研究父母反馈类型与学龄前儿童学习技能之间的关系。

International journal of psychological studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-09 DOI:10.5539/ijps.v14n4p1
Chelsea E Carver, Shirley Duong, Heather Bachman, Elizabeth Votruba-Drzal, Melissa E Libertus
{"title":"研究父母反馈类型与学龄前儿童学习技能之间的关系。","authors":"Chelsea E Carver,&nbsp;Shirley Duong,&nbsp;Heather Bachman,&nbsp;Elizabeth Votruba-Drzal,&nbsp;Melissa E Libertus","doi":"10.5539/ijps.v14n4p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior research has shown associations between parent and teacher feedback and school-aged children's academic outcomes. Specifically, studies have demonstrated that positive feedback (i.e., praise and/or affirmation) is beneficial for children's academic outcomes, while corrective feedback exhibits more mixed associations with children's academic outcomes. Little is known about the relations between parental feedback and younger children's academic skills. The present study examines the frequency of positive and corrective types of feedback provided by parents of 4-year-old children during semi-structured interactions, as well as how these feedback types relate to children's concurrent math and language skills and their change in math skills over a one-year period. Parent-child dyads (<i>n</i>=91) were observed interacting with a picture book, grocery store set, and magnet board puzzle for 5 to 10 minutes each, after which they completed math and language assessments. Parental affirmation was positively and corrective feedback was negatively associated with children's concurrent math outcomes, but only corrective feedback was uniquely negatively associated with children's math outcomes when controlling for affirmations. Parental praise was individually and uniquely positively associated with children's expressive vocabulary and change in math outcomes from age 4 to age 5. This study suggests that the relations between parental feedback and young children's academic outcomes depend on the type of feedback and the outcome of interest (i.e., math vs language), which can inform how parents may want to provide feedback to facilitate learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":90867,"journal":{"name":"International journal of psychological studies","volume":"14 4","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552790/pdf/nihms-1879448.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Relations Between Parental Feedback Types and Preschool-Aged Children's Academic Skills.\",\"authors\":\"Chelsea E Carver,&nbsp;Shirley Duong,&nbsp;Heather Bachman,&nbsp;Elizabeth Votruba-Drzal,&nbsp;Melissa E Libertus\",\"doi\":\"10.5539/ijps.v14n4p1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prior research has shown associations between parent and teacher feedback and school-aged children's academic outcomes. Specifically, studies have demonstrated that positive feedback (i.e., praise and/or affirmation) is beneficial for children's academic outcomes, while corrective feedback exhibits more mixed associations with children's academic outcomes. Little is known about the relations between parental feedback and younger children's academic skills. The present study examines the frequency of positive and corrective types of feedback provided by parents of 4-year-old children during semi-structured interactions, as well as how these feedback types relate to children's concurrent math and language skills and their change in math skills over a one-year period. Parent-child dyads (<i>n</i>=91) were observed interacting with a picture book, grocery store set, and magnet board puzzle for 5 to 10 minutes each, after which they completed math and language assessments. Parental affirmation was positively and corrective feedback was negatively associated with children's concurrent math outcomes, but only corrective feedback was uniquely negatively associated with children's math outcomes when controlling for affirmations. Parental praise was individually and uniquely positively associated with children's expressive vocabulary and change in math outcomes from age 4 to age 5. This study suggests that the relations between parental feedback and young children's academic outcomes depend on the type of feedback and the outcome of interest (i.e., math vs language), which can inform how parents may want to provide feedback to facilitate learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of psychological studies\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552790/pdf/nihms-1879448.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of psychological studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v14n4p1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of psychological studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v14n4p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究表明,家长和老师的反馈与学龄儿童的学业成绩之间存在关联。具体而言,研究表明,积极的反馈(即表扬和/或肯定)有利于儿童的学业成绩,而纠正性反馈与儿童的学业成果之间的关联更为复杂。关于父母的反馈和年幼孩子的学习技能之间的关系,人们知之甚少。本研究考察了4岁儿童的父母在半结构化互动中提供积极和纠正类型反馈的频率,以及这些反馈类型与儿童的并行数学和语言技能以及他们在一年内数学技能的变化之间的关系。观察到母子二人组(n=91)分别与绘本、杂货店套装和磁铁板拼图互动5到10分钟,之后他们完成了数学和语言评估。父母的肯定是积极的,纠正性反馈与儿童的同时数学成绩呈负相关,但在控制肯定时,只有纠正性反馈才与儿童的数学成绩呈独特的负相关。从4岁到5岁,父母的表扬与孩子表达能力强的词汇和数学成绩的变化有着独特的正相关关系。这项研究表明,父母的反馈与幼儿的学业成绩之间的关系取决于反馈的类型和兴趣结果(即数学与语言),这可以告知父母如何提供反馈以促进学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining Relations Between Parental Feedback Types and Preschool-Aged Children's Academic Skills.

Prior research has shown associations between parent and teacher feedback and school-aged children's academic outcomes. Specifically, studies have demonstrated that positive feedback (i.e., praise and/or affirmation) is beneficial for children's academic outcomes, while corrective feedback exhibits more mixed associations with children's academic outcomes. Little is known about the relations between parental feedback and younger children's academic skills. The present study examines the frequency of positive and corrective types of feedback provided by parents of 4-year-old children during semi-structured interactions, as well as how these feedback types relate to children's concurrent math and language skills and their change in math skills over a one-year period. Parent-child dyads (n=91) were observed interacting with a picture book, grocery store set, and magnet board puzzle for 5 to 10 minutes each, after which they completed math and language assessments. Parental affirmation was positively and corrective feedback was negatively associated with children's concurrent math outcomes, but only corrective feedback was uniquely negatively associated with children's math outcomes when controlling for affirmations. Parental praise was individually and uniquely positively associated with children's expressive vocabulary and change in math outcomes from age 4 to age 5. This study suggests that the relations between parental feedback and young children's academic outcomes depend on the type of feedback and the outcome of interest (i.e., math vs language), which can inform how parents may want to provide feedback to facilitate learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信