听觉提示和加重笔对帕金森病患者笔迹的影响。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Nicole Latimer, Anna Reelfs, Jamie Halbert, Julia Hansen, Ashley Miller, Chloe Barton, Jamie Stuhr, Andrew Zaman PhD, Elizabeth L. Stegemöller PhD
{"title":"听觉提示和加重笔对帕金森病患者笔迹的影响。","authors":"Nicole Latimer,&nbsp;Anna Reelfs,&nbsp;Jamie Halbert,&nbsp;Julia Hansen,&nbsp;Ashley Miller,&nbsp;Chloe Barton,&nbsp;Jamie Stuhr,&nbsp;Andrew Zaman PhD,&nbsp;Elizabeth L. Stegemöller PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2023.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Micrographia, or small handwriting, is a common symptom of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Weighted pens have previously been recommended to improve handwriting, but there is limited research supporting their effectiveness. Additionally, previous research has demonstrated that music as an auditory cue can reduce variability in fine motor movements, but its effect on handwriting in people with PD remains unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study explored potential handwriting interventions for people with PD by evaluating the effectiveness of weighted pens and auditory cues on handwriting.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>This was a pilot cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eight older adults with PD used a standard pen and a weighted pen to write continuous cursive “<em>l</em><span><span>”s on 1.5-cm-lined paper for a total of 10 seconds while listening to auditory cues in 4 conditions: control (silence), metronome, activating music, and relaxing music. Kinematic data were measured with sensors attached to the tip of each pen, and muscle activity was measured with electromyography sensors adhered to the extensor </span>digitorum communis and first dorsal interosseous.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>When writing with the standard pen, peak-to-peak time was reduced in the metronome (control = 0.807 ± 0.121 seconds, metronome = 0.701 ± 0.100 seconds, <em>p</em> = 0.024) and activating (control = 0.807 ± 0.121 seconds, activating = 0.691 ± 0.113 seconds<em>, p</em> = 0.009) conditions compared to the control condition. Furthermore, the weighted pen increased the variability of distance between letter peaks (standard = 0.187 ± 0.010, weighted = 0.482 ± 0.065, <em>p</em> = 0.033) and the variability of time needed to complete each letter (standard = 0.176 ± 0.010, weighted = 0.187 ± 0.016, <em>p</em><span><span> = 0.042) compared to the standard pen. Finally, area under the curve of the extensor </span>digitorum communis was reduced in the metronome (metronome = 66.03 ± 25.74 mV, control = 88.98 ± 30.40 mV, </span><em>p</em> = 0.034) and activating music (activating = 66.49 ± 26.02 mV<em>,</em> control = 88.98 ± 30.40 mV<em>, p</em> = 0.012) conditions compared to control when writing with the standard pen.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results suggest that weighted pens may not improve handwriting in novice users, but auditory cues appear beneficial. This can inform future directions in the research and clinical application of handwriting interventions for persons with PD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of auditory cues and weighted pens on handwriting in individuals with Parkinson’s disease\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Latimer,&nbsp;Anna Reelfs,&nbsp;Jamie Halbert,&nbsp;Julia Hansen,&nbsp;Ashley Miller,&nbsp;Chloe Barton,&nbsp;Jamie Stuhr,&nbsp;Andrew Zaman PhD,&nbsp;Elizabeth L. Stegemöller PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jht.2023.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Micrographia, or small handwriting, is a common symptom of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Weighted pens have previously been recommended to improve handwriting, but there is limited research supporting their effectiveness. Additionally, previous research has demonstrated that music as an auditory cue can reduce variability in fine motor movements, but its effect on handwriting in people with PD remains unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study explored potential handwriting interventions for people with PD by evaluating the effectiveness of weighted pens and auditory cues on handwriting.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>This was a pilot cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eight older adults with PD used a standard pen and a weighted pen to write continuous cursive “<em>l</em><span><span>”s on 1.5-cm-lined paper for a total of 10 seconds while listening to auditory cues in 4 conditions: control (silence), metronome, activating music, and relaxing music. Kinematic data were measured with sensors attached to the tip of each pen, and muscle activity was measured with electromyography sensors adhered to the extensor </span>digitorum communis and first dorsal interosseous.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>When writing with the standard pen, peak-to-peak time was reduced in the metronome (control = 0.807 ± 0.121 seconds, metronome = 0.701 ± 0.100 seconds, <em>p</em> = 0.024) and activating (control = 0.807 ± 0.121 seconds, activating = 0.691 ± 0.113 seconds<em>, p</em> = 0.009) conditions compared to the control condition. Furthermore, the weighted pen increased the variability of distance between letter peaks (standard = 0.187 ± 0.010, weighted = 0.482 ± 0.065, <em>p</em> = 0.033) and the variability of time needed to complete each letter (standard = 0.176 ± 0.010, weighted = 0.187 ± 0.016, <em>p</em><span><span> = 0.042) compared to the standard pen. Finally, area under the curve of the extensor </span>digitorum communis was reduced in the metronome (metronome = 66.03 ± 25.74 mV, control = 88.98 ± 30.40 mV, </span><em>p</em> = 0.034) and activating music (activating = 66.49 ± 26.02 mV<em>,</em> control = 88.98 ± 30.40 mV<em>, p</em> = 0.012) conditions compared to control when writing with the standard pen.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results suggest that weighted pens may not improve handwriting in novice users, but auditory cues appear beneficial. This can inform future directions in the research and clinical application of handwriting interventions for persons with PD.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089411302300114X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089411302300114X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:小笔迹是帕金森病的常见症状。加重笔以前曾被推荐用于改善笔迹,但支持其有效性的研究有限。此外,先前的研究表明,音乐作为一种听觉线索可以减少精细运动的可变性,但它对帕金森病患者笔迹的影响尚不清楚。目的:本研究通过评估加重笔和听觉提示对PD患者笔迹的有效性,探索潜在的笔迹干预措施。研究设计:这是一项试点队列研究。方法:8名患有帕金森病的老年人使用标准笔和加重笔在1.5厘米长的纸上连续书写草书“l”,共10秒,同时在4种条件下听听觉提示:控制(静音)、节拍器、激活音乐和放松音乐。运动数据用附着在每支笔尖端的传感器测量,肌肉活动用附着在趾总伸肌和第一骨间背侧的肌电图传感器测量。结果:与对照组相比,在节拍器(对照组=0.807±0.121秒,节拍器=0.701±0.100秒,p=0.024)和激活(对照组0.807±0.121秒钟,激活组=0.691±0.113秒,p=0.009)条件下,用标准笔写字时,峰间时间减少。此外,与标准笔相比,加权笔增加了字母峰值之间距离的可变性(标准=0.187±0.010,加权=0.482±0.065,p=0.033)和完成每个字母所需时间的可变性(标准=0.176±0.010、加权=0.187±0.01 6,p=0.042)。最后,在节拍器(节拍器=66.03±25.74 mV,对照=88.98±30.40 mV,p=0.034)和激活音乐(激活=66.49±26.02 mV,对照=88.98±30.40 mV,p=0.012)条件下,与用标准笔书写的对照相比,趾总伸肌的曲线下面积减少。结论:这些结果表明,加重笔可能不会改善新手的笔迹,但听觉提示似乎是有益的。这可以为PD患者手写干预的研究和临床应用提供未来的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effects of auditory cues and weighted pens on handwriting in individuals with Parkinson’s disease

