将基因组信息纳入南非美利奴羊生产和繁殖性状的遗传评估中。

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Cornelius Nel, Phillip Gurman, Andrew Swan, Julius van der Werf, Margaretha Snyman, Kennedy Dzama, Willem Olivier, Anna Scholtz, Schalk Cloete
{"title":"将基因组信息纳入南非美利奴羊生产和繁殖性状的遗传评估中。","authors":"Cornelius Nel,&nbsp;Phillip Gurman,&nbsp;Andrew Swan,&nbsp;Julius van der Werf,&nbsp;Margaretha Snyman,&nbsp;Kennedy Dzama,&nbsp;Willem Olivier,&nbsp;Anna Scholtz,&nbsp;Schalk Cloete","doi":"10.1111/jbg.12826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Genomic selection (GS) has become common in sheep breeding programmes in Australia, New Zealand, France and Ireland but requires validation in South Africa (SA). This study aimed to compare the predictive ability, bias and dispersion of pedigree BLUP (ABLUP) and single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) for production and reproduction traits in South African Merinos. Animals in this study originated from five research and five commercial Merino flocks and included between 54,072 and 79,100 production records for weaning weight (WW), yearling weight (YW), fibre diameter (FD), clean fleece weight (CFW) and staple length (SL). For reproduction traits, the dataset included 58,744 repeated records from 17,268 ewes for the number of lambs born (NLB), number of lambs weaned (NLW) and the total weight weaned (TWW). The single-step relationship matrix, <i>H</i>, was calculated using PreGS90 software combining 2811 animals with medium density (~50 K) genotypes and the pedigree of 88,600 animals. Assessment was based on single-trait analysis using ASREML V4.2 software. The accuracy of prediction was evaluated according to the ‘LR-method’ by a cross-validation design. Validation candidates were assigned according to Scenario I: born after a certain time point; and Scenario II: born in a particular flock. In Scenario I, the genotyping rate for the reference population between 2006 and the 2013 cut-off point approached 7% of animals with phenotypes and 20% of their sires. For reproduction traits, about 20% of ewes born between 2006 and 2011 cut-off were genotyped, along with 15% of their sires. Genotyping rates in the validation set of Scenario I were 3.7% (production) and 11.4% (reproduction) for candidates and 35% of their sires. Sires were allowed to have progeny in both the reference and validation set. In Scenario I, ssGBLUP increased the accuracy of prediction for all traits except NLB, ranging between +8% (0.62–0.67) for FD and +44% (0.36–0.52) for WW. This showed a promising gain in accuracy despite a modestly sized reference population. In the ‘across flock validation’ (Scenario II), overall accuracy was lower, but with greater differences between ABLUP and ssGBLUP ranging between +17% (0.12–0.14) for TWW and +117% (0.18–0.39) for WW. There was little indication of severe bias, but some traits were prone to over dispersion and the use of genomic information did not improve this. These results were the first to validate the benefit of genomic information in South African Merinos. However, because production traits are moderately heritable and easy to measure at an early age, future research should be aimed at best exploiting GS methods towards genetic prediction of sex-limited and/or lowly heritable traits such as NLW. GS methods should be combined with dedicated efforts to increase genetic links between sectors and improved phenotyping by commercial flocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":54885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","volume":"141 1","pages":"65-82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jbg.12826","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Including genomic information in the genetic evaluation of production and reproduction traits in South African Merino sheep\",\"authors\":\"Cornelius Nel,&nbsp;Phillip Gurman,&nbsp;Andrew Swan,&nbsp;Julius van der Werf,&nbsp;Margaretha Snyman,&nbsp;Kennedy Dzama,&nbsp;Willem Olivier,&nbsp;Anna Scholtz,&nbsp;Schalk Cloete\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbg.12826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Genomic selection (GS) has become common in sheep breeding programmes in Australia, New Zealand, France and Ireland but requires validation in South Africa (SA). This study aimed to compare the predictive ability, bias and dispersion of pedigree BLUP (ABLUP) and single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) for production and reproduction traits in South African Merinos. Animals in this study originated from five research and five commercial Merino flocks and included between 54,072 and 79,100 production records for weaning weight (WW), yearling weight (YW), fibre diameter (FD), clean fleece weight (CFW) and staple length (SL). For reproduction traits, the dataset included 58,744 repeated records from 17,268 ewes for the number of lambs born (NLB), number of lambs weaned (NLW) and the total weight weaned (TWW). The single-step relationship matrix, <i>H</i>, was calculated using PreGS90 software combining 2811 animals with medium density (~50 K) genotypes and the pedigree of 88,600 animals. Assessment was based on single-trait analysis using ASREML V4.2 software. The accuracy of prediction was evaluated according to the ‘LR-method’ by a cross-validation design. Validation candidates were assigned according to Scenario I: born after a certain time point; and Scenario II: born in a particular flock. In Scenario I, the genotyping rate for the reference population between 2006 and the 2013 cut-off point approached 7% of animals with phenotypes and 20% of their sires. For reproduction traits, about 20% of ewes born between 2006 and 2011 cut-off were genotyped, along with 15% of their sires. Genotyping rates in the validation set of Scenario I were 3.7% (production) and 11.4% (reproduction) for candidates and 35% of their sires. Sires were allowed to have progeny in both the reference and validation set. In Scenario I, ssGBLUP increased the accuracy of prediction for all traits except NLB, ranging between +8% (0.62–0.67) for FD and +44% (0.36–0.52) for WW. This showed a promising gain in accuracy despite a modestly sized reference population. In the ‘across flock validation’ (Scenario II), overall accuracy was lower, but with greater differences between ABLUP and ssGBLUP ranging between +17% (0.12–0.14) for TWW and +117% (0.18–0.39) for WW. There was little indication of severe bias, but some traits were prone to over dispersion and the use of genomic information did not improve this. These results were the first to validate the benefit of genomic information in South African Merinos. However, because production traits are moderately heritable and easy to measure at an early age, future research should be aimed at best exploiting GS methods towards genetic prediction of sex-limited and/or lowly heritable traits such as NLW. GS methods should be combined with dedicated efforts to increase genetic links between sectors and improved phenotyping by commercial flocks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics\",\"volume\":\"141 1\",\"pages\":\"65-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jbg.12826\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbg.12826\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbg.12826","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基因组选择(GS)在澳大利亚、新西兰、法国和爱尔兰的绵羊育种计划中已经很常见,但在南非需要验证。本研究旨在比较谱系BLUP(ABLUP)和单步基因组BLUP(ssGBLUP)对南非美利奴犬生产和繁殖性状的预测能力、偏倚和分散性。本研究中的动物来自五个研究和五个商业美利奴群,包括54072至79100份断奶体重(WW)、一岁体重(YW)、纤维直径(FD)、净羊毛重量(CFW)和短纤维长度(SL)的生产记录。对于繁殖性状,数据集包括17268只母羊的58744个重复记录,包括出生羔羊数量(NLB)、断奶羔羊数量(NLW)和断奶总重量(TWW)。使用PreGS90软件结合2811只中等密度(~50 K) 88600只动物的基因型和家系。使用ASREML V4.2软件基于单性状分析进行评估。通过交叉验证设计,根据“LR方法”评估预测的准确性。根据场景I分配验证候选者:在某个时间点之后出生;场景二:出生在一个特定的群体中。在情景I中,2006年至2013年截止点期间,参考群体的基因分型率接近7%的表型动物和20%的父系。在繁殖特征方面,2006年至2011年出生的母羊中,约有20%的母羊和15%的父系进行了基因分型。场景I验证集中的候选基因和其父系的基因分型率分别为3.7%(生产)和11.4%(繁殖)。Sires被允许在参考和验证集中都有后代。在情景I中,ssGBLUP提高了除NLB外的所有性状的预测精度,FD的预测精度在+8%(0.62-0.67)之间,WW的预测精度为+44%(0.36-0.52)。这表明,尽管参考群体规模适中,但准确性仍有希望提高。在“跨群体验证”(场景II)中,总体准确度较低,但ABLUP和ssGBLUP之间的差异较大,TWW为+17%(0.12-0.14),WW为+117%(0.18-0.39)。几乎没有严重偏倚的迹象,但一些性状容易过度分散,基因组信息的使用并没有改善这一点。这些结果首次验证了南非美利奴的基因组信息的益处。然而,由于生产性状具有中等遗传性,并且在早期很容易测量,未来的研究应该旨在最好地利用GS方法来预测性别受限和/或低遗传性性状,如NLW。GS方法应与专门努力相结合,以增加部门之间的遗传联系,并通过商业羊群改善表型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Including genomic information in the genetic evaluation of production and reproduction traits in South African Merino sheep

