进行了回顾性研究。我们收集了患者人口统计数据和SCI描述符。结果包括抗生素过敏和药物不良反应。结果:1866例患者中,1659例符合入选标准;29.8%的受试者对抗生素过敏。青霉素(13.1%)、磺胺类药物(9.6%)和氟喹诺酮类药物(4.5%)是最常见的过敏原。然而,只有11.9%的青霉素过敏患者出现严重反应。结论:几乎30%的SCI患者对抗生素过敏。有机会研究确认真实反应的方法,如皮肤测试,是否有助于减轻SCI人群中由于轻度不良反应而非真正过敏而不必要地避免使用某些抗生素类别。区分真正的过敏是阻止不必要地避免一线抗生素治疗和避免抗生素耐药性的唯一明确方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of Antibiotic Allergy at a Spinal Cord Injury Center.

Background: Infectious diseases are the most common reason for rehospitalization in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Persons with SCI are at high risk for antibiotic over-use and hospital-acquired infection due to chronic bacteriuria, frequent health care exposure, implanted medical devices, and other factors. We aimed to record the percentage of subjects from the local SCI registry with an antibiotic allergy, the most common antibiotic classes responsible for the allergy, and allergic reactions.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study at the James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital in Tampa, Florida, of patients in the SCI registry between October 1, 2015, and September 30, 2017. We collected patient demographics and SCI descriptors. The outcomes included antibiotic allergy and adverse drug reactions.

Results: Of 1866 patients, 1659 met inclusion criteria; 29.8% of the subjects had a recorded allergy to antibiotics. Penicillin (13.1%), sulfa drugs (9.6%), and fluoroquinolone (4.5%) were the most common allergens. However, only 11.9% of patients with a penicillin allergy had severe reactions.

Conclusions: Almost 30% of patients with SCI had a recorded allergy to an antibiotic. There are opportunities to examine whether approaches to confirm true reactions, such as skin testing, would help mitigate unnecessary avoidance of certain antibiotic classes due to mild adverse effects, rather than a true allergy, in the SCI population. Differentiating true allergy is the only clear way to deter unnecessary avoidance of first-line therapies for antibiotic treatment and avoid promotion of antibiotic resistance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信