跨专业HIV质量改进团队对患者护理和住院医师学习机会的影响。

PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) Pub Date : 2023-09-22 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.22454/PRiMER.2023.691851
Marilyn K Sauk, Kento Sonoda, Carly T Gabriel, Akruti Patel, Cynthia L Salter, Cara R McAnaney, Stephanie L Ballard
{"title":"跨专业HIV质量改进团队对患者护理和住院医师学习机会的影响。","authors":"Marilyn K Sauk,&nbsp;Kento Sonoda,&nbsp;Carly T Gabriel,&nbsp;Akruti Patel,&nbsp;Cynthia L Salter,&nbsp;Cara R McAnaney,&nbsp;Stephanie L Ballard","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2023.691851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care is a recommended competency for family medicine training, many programs report a lack of HIV expertise among faculty. After the departure of faculty with HIV care experience, an interprofessional HIV quality improvement team (HIV-QIT) of physicians and pharmacists aimed to maintain on-site HIV care and retain learning opportunities for residents, using process improvement and panel reviews with a remote HIV specialist faculty member.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study reports on a multicycle quality improvement pilot project with pre- and postintervention chart reviews between December 2019 and May 2021. All patients received primary care and HIV-QIT chart reviews on-site. We compared patients with integrated HIV care on-site to those receiving external HIV specialty care. Primary outcomes included virologic suppression, CD4 count ≥200 cells/mm<sup>3</sup>, and adherence to guideline-recommended HIV care. In cycle 1 (January-June 2020), the HIV-QIT reviewed patient charts and sent guideline-based recommendations to physicians. In cycle 2 (July 2020-May 2021), the HIV-QIT implemented several HIV-specific processes, including decision support updates, note templates, order sets, and reference materials. Sustained process improvements included HIV panel chart audits every 3 to 6 months and subsequent provider education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 29 patients, more than half (55%, n=16) received integrated HIV care at the primary care site. We found no significant difference in care quality measures between primary and specialty care. Barriers to care completion included missed or canceled follow-up visits, on-site phlebotomy service closures, and declined HIV services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HIV-QIT maintained on-site HIV treatment and retained experiential learning opportunities through process improvement and specialist-supported care recommendations to primary care physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"7 ","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544635/pdf/primer-7-32.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of an Interprofessional HIV Quality Improvement Team on Patient Care and Resident Learning Opportunities.\",\"authors\":\"Marilyn K Sauk,&nbsp;Kento Sonoda,&nbsp;Carly T Gabriel,&nbsp;Akruti Patel,&nbsp;Cynthia L Salter,&nbsp;Cara R McAnaney,&nbsp;Stephanie L Ballard\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/PRiMER.2023.691851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care is a recommended competency for family medicine training, many programs report a lack of HIV expertise among faculty. After the departure of faculty with HIV care experience, an interprofessional HIV quality improvement team (HIV-QIT) of physicians and pharmacists aimed to maintain on-site HIV care and retain learning opportunities for residents, using process improvement and panel reviews with a remote HIV specialist faculty member.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study reports on a multicycle quality improvement pilot project with pre- and postintervention chart reviews between December 2019 and May 2021. All patients received primary care and HIV-QIT chart reviews on-site. We compared patients with integrated HIV care on-site to those receiving external HIV specialty care. Primary outcomes included virologic suppression, CD4 count ≥200 cells/mm<sup>3</sup>, and adherence to guideline-recommended HIV care. In cycle 1 (January-June 2020), the HIV-QIT reviewed patient charts and sent guideline-based recommendations to physicians. In cycle 2 (July 2020-May 2021), the HIV-QIT implemented several HIV-specific processes, including decision support updates, note templates, order sets, and reference materials. Sustained process improvements included HIV panel chart audits every 3 to 6 months and subsequent provider education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 29 patients, more than half (55%, n=16) received integrated HIV care at the primary care site. We found no significant difference in care quality measures between primary and specialty care. Barriers to care completion included missed or canceled follow-up visits, on-site phlebotomy service closures, and declined HIV services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HIV-QIT maintained on-site HIV treatment and retained experiential learning opportunities through process improvement and specialist-supported care recommendations to primary care physicians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544635/pdf/primer-7-32.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2023.691851\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2023.691851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:尽管人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)护理是家庭医学培训的推荐能力,但许多项目报告称,教师缺乏HIV专业知识。在具有艾滋病毒护理经验的教员离职后,一个由医生和药剂师组成的跨专业艾滋病毒质量改进团队(HIV-QIT)旨在通过流程改进和与远程艾滋病毒专家教员的小组审查,维持现场艾滋病毒护理,并为住院医师保留学习机会。方法:本研究报告了2019年12月至2021年5月期间的一个多周期质量改进试点项目,包括干预前和干预后的图表审查。所有患者都接受了初级保健和现场HIV-QIT图表审查。我们将接受现场综合HIV护理的患者与接受外部HIV专科护理的患者进行了比较。主要结果包括病毒学抑制、CD4计数≥200个细胞/mm3以及遵守指南推荐的HIV护理。在第1周期(2020年1月至6月),HIV-QIT审查了患者图表,并向医生发送了基于指南的建议。在第2周期(2020年7月至2021年5月),HIV-QIT实施了几个针对HIV的流程,包括决策支持更新、注释模板、订单集和参考材料。持续的流程改进包括每3至6个月对艾滋病毒小组图表进行一次审计,以及随后的提供者教育。结果:在29名患者中,超过一半(55%,n=16)在初级保健场所接受了艾滋病毒综合护理。我们发现初级护理和专科护理在护理质量指标上没有显著差异。完成护理的障碍包括错过或取消随访、现场静脉切开术服务关闭以及艾滋病毒服务拒绝。结论:HIV-QIT通过流程改进和向初级保健医生提供专家支持的护理建议,保持了现场HIV治疗,并保留了经验学习机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of an Interprofessional HIV Quality Improvement Team on Patient Care and Resident Learning Opportunities.

Introduction: Although human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care is a recommended competency for family medicine training, many programs report a lack of HIV expertise among faculty. After the departure of faculty with HIV care experience, an interprofessional HIV quality improvement team (HIV-QIT) of physicians and pharmacists aimed to maintain on-site HIV care and retain learning opportunities for residents, using process improvement and panel reviews with a remote HIV specialist faculty member.

Methods: This study reports on a multicycle quality improvement pilot project with pre- and postintervention chart reviews between December 2019 and May 2021. All patients received primary care and HIV-QIT chart reviews on-site. We compared patients with integrated HIV care on-site to those receiving external HIV specialty care. Primary outcomes included virologic suppression, CD4 count ≥200 cells/mm3, and adherence to guideline-recommended HIV care. In cycle 1 (January-June 2020), the HIV-QIT reviewed patient charts and sent guideline-based recommendations to physicians. In cycle 2 (July 2020-May 2021), the HIV-QIT implemented several HIV-specific processes, including decision support updates, note templates, order sets, and reference materials. Sustained process improvements included HIV panel chart audits every 3 to 6 months and subsequent provider education.

Results: Of 29 patients, more than half (55%, n=16) received integrated HIV care at the primary care site. We found no significant difference in care quality measures between primary and specialty care. Barriers to care completion included missed or canceled follow-up visits, on-site phlebotomy service closures, and declined HIV services.

Conclusions: The HIV-QIT maintained on-site HIV treatment and retained experiential learning opportunities through process improvement and specialist-supported care recommendations to primary care physicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信