旁观者对医学教育中欺凌和骚扰的反应。

PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) Pub Date : 2023-07-17 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.22454/PRiMER.2023.805720
Danielle L Terry, Gabrielle Safian, Christopher Terry, Kajal Vachharajani
{"title":"旁观者对医学教育中欺凌和骚扰的反应。","authors":"Danielle L Terry,&nbsp;Gabrielle Safian,&nbsp;Christopher Terry,&nbsp;Kajal Vachharajani","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2023.805720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Bullying and harassment in medical education are common. The aims of this study were (a) to describe how medical trainees respond to harassment or bullying in medical settings, and (b) to determine whether trainees respond differently based on the type of harassment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were medical students, residents, and fellows (N=80) recruited from a rural teaching hospital in Pennsylvania. We invited them to complete an electronic survey and react to four standardized situations that included common harassment types in graduate medical education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, 31.6% reported that they would consult with peer colleagues, 50.6% would provide direct support to the victim, 16.3% would approach the perpetrator or intervene directly, and 19.3% would file a formal report with a supervisor or human resources. Findings indicated that respondents as bystanders would intervene significantly more often when harassment was related to inappropriate racial or ethnic comments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given that a sizable portion of trainees would speak directly with a victim, training bystanders in strategies to address or mentor others on how to address harassment more effectively could be useful in graduate medical education. Future research might explore trainees' differential reactions to harassment types toward developing more comprehensive intervention programs in graduate and undergraduate medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"7 ","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544639/pdf/primer-7-23.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bystander Responses to Bullying and Harassment in Medical Education.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle L Terry,&nbsp;Gabrielle Safian,&nbsp;Christopher Terry,&nbsp;Kajal Vachharajani\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/PRiMER.2023.805720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Bullying and harassment in medical education are common. The aims of this study were (a) to describe how medical trainees respond to harassment or bullying in medical settings, and (b) to determine whether trainees respond differently based on the type of harassment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were medical students, residents, and fellows (N=80) recruited from a rural teaching hospital in Pennsylvania. We invited them to complete an electronic survey and react to four standardized situations that included common harassment types in graduate medical education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, 31.6% reported that they would consult with peer colleagues, 50.6% would provide direct support to the victim, 16.3% would approach the perpetrator or intervene directly, and 19.3% would file a formal report with a supervisor or human resources. Findings indicated that respondents as bystanders would intervene significantly more often when harassment was related to inappropriate racial or ethnic comments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given that a sizable portion of trainees would speak directly with a victim, training bystanders in strategies to address or mentor others on how to address harassment more effectively could be useful in graduate medical education. Future research might explore trainees' differential reactions to harassment types toward developing more comprehensive intervention programs in graduate and undergraduate medical education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544639/pdf/primer-7-23.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2023.805720\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2023.805720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:医学教育中的欺凌和骚扰现象十分普遍。这项研究的目的是(a)描述医疗受训人员如何应对医疗环境中的骚扰或欺凌,以及(b)确定受训人员是否根据骚扰类型做出不同的反应。方法:参与者是从宾夕法尼亚州一家乡村教学医院招募的医学生、住院医师和研究员(N=80)。我们邀请他们完成一项电子调查,并对四种标准化情况做出反应,其中包括研究生医学教育中常见的骚扰类型。结果:平均而言,31.6%的人表示会与同事协商,50.6%的人会向受害者提供直接支持,16.3%的人会接近施暴者或直接干预,19.3%的人向主管或人力资源部提交正式报告。调查结果表明,当骚扰与不恰当的种族或族裔言论有关时,作为旁观者的受访者会更频繁地进行干预。结论:鉴于相当一部分受训者会直接与受害者交谈,培训旁观者如何更有效地解决或指导他人解决骚扰问题的策略在研究生医学教育中可能很有用。未来的研究可能会探索受训者对骚扰类型的不同反应,从而在研究生和本科生医学教育中制定更全面的干预计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bystander Responses to Bullying and Harassment in Medical Education.

Background and objectives: Bullying and harassment in medical education are common. The aims of this study were (a) to describe how medical trainees respond to harassment or bullying in medical settings, and (b) to determine whether trainees respond differently based on the type of harassment.

Methods: Participants were medical students, residents, and fellows (N=80) recruited from a rural teaching hospital in Pennsylvania. We invited them to complete an electronic survey and react to four standardized situations that included common harassment types in graduate medical education.

Results: On average, 31.6% reported that they would consult with peer colleagues, 50.6% would provide direct support to the victim, 16.3% would approach the perpetrator or intervene directly, and 19.3% would file a formal report with a supervisor or human resources. Findings indicated that respondents as bystanders would intervene significantly more often when harassment was related to inappropriate racial or ethnic comments.

Conclusions: Given that a sizable portion of trainees would speak directly with a victim, training bystanders in strategies to address or mentor others on how to address harassment more effectively could be useful in graduate medical education. Future research might explore trainees' differential reactions to harassment types toward developing more comprehensive intervention programs in graduate and undergraduate medical education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信