{"title":"日本斯坦福大学肾移植和活体肾移植一年疗效综合心理社会评估协会。","authors":"Kosuke Takano M.A. , Sayaka Kobayashi Ph.D. , Hidehiro Oshibuchi M.D., Ph.D. , Junko Tsutsui Ph.D. , Nano Mishima M.A. , Satoko Ito M.D., Ph.D. , Rumiko Kamba M.D. , Rie Akaho M.D., Ph.D. , Katsuji Nishimura M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.jaclp.2023.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Because most kidney transplantations in Japan are performed on the basis of living donors, after-transplant outcomes should achieve optimum results, overcoming participants' possible reduced adherence.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the association between the Japanese version of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT-J) and outcomes, 1 year after the patient's living kidney transplant (LKT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The prospective cohort study was undertaken at Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital from January 2020 to July 2021, with a 1-year follow-up period. The SIPAT-J assesses 18 psychosocial risk factors: (1) Patient's Readiness Level and Illness Management (SIPAT A), (2) Social Support System Level of Readiness (SIPAT B), (3) Psychological Stability and Psychopathology (SIPAT C), and (4) Lifestyle and Effect of Substance Use (SIPAT D). The evaluators, a psychiatrist and 3 clinical psychologists, conducted an independent, blinded application of the SIPAT-J using participants' medical records. The study focused on physical composite outcomes, psychiatric outcomes, and nonadherent behaviors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The participants were 173 LKT recipients (median age [interquartile range], 51 [38–59]); 67.1% were male and 67.1% were employed. The median (interquartile range) SIPAT scores were SIPAT A [7 (5–9)], SIPAT B [7 (5–9)], SIPAT C [2 (0–4)], SIPAT D [3 (3–4)], and SIPAT total [20 (16–23)]. The physical composite outcome was 25 (14.5%), psychiatric outcome 9 (5.2%), and nonadherent behavior 17 (9.8%). SIPAT C (odds ratio = 1.34, 95% confidence interval = 1.06–1.72, <em>P</em> = 0.02) was significantly associated with the psychiatric outcome. SIPAT B (odds ratio = 1.49, 95% confidence interval = 1.12–1.98, <em>P</em> = 0.01) and SIPAT total (odds ratio = 1.13, 95% confidence interval = 1.03–1.24, <em>P</em> = 0.01) were significantly associated with nonadherent behaviors. There was no significant association between the SIPAT and physical composite outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study is the first to examine the association between SIPAT and physical and psychiatric outcomes 1 year after LKT, controlling for follow-up periods and factors other than SIPAT. Comprehensive psychosocial assessment before LKT and early identification of factors that may negatively affect transplant success can allow targeted interventions to be implemented and increase the likelihood of favorable recipient outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266729602300126X/pdfft?md5=1c85a538a2fac0dbc05f973d55b5a26f&pid=1-s2.0-S266729602300126X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant and 1-Year Outcome of Living Kidney Transplantation in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Kosuke Takano M.A. , Sayaka Kobayashi Ph.D. , Hidehiro Oshibuchi M.D., Ph.D. , Junko Tsutsui Ph.D. , Nano Mishima M.A. , Satoko Ito M.D., Ph.D. , Rumiko Kamba M.D. , Rie Akaho M.D., Ph.D. , Katsuji Nishimura M.D., Ph.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaclp.2023.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Because most kidney transplantations in Japan are performed on the basis of living donors, after-transplant outcomes should achieve optimum results, overcoming participants' possible reduced adherence.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the association between the Japanese version of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT-J) and outcomes, 1 year after the patient's living kidney transplant (LKT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The prospective cohort study was undertaken at Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital from January 2020 to July 2021, with a 1-year follow-up period. The SIPAT-J assesses 18 psychosocial risk factors: (1) Patient's Readiness Level and Illness Management (SIPAT A), (2) Social Support System Level of Readiness (SIPAT B), (3) Psychological Stability and Psychopathology (SIPAT C), and (4) Lifestyle