转变解决方案:通过澳大利亚的人权进程跟踪毒品、健康和“人”的转变。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Health Sociology Review Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1080/14461242.2023.2254746
Kate Seear
{"title":"转变解决方案:通过澳大利亚的人权进程跟踪毒品、健康和“人”的转变。","authors":"Kate Seear","doi":"10.1080/14461242.2023.2254746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Global drug policy is in a period of change. Human rights can play an important role in such change, but more work is needed to understand the how rights work and why they might come to matter. Drawing on insights from a major study on drug policy and human rights, I argue that important new dynamics in respect of how drugs are thought to relate to health are emerging, including a conceptualisation of some drugs as capable of generating or improving health, rather than undermining it. Drugs are in some cases coming to be understood not as the origin of social problems but as the solution for them. I introduce the concept of 'solutionisation' as a tool for understanding the mechanisms by which human rights shapes ontologies, positioning 'solutionisation' as corollary and counterpart to Carol Bacchi's work on policy 'problematisation' (Bacchi [2009]. <i>Analysing Policy: What is the Problem Represented To Be?</i> Pearson). I argue that both 'problematisation' and 'solutionisation' have value for sociological analyses of human rights and that we need to pay careful attention to the co-constitutive dimensions of drugs and human rights, to understand how norms about health, self and subjects are made, sustained, and brought under pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":46833,"journal":{"name":"Health Sociology Review","volume":" ","pages":"257-272"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shifting solutions: tracking transformations of drugs, health and the 'human' through human rights processes in Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Kate Seear\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14461242.2023.2254746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Global drug policy is in a period of change. Human rights can play an important role in such change, but more work is needed to understand the how rights work and why they might come to matter. Drawing on insights from a major study on drug policy and human rights, I argue that important new dynamics in respect of how drugs are thought to relate to health are emerging, including a conceptualisation of some drugs as capable of generating or improving health, rather than undermining it. Drugs are in some cases coming to be understood not as the origin of social problems but as the solution for them. I introduce the concept of 'solutionisation' as a tool for understanding the mechanisms by which human rights shapes ontologies, positioning 'solutionisation' as corollary and counterpart to Carol Bacchi's work on policy 'problematisation' (Bacchi [2009]. <i>Analysing Policy: What is the Problem Represented To Be?</i> Pearson). I argue that both 'problematisation' and 'solutionisation' have value for sociological analyses of human rights and that we need to pay careful attention to the co-constitutive dimensions of drugs and human rights, to understand how norms about health, self and subjects are made, sustained, and brought under pressure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Sociology Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"257-272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Sociology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2023.2254746\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Sociology Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2023.2254746","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球毒品政策正处于变革时期。人权可以在这种变化中发挥重要作用,但还需要做更多的工作来了解权利是如何运作的,以及为什么它们会变得重要。根据一项关于药物政策和人权的重大研究的见解,我认为,在药物与健康的关系方面,重要的新动态正在出现,包括将一些药物概念化为能够产生或改善健康,而不是破坏健康。在某些情况下,毒品不是社会问题的根源,而是解决问题的办法。我引入了“解决方案”的概念,将其作为理解人权塑造本体的机制的工具,将“解决方案化”定位为必然结果,并与Carol Bacchi关于政策“问题化”的工作相对应(Bacchi[2009]。《分析政策:代表未来的问题是什么?培生》)。我认为,“问题化”和“解决方案化”对人权的社会学分析都有价值,我们需要仔细关注毒品和人权的共同构成维度,以了解健康、自我和主体的规范是如何形成、维持和承受压力的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shifting solutions: tracking transformations of drugs, health and the 'human' through human rights processes in Australia.

Global drug policy is in a period of change. Human rights can play an important role in such change, but more work is needed to understand the how rights work and why they might come to matter. Drawing on insights from a major study on drug policy and human rights, I argue that important new dynamics in respect of how drugs are thought to relate to health are emerging, including a conceptualisation of some drugs as capable of generating or improving health, rather than undermining it. Drugs are in some cases coming to be understood not as the origin of social problems but as the solution for them. I introduce the concept of 'solutionisation' as a tool for understanding the mechanisms by which human rights shapes ontologies, positioning 'solutionisation' as corollary and counterpart to Carol Bacchi's work on policy 'problematisation' (Bacchi [2009]. Analysing Policy: What is the Problem Represented To Be? Pearson). I argue that both 'problematisation' and 'solutionisation' have value for sociological analyses of human rights and that we need to pay careful attention to the co-constitutive dimensions of drugs and human rights, to understand how norms about health, self and subjects are made, sustained, and brought under pressure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: An international, scholarly peer-reviewed journal, Health Sociology Review explores the contribution of sociology and sociological research methods to understanding health and illness; to health policy, promotion and practice; and to equity, social justice, social policy and social work. Health Sociology Review is published in association with The Australian Sociological Association (TASA) under the editorship of Eileen Willis. Health Sociology Review publishes original theoretical and research articles, literature reviews, special issues, symposia, commentaries and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信