手部不对称受累:土耳其版双手册精细运动功能2.0分类对脑瘫儿童的心理测量特性。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
{"title":"手部不对称受累:土耳其版双手册精细运动功能2.0分类对脑瘫儿童的心理测量特性。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2023.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Manual functions affect more than a half of children with Cerebral palsy (CP). Asymmetric involvement of hands may also affect unilateral and bilateral activities of daily life. The Bimanual Fine Motor Function version 2.0 (BFMF-2.0) is a unique functional classification that categorizes the capacity of each hand (what the child can do) during bimanual functions.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the BFMF-2.0 in children with CP.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>Clinical measurement and cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study included 91 children with CP (56 girls, mean age; 7.41 ± 4.23 years [4–18 years]) and their parents. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST), and the Box and Block Test (BBT) were used for construct and concurrent validity. Experienced/inexperienced therapists and parents classified fine motor capacities of the children via live or video-based observation to assess inter-rater reliability. Three weeks later, the children were reclassified for intra-rater reliability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The Turkish version of the BFMF-2.0 classification was strongly correlated with the MACS (rho = −0.88, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), the QUEST (rho = 0.80, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and the BBT (rho = −0.77, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The inter-rater reliability scores were weak to excellent between the parents and the therapists (via live observation, κ<sub>w</sub> = 0.57) and also between experienced/inexperienced therapists (via live or video-based observation, κ<sub>w</sub> = 0.66–0.79). Intra-rater reliability scores were good to excellent (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC] = 0.87–0.95).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The Turkish version of the BFMF-2.0 classification is valid and reliable and could be applied by experienced and inexperienced therapists via live or video-based observation and by parents via live observation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":"37 3","pages":"Pages 429-437"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asymmetric involvement of hands: Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Bimanual Fine Motor Function 2.0 classification in children with cerebral palsy\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jht.2023.08.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Manual functions affect more than a half of children with Cerebral palsy (CP). Asymmetric involvement of hands may also affect unilateral and bilateral activities of daily life. The Bimanual Fine Motor Function version 2.0 (BFMF-2.0) is a unique functional classification that categorizes the capacity of each hand (what the child can do) during bimanual functions.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the BFMF-2.0 in children with CP.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>Clinical measurement and cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study included 91 children with CP (56 girls, mean age; 7.41 ± 4.23 years [4–18 years]) and their parents. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST), and the Box and Block Test (BBT) were used for construct and concurrent validity. Experienced/inexperienced therapists and parents classified fine motor capacities of the children via live or video-based observation to assess inter-rater reliability. Three weeks later, the children were reclassified for intra-rater reliability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The Turkish version of the BFMF-2.0 classification was strongly correlated with the MACS (rho = −0.88, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), the QUEST (rho = 0.80, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and the BBT (rho = −0.77, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The inter-rater reliability scores were weak to excellent between the parents and the therapists (via live observation, κ<sub>w</sub> = 0.57) and also between experienced/inexperienced therapists (via live or video-based observation, κ<sub>w</sub> = 0.66–0.79). Intra-rater reliability scores were good to excellent (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC] = 0.87–0.95).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The Turkish version of the BFMF-2.0 classification is valid and reliable and could be applied by experienced and inexperienced therapists via live or video-based observation and by parents via live observation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 429-437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894113023001199\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894113023001199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:超过一半的脑瘫儿童的手功能受到影响。手的不对称参与也可能影响日常生活中的单边和双边活动。双手精细运动功能2.0版(BFMF-2.0)是一种独特的功能分类,对双手功能过程中每只手的能力(孩子能做什么)进行分类。目的:本研究的目的是调查土耳其版BFMF-2.0在CP儿童中的有效性和可靠性。研究设计:临床测量和横断面研究。方法:该研究包括91名CP儿童(56名女孩,平均年龄7.41±4.23岁[4-18岁])及其父母。采用手工能力分类系统(MACS)、上肢技能质量测试(QUEST)和框块测试(BBT)进行结构和并发有效性测试。经验丰富/缺乏经验的治疗师和家长通过现场或视频观察对儿童的精细运动能力进行分类,以评估评分者之间的可靠性。三周后,对这些儿童进行了评分者内部可靠性的重新分类。结果:土耳其版的BFMF-2.0分类与MACS密切相关(rho=0.88,pw=0.57),也与经验丰富/缺乏经验的治疗师密切相关(通过现场或视频观察,κw=0.66–0.79)。评分者内部可靠性得分从好到优(组内相关系数[ICC]=0.87–0.95)分类是有效和可靠的,经验丰富和缺乏经验的治疗师可以通过现场或视频观察应用,父母可以通过现场观察应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asymmetric involvement of hands: Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Bimanual Fine Motor Function 2.0 classification in children with cerebral palsy

Background

Manual functions affect more than a half of children with Cerebral palsy (CP). Asymmetric involvement of hands may also affect unilateral and bilateral activities of daily life. The Bimanual Fine Motor Function version 2.0 (BFMF-2.0) is a unique functional classification that categorizes the capacity of each hand (what the child can do) during bimanual functions.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the BFMF-2.0 in children with CP.

Study Design

Clinical measurement and cross-sectional study.

Methods

The study included 91 children with CP (56 girls, mean age; 7.41 ± 4.23 years [4–18 years]) and their parents. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST), and the Box and Block Test (BBT) were used for construct and concurrent validity. Experienced/inexperienced therapists and parents classified fine motor capacities of the children via live or video-based observation to assess inter-rater reliability. Three weeks later, the children were reclassified for intra-rater reliability.

Results

The Turkish version of the BFMF-2.0 classification was strongly correlated with the MACS (rho = −0.88, p < 0.001), the QUEST (rho = 0.80, p < 0.001), and the BBT (rho = −0.77, p < 0.001). The inter-rater reliability scores were weak to excellent between the parents and the therapists (via live observation, κw = 0.57) and also between experienced/inexperienced therapists (via live or video-based observation, κw = 0.66–0.79). Intra-rater reliability scores were good to excellent (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC] = 0.87–0.95).

Conclusions

The Turkish version of the BFMF-2.0 classification is valid and reliable and could be applied by experienced and inexperienced therapists via live or video-based observation and by parents via live observation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信