and Effect of Substance Use (SIPAT D). The evaluators, a psychiatrist and 3 clinical psychologists, conducted an independent, blinded application of the SIPAT-J using participants' medical records. The study focused on physical composite outcomes, psychiatric outcomes, and nonadherent behaviors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The participants were 173 LKT recipients (median age [interquartile range], 51 [38–59]); 67.1% were male and 67.1% were employed. The median (interquartile range) SIPAT scores were SIPAT A [7 (5–9)], SIPAT B [7 (5–9)], SIPAT C [2 (0–4)], SIPAT D [3 (3–4)], and SIPAT total [20 (16–23)]. The physical composite outcome was 25 (14.5%), psychiatric outcome 9 (5.2%), and nonadherent behavior 17 (9.8%). SIPAT C (odds ratio = 1.34, 95% confidence interval = 1.06–1.72, <em>P</em> = 0.02) was significantly associated with the psychiatric outcome. SIPAT B (odds ratio = 1.49, 95% confidence interval = 1.12–1.98, <em>P</em> = 0.01) and SIPAT total (odds ratio = 1.13, 95% confidence interval = 1.03–1.24, <em>P</em> = 0.01) were significantly associated with nonadherent behaviors. There was no significant association between the SIPAT and physical composite outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study is the first to examine the association between SIPAT and physical and psychiatric outcomes 1 year after LKT, controlling for follow-up periods and factors other than SIPAT. Comprehensive psychosocial assessment before LKT and early identification of factors that may negatively affect transplant success can allow targeted interventions to be implemented and increase the likelihood of favorable recipient outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266729602300126X/pdfft?md5=1c85a538a2fac0dbc05f973d55b5a26f&pid=1-s2.0-S266729602300126X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266729602300126X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266729602300126X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant and 1-Year Outcome of Living Kidney Transplantation in Japan
Background
Because most kidney transplantations in Japan are performed on the basis of living donors, after-transplant outcomes should achieve optimum results, overcoming participants' possible reduced adherence.
Objective
To investigate the association between the Japanese version of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT-J) and outcomes, 1 year after the patient's living kidney transplant (LKT).
Methods
The prospective cohort study was undertaken at Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital from January 2020 to July 2021, with a 1-year follow-up period. The SIPAT-J assesses 18 psychosocial risk factors: (1) Patient's Readiness Level and Illness Management (SIPAT A), (2) Social Support System Level of Readiness (SIPAT B), (3) Psychological Stability and Psychopathology (SIPAT C), and (4) Lifestyle and Effect of Substance Use (SIPAT D). The evaluators, a psychiatrist and 3 clinical psychologists, conducted an independent, blinded application of the SIPAT-J using participants' medical records. The study focused on physical composite outcomes, psychiatric outcomes, and nonadherent behaviors.
Results
The participants were 173 LKT recipients (median age [interquartile range], 51 [38–59]); 67.1% were male and 67.1% were employed. The median (interquartile range) SIPAT scores were SIPAT A [7 (5–9)], SIPAT B [7 (5–9)], SIPAT C [2 (0–4)], SIPAT D [3 (3–4)], and SIPAT total [20 (16–23)]. The physical composite outcome was 25 (14.5%), psychiatric outcome 9 (5.2%), and nonadherent behavior 17 (9.8%). SIPAT C (odds ratio = 1.34, 95% confidence interval = 1.06–1.72, P = 0.02) was significantly associated with the psychiatric outcome. SIPAT B (odds ratio = 1.49, 95% confidence interval = 1.12–1.98, P = 0.01) and SIPAT total (odds ratio = 1.13, 95% confidence interval = 1.03–1.24, P = 0.01) were significantly associated with nonadherent behaviors. There was no significant association between the SIPAT and physical composite outcomes.
Conclusion
This study is the first to examine the association between SIPAT and physical and psychiatric outcomes 1 year after LKT, controlling for follow-up periods and factors other than SIPAT. Comprehensive psychosocial assessment before LKT and early identification of factors that may negatively affect transplant success can allow targeted interventions to be implemented and increase the likelihood of favorable recipient outcomes.