Background

Micrographia, or small handwriting, is a common symptom of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Weighted pens have previously been recommended to improve handwriting, but there is limited research supporting their effectiveness. Additionally, previous research has demonstrated that music as an auditory cue can reduce variability in fine motor movements, but its effect on handwriting in people with PD remains unknown.

Purpose

This study explored potential handwriting interventions for people with PD by evaluating the effectiveness of weighted pens and auditory cues on handwriting.

Study Design

This was a pilot cohort study.

Methods

Eight older adults with PD used a standard pen and a weighted pen to write continuous cursive “l”s on 1.5-cm-lined paper for a total of 10 seconds while listening to auditory cues in 4 conditions: control (silence), metronome, activating music, and relaxing music. Kinematic data were measured with sensors attached to the tip of each pen, and muscle activity was measured with electromyography sensors adhered to the extensor digitorum communis and first dorsal interosseous.

Results

When writing with the standard pen, peak-to-peak time was reduced in the metronome (control = 0.807 ± 0.121 seconds, metronome = 0.701 ± 0.100 seconds, p = 0.024) and activating (control = 0.807 ± 0.121 seconds, activating = 0.691 ± 0.113 seconds, p = 0.009) conditions compared to the control condition. Furthermore, the weighted pen increased the variability of distance between letter peaks (standard = 0.187 ± 0.010, weighted = 0.482 ± 0.065, p = 0.033) and the variability of time needed to complete each letter (standard = 0.176 ± 0.010, weighted = 0.187 ± 0.016, p = 0.042) compared to the standard pen. Finally, area under the curve of the extensor digitorum communis was reduced in the metronome (metronome = 66.03 ± 25.74 mV, control = 88.98 ± 30.40 mV, p = 0.034) and activating music (activating = 66.49 ± 26.02 mV, control = 88.98 ± 30.40 mV, p = 0.012) conditions compared to control when writing with the standard pen.

Conclusions

These results suggest that weighted pens may not improve handwriting in novice users, but auditory cues appear beneficial. This can inform future directions in the research and clinical application of handwriting interventions for persons with PD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信