Including genomic information in the genetic evaluation of production and reproduction traits in South African Merino sheep

Genomic selection (GS) has become common in sheep breeding programmes in Australia, New Zealand, France and Ireland but requires validation in South Africa (SA). This study aimed to compare the predictive ability, bias and dispersion of pedigree BLUP (ABLUP) and single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) for production and reproduction traits in South African Merinos. Animals in this study originated from five research and five commercial Merino flocks and included between 54,072 and 79,100 production records for weaning weight (WW), yearling weight (YW), fibre diameter (FD), clean fleece weight (CFW) and staple length (SL). For reproduction traits, the dataset included 58,744 repeated records from 17,268 ewes for the number of lambs born (NLB), number of lambs weaned (NLW) and the total weight weaned (TWW). The single-step relationship matrix, H, was calculated using PreGS90 software combining 2811 animals with medium density (~50 K) genotypes and the pedigree of 88,600 animals. Assessment was based on single-trait analysis using ASREML V4.2 software. The accuracy of prediction was evaluated according to the ‘LR-method’ by a cross-validation design. Validation candidates were assigned according to Scenario I: born after a certain time point; and Scenario II: born in a particular flock. In Scenario I, the genotyping rate for the reference population between 2006 and the 2013 cut-off point approached 7% of animals with phenotypes and 20% of their sires. For reproduction traits, about 20% of ewes born between 2006 and 2011 cut-off were genotyped, along with 15% of their sires. Genotyping rates in the validation set of Scenario I were 3.7% (production) and 11.4% (reproduction) for candidates and 35% of their sires. Sires were allowed to have progeny in both the reference and validation set. In Scenario I, ssGBLUP increased the accuracy of prediction for all traits except NLB, ranging between +8% (0.62–0.67) for FD and +44% (0.36–0.52) for WW. This showed a promising gain in accuracy despite a modestly sized reference population. In the ‘across flock validation’ (Scenario II), overall accuracy was lower, but with greater differences between ABLUP and ssGBLUP ranging between +17% (0.12–0.14) for TWW and +117% (0.18–0.39) for WW. There was little indication of severe bias, but some traits were prone to over dispersion and the use of genomic information did not improve this. These results were the first to validate the benefit of genomic information in South African Merinos. However, because production traits are moderately heritable and easy to measure at an early age, future research should be aimed at best exploiting GS methods towards genetic prediction of sex-limited and/or lowly heritable traits such as NLW. GS methods should be combined with dedicated efforts to increase genetic links between sectors and improved phenotyping by commercial flocks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics publishes original articles by international scientists on genomic selection, and any other topic related to breeding programmes, selection, quantitative genetic, genomics, diversity and evolution of domestic animals. Researchers, teachers, and the animal breeding industry will find the reports of interest. Book reviews appear in many